A deep insight into the preparation of ceramic bone scaffolds utilizing robocasting technique
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract From long ago, orthopedists and physicians are trying to deal with bone diseases and disorders, while today, in the regenerative medicine field, bone scaffolds are being in attendance. Although there were common methods for fabricating bone scaffolds, such as foam casting and gas foaming, additive manufacturing (AM) techniques have been considered for producing bone scaffolds due to some appealing features such as creating a hierarchical structure, regular and controlled porosity, and designing of the complicated structures. AM techniques are divided into three categories, including extrusion-based, powder-based, and vat polymerization (light-based) techniques. Among the AM methods, the robocasting technique as an extrusion-based method is highly regarded for designing high-strength scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration owing to special features, for instance, a low-volume binder and the ability to print all types of ceramic materials as well as metals and polymers. This study discusses the robocasting method, as well as the essential parameters that are involved in 3D printing of the ideal scaffold with this method, such as the material, the structure of the robotic device, the printing parameters, the properties of the ideal paste or ink, the role of binder and its types in robocasting, and the rheological properties required in robocasting method. Also, future prospects and clinical applications of this technique were reviewed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Anatomy and Medical Technology
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Bone tissue engineering using 3D printing10.1016/j.mattod.2013.11.017 ↗
2. Chemical and biochemical basis of cell-bone matrix interaction in health and disease
3. 3D printed scaffolds as a new perspective for bone tissue regeneration: literature review
4. Biomaterials for bone tissue engineering10.1016/S1369-7021(08)70086-5 ↗
5. 3D bioactive composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.10.001 ↗
6. Barberi · 2018
7. 3D printing of bioactive ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering10.4172/1948-593X.1000e155 ↗
8. Assessment of bone ingrowth into porous biomaterials using MICRO-CT10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.01.046 ↗
9. Influence of scaffold pore size on collagen I development: a new in vitro evaluation perspective10.1177/0883911512470885 ↗
10. Effect of polycaprolactone scaffold permeability on bone regeneration in vivo10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0560 ↗
11. Osteoconduction and osteoinduction of low-temperature 3D printed bioceramic implants10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.10.023 ↗
12. Polymeric materials for bone and cartilage repair10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.01.006 ↗
13. Bone regeneration based on tissue engineering conceptions — a 21st century perspective10.4248/BR201303002 ↗
14. Three-dimensional glass-derived scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: current trends and forecasts for the future10.1002/jbm.a.33072 ↗
15. Design, selection and characterization of novel glasses and glass-ceramics for use in prosthetic applications10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.09.094 ↗
16. Fundamentals of biomechanics in tissue engineering of bone10.1089/107632700418083 ↗
17. 3D printing of bioceramics for bone tissue engineering10.3390/ma12203361 ↗
18. 3D printing of ceramic-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: an overview10.1039/C8TB00677F ↗
19. Characterization of hydroxyapatite/carbon nanotubes coatings on Ti6Al4V10.1002/vjch.201800055 ↗
20. Manufacture of fibrous β-Si3N4-reinforced biomorphic SiC matrix composites for bioceramic scaffold applications10.1016/j.msec.2008.11.012 ↗
21. Physiochemical properties of a bioceramic-based root canal sealer reinforced with multi-walled carbon nanotubes, titanium carbide and boron nitride biomaterials10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103892 ↗
22. Preparation and properties of in-situ growth of carbon nanotubes reinforced hydroxyapatite coating for carbon/carbon composites10.1016/j.msec.2016.09.060 ↗
23. Recent advances in biomaterials for 3D printing and tissue engineering10.3390/jfb9010022 ↗
24. Bioactive glass bone grafts: history and clinical applications
