Improving the strength and SCC resistance of an Al-5Mg-3Zn alloy with low-angle grain boundary structure
Source abstract
Abstract
The strength of traditional Al-Mg alloys is relatively low because it mainly relies on solid solution strengthening. Adding a third component to form precipitation can improve their strength, but it usually leads to high-stress corrosion cracking (SCC) sensitivity due to the formation of high-density precipitates at grain boundaries (GBs). So far, it is still challenging to improve the strength of Al-Mg alloys without reducing SCC resistance. Herein, a nanostructured Al-5Mg-3 Zn alloy with a good yield strength of 336 MPa and good elongation was successfully produced. By dynamic plastic deformation and appropriate annealing treatment, near-equiaxed nanograins were introduced in the nanostructured Al-5Mg-3 Zn alloy with a high proportion (71%) of the low-angle grain boundary. TEM statistical investigations show that the precipitation of active T` phase at GBs has been greatly suppressed in the nanostructured Al-5Mg-3 Zn alloy at sensitized conditions, and the area fraction of GB precipitates is reduced from 72% to 21%, which significantly decreases the SCC susceptibility. This study provides guidance for developing advanced Al-Mg alloy with high SCC resistance.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. Sauvage · Acta Mater. · 2014 · 72 · 12510.1016/j.actamat.2014.03.033 ↗
2. Zha · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2021 · 89 · 14110.1016/j.jmst.2021.01.086 ↗
3. Guan · Corros. Sci. · 2016 · 103 · 25510.1016/j.corsci.2015.11.026 ↗
4. Hirayama · Corros. Sci. · 2021 · 18410.1016/j.corsci.2021.109343 ↗
5. Jain · Corros. Sci. · 2012 · 59 · 13610.1016/j.corsci.2012.02.018 ↗
6. McMahon · Corros. Sci. · 2020 · 169 · 10861810.1016/j.corsci.2020.108618 ↗
7. Seifi · Corros. Sci. · 2018 · 138 · 21910.1016/j.corsci.2018.03.027 ↗
8. Zhang · Corros. Sci. · 2019 · 150 · 26810.1016/j.corsci.2019.02.003 ↗
9. Zhang · Corros. Sci. · 2017 · 126 · 32410.1016/j.corsci.2017.07.015 ↗
10. Davenport · Mater. Sci. Forum · 2006 · 519 · 64110.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.519-521.641 ↗
11. Ding · Corros. Sci. · 2020 · 169
12. Tan · Corros. Sci. · 2010 · 52 · 54810.1016/j.corsci.2009.10.013 ↗
13. Tanguy · Corros. Sci. · 2002 · 44 · 116310.1016/S0010-938X(01)00140-8 ↗
14. Kramer · J. Mater. Eng. Perform. · 2012 · 21 · 102510.1007/s11665-011-9998-9 ↗
15. Ding · Scr. Mater. · 2019 · 171 · 2610.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.06.015 ↗
16. Buranova · Acta Mater. · 2017 · 124 · 21010.1016/j.actamat.2016.10.064 ↗
17. Dougherty · Acta Mater. · 2003 · 51 · 436710.1016/S1359-6454(03)00262-3 ↗
18. Seong · Corrosion · 2016 · 72 · 28410.5006/1798 ↗
19. Argade · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2013 · 565 · 8010.1016/j.msea.2012.11.066 ↗
20. Huang · Acta Mater. · 2010 · 58 · 164310.1016/j.actamat.2009.11.008 ↗
21. Xu · Acta Mater. · 2020 · 182 · 20710.1016/j.actamat.2019.10.036 ↗
22. Xu · Acta Mater. · 2022 · 22610.1016/j.actamat.2022.117640 ↗
23. Zha · Acta Mater. · 2015 · 84 · 4210.1016/j.actamat.2014.10.025 ↗
24. Xu · Science · 2021 · 373 · 68310.1126/science.abh0700 ↗
25. Lu · Nat. Rev. Mater. · 2016 · 1 · 1601910.1038/natrevmats.2016.19 ↗
26. Ito · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2017 · 679 · 42810.1016/j.msea.2016.10.066 ↗
27. Yan · Sci. Rep. · 2016 · 6 · 2687010.1038/srep26870 ↗
28. Meyers · Prog. Mater. Sci. · 2006 · 51 · 42710.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.08.003 ↗
29. Chookajorn · Science · 2012 · 337 · 95110.1126/science.1224737 ↗
30. Lu · Science · 2004 · 304 · 42210.1126/science.1092905 ↗
31. Liu · Science · 2013 · 342 · 33710.1126/science.1242578 ↗
32. Darling · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2010 · 527 · 357210.1016/j.msea.2010.02.043 ↗
33. Hu · Science · 2017 · 355 · 129210.1126/science.aal5166 ↗
34. Wu · Mater. Lett. · 2022 · 315
35. Luo · Acta Mater. · 2012 · 60 · 132210.1016/j.actamat.2011.11.035 ↗
36. Xu · Acta Mater. · 2018 · 152 · 13810.1016/j.actamat.2018.04.014 ↗
37. Xu · Acta Mater. · 2022 · 22510.1016/j.actamat.2021.117607 ↗
38. Xin · J. Alloys Compd. · 2022 · 91110.1016/j.jallcom.2022.165016 ↗
39. Huang · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2011 · 27 · 110.1016/S1005-0302(11)60017-0 ↗
40. Stemper · Acta Mater. · 2021 · 20610.1016/j.actamat.2020.116617 ↗
41. Meng · J. Alloys Compd. · 2016 · 655 · 17810.1016/j.jallcom.2015.09.159 ↗
42. Sun · Corros. Sci. · 2013 · 77 · 10310.1016/j.corsci.2013.07.032 ↗
43. Bigot · Microsc. Microanal. Microstruct. · 1997 · 8 · 10310.1051/mmm:1997109 ↗
44. Liu · J. Alloys Compd. · 2022 · 908
45. Pan · J. Alloys Compd. · 2021 · 853
46. Fan · Acta Mater. · 2017 · 139 · 18810.1016/j.actamat.2017.08.011 ↗
47. Sun · Corros. Sci. · 2022 · 19510.1016/j.corsci.2021.110021 ↗
48. Ikeuba · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2018 · 165 · C18010.1149/2.0861803jes ↗
49. Ikeuba · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2020 · 16710.1149/1945-7111/ab6a66 ↗
50. Ma · Acta Mater. · 2014 · 62 · 14110.1016/j.actamat.2013.09.042 ↗
51. Hansen · Scr. Mater. · 2004 · 51 · 80110.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.06.002 ↗
52. Ryen · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 2006 · 37 · 199910.1007/s11661-006-0142-7 ↗
53. Huang · Acta Mater. · 2018 · 156 · 36910.1016/j.actamat.2018.07.006 ↗
54. Barrera · J. Mater. Sci. · 2018 · 53 · 625110.1007/s10853-017-1978-5 ↗
55. Herms · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 1992 · 272 · 27910.1016/S0921-5093(99)00319-6 ↗
56. Chen · Scr. Mater. · 2019 · 163 · 14810.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.10.054 ↗
57. Hu · Scr. Mater. · 2014 · 78-79 · 2510.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.01.020 ↗