25. Calcium silicate as a graft material for bone fractures: a systematic review10.1177/0300060518770940 ↗
26. Biodegradable materials for bone defect repair10.1186/s40779-020-00280-6 ↗
27. Biodegradable materials for bone repair and tissue engineering applications10.3390/ma8095273 ↗
28. Comparison of hydroxyapatite and beta tricalcium phosphate as bone substitutes after excision of bone tumors10.1002/jbm.b.30136 ↗
29. Reaction of bone to tricalcium phosphate ceramic pellets, Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine10.1016/0030-4220(72)90457-4 ↗
30. Evaluation of a biodegradable ceramic10.1002/jbm.820110204 ↗
31. In vivo response of porous hydroxyapatite and β-tricalcium phosphate prepared by aqueous solution combustion method and comparison with bioglass scaffolds10.1002/jbm.b.31009 ↗
32. Early weight bearing of porous HA/TCP (60/40) ceramics in vivo: a longitudinal study in a segmental bone defect model of rabbit10.1016/j.actbio.2007.04.004 ↗
33. Dicalcium phosphate cements: brushite and monetite10.1016/j.actbio.2011.08.005 ↗
34. Biphasic products of dicalcium phosphate-rich cement with injectability and nondispersibility10.1016/j.msec.2014.02.033 ↗
35. Comparative performance of three ceramic bone graft substitutes10.1016/j.spinee.2006.07.017 ↗
36. Physico–chemical and in vitro biological study of zinc-doped calcium sulfate bone substitute10.1002/jbm.b.31371 ↗
37. Reticulated replica ceramic foams: processing, functionalization, and characterization10.1002/adem.201700369 ↗
38. Bioactive glass scaffold with similar structure and mechanical properties of cancellous bone10.1002/jbm.b.31736 ↗
39. Bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: state of the art and future perspectives10.1016/j.msec.2011.04.022 ↗
40. New trends in bioactive scaffolds: the importance of nanostructure10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2008.08.003 ↗
41. Mechanical properties and reliability of glass–ceramic foam scaffolds for bone repair10.1016/j.matlet.2013.12.037 ↗
42. Freeze-casting: fabrication of highly porous and hierarchical ceramic supports for energy applications10.1016/j.bsecv.2016.02.002 ↗
43. Freeze casting of hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.06.028 ↗
44. Control of pore structure and size in freeze-dried collagen sponges10.1002/jbm.1028 ↗
45. Oriented bioactive glass (13-93) scaffolds with controllable pore size by unidirectional freezing of camphene-based suspensions: microstructure and mechanical response10.1016/j.actbio.2010.08.025 ↗
46. A comprehensive review summarizing the effect of electrospinning parameters and potential applications of nanofibers in biomedical and biotechnology10.1016/j.arabjc.2015.11.015 ↗
47. Electrospinning of ceramic nanofibers: fabrication, assembly and applications10.1007/s40145-012-0002-4 ↗
48. Fabrication of scaffolds for bone-tissue regeneration10.3390/ma12040568 ↗
49. Preparation and characterization of nano-hydroxyapatite/poly (ε-caprolactone)− poly (ethylene glycol)− poly (ε-caprolactone) composite fibers for tissue engineering10.1021/jp106488t ↗
50. Nanostructured ceramics by electrospinning10.1063/1.2815499 ↗
51. Morphological control of centimeter long aluminum-doped zinc oxide nanofibers prepared by electrospinning10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01366.x ↗
52. Solid freeform fabrication of three-dimensional scaffolds for engineering replacement tissues and organs10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00030-9 ↗
53. Porous titanium scaffolds fabricated using a rapid prototyping and powder metallurgy technique10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.05.032 ↗
54. Robocasting of SiO2-based bioactive glass scaffolds with porosity gradient for bone regeneration and potential load-bearing applications10.3390/ma12172691 ↗
55. Additive manufacturing of ceramics: issues, potentialities, and opportunities10.1111/jace.13700 ↗
56. 4 - additive manufacturing of ceramic components
57. Ceramic robocasting: recent achievements, potential, and future developments10.1002/adma.201802404 ↗
58. 3D printing of ceramics: a review10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.11.013 ↗
59. Additive manufacturing of zirconia parts by indirect selective laser sintering10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2013.07.023 ↗
60. Influence of resin composition on the defect formation in alumina manufactured by stereolithography10.3390/ma10020138 ↗
61. Ceramic stereolithography: additive manufacturing for ceramics by photopolymerization10.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-031841 ↗
62. 3D printing with polymers: challenges among expanding options and opportunities10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.018 ↗
63. A new method of fabricating robust freeform 3D ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration10.1002/bit.24794 ↗
64. Use of stereolithography to manufacture critical-sized 3D biodegradable scaffolds for bone ingrowth10.1002/jbm.b.10485 ↗
65. Ceramic stereolithography: additive manufacturing for 3D complex ceramic structures10.4191/kcers.2017.54.6.12 ↗
66. A review on stereolithography and its applications in biomedical engineering10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.050 ↗
67. Robocasting of structural ceramic parts with hydrogel inks10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2016.03.001 ↗
68. Wilkes · 2013
69. Solvent-cast based metal 3D printing and secondary metallic infiltration10.1039/C7TC02884A ↗
70. Fabrication of microporous bacterial cellulose embedded with magnetite and hydroxyapatite nanocomposite scaffold for bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.121868 ↗
71. Minardi · 2016 · 241
72. The role of moderate static magnetic fields on biomineralization of osteoblasts on sulfonated polystyrene films10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.06.053 ↗
73. Vascular permeability induced by protein product of malignant brain tumors: inhibition by dexamethasone10.3171/jns.1987.67.6.0880 ↗
74. Static magnetic field exposure promotes differentiation of osteoblastic cells grown on the surface of a poly-l-lactide substrate10.1007/s11517-010-0639-5 ↗
75. 3D additive-manufactured nanocomposite magnetic scaffolds: effect of the application mode of a time-dependent magnetic field on hMSCs behavior10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.04.003 ↗
76. Advanced composites for hard-tissue engineering based on PCL/organic–inorganic hybrid fillers: from the design of 2D substrates to 3D rapid prototyped scaffolds10.1002/pc.22446 ↗
77. Poly(∊-Caprolactone) reinforced with sol-gel synthesized organic-inorganic hybrid fillers as composite substrates for tissue engineering
78. Further theoretical insight into the mechanical properties of polycaprolactone loaded with organic–inorganic hybrid fillers
79. Rheological study on 3D printability of alginate hydrogel and effect of graphene oxide
80. What makes a material printable? A viscoelastic model for extrusion-based 3D printing of polymers10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.08.008 ↗
81. Cordonier · 2017
82. Dual-Responsive hydrogels for direct-write 3D printing10.1021/acs.macromol.5b01550 ↗
83. Mechanical properties of calcium phosphate scaffolds fabricated by robocasting10.1002/jbm.a.31587 ↗
84. A simple recipe for direct writing complex 45S5 Bioglass® 3D scaffolds10.1016/j.matlet.2012.11.043 ↗
85. Robocasting of 45S5 bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2013.08.003 ↗
86. 3D printing of functional magnetic materials: from design to applications10.1002/adfm.202102777 ↗
87. 3D-printed magnetic Fe3O4/MBG/PCL composite scaffolds with multifunctionality of bone regeneration, local anticancer drug delivery and hyperthermia10.1039/C4TB01063A ↗
88. 3D printing of bone tissue engineering scaffolds
89. Direct ink writing of 3–3 piezoelectric composite10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.09.124 ↗
90. Dávila Sánchez · 2018
91. Li · 2007 · 715
92. J.F. Cordonier, D. Bhattacharyya, M.A.T. Arango, K.A. Sierros, R.K. Gupta, Modelling and Validation of a Direct-Write 3D Printed Track.
93. Fugitive inks for direct-write assembly of three-dimensional microvascular networks10.1002/adma.200400481 ↗
94. Microsyringe-based deposition of two-dimensional and three-dimensional polymer scaffolds with a well-defined geometry for application to tissue engineering10.1089/107632702320934182 ↗
95. Effect of needle geometry on flow rate and cell damage in the dispensing-based biofabrication process10.1002/btpr.679 ↗
96. Rheological and extrusion behavior of dental porcelain slurries for rapid prototyping applications10.1016/j.msea.2005.02.045 ↗
97. Biopolymer deposition for freeform fabrication of hydrogel tissue constructs10.1016/j.msec.2006.05.023 ↗
98. E.N. Udofia, W. Zhou, Microextrusion Based 3D Printing–A Review.
99. Wetting and spreading10.1103/RevModPhys.81.739 ↗
100. Recent developments in freeform fabrication of dense ceramics from slurry deposition