journal article·2015-11

Characterisation, significance and detection of manufacturing defects in Reaction Sintered Silicon Carbide armour materials

Ian G Crouch, Manasa Kesharaju, Romesh Nagarajah

Ceramics International· Volume 41· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Ceramics with high hardness values (>10 GPa), high elastic modulii (>300 GPa) and good flexural strength values (>350 MPa) make excellent armour materials. However, they are normally very expensive (>$10/kg) and difficult to shape. So, tiles of regular geometry (typically square or hexagonal) have been used in advanced armour systems, for military vehicles. However, for body armour applications, there is a need to form a monolithic ceramic into a double-curved, or even triple-curved, shape in order to better conform to the human torso. In a recent review, carried out by the Defence Materials Technology Centre of Australia, of the shaping techniques used for body armour components, uniaxial pressing of breastplates was still recognised to be the most feasible, and commercially available, process even though other techniques like Viscous Plastic Processing (VPP) were becoming established. One particular variant of the dry-pressing route is known as Reaction Sintering, or Reaction Bonding, in which a pre-pressed, dry powder compact is infiltrated, at elevated temperature, with a liquid metal. However, the process is prone to the formation of a range of manufacturing defects, some of which are extremely deleterious to impact behaviour and ballistic performance of the finished product. The origin, cause and effect of these defects are discussed in this paper, together with both current and future NDI techniques.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Advanced materials and composites · Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. Klintworth · 2003
2. B.J. James, Practical issues in ceramic armor design, in: Proceedings of the Ceramic Armor Materials for Design symposium, PacRim IV International Conference on Advanced Ceramics and Glass, Maui, Hawaii, USA, November 2001, Ceram. Trans. 134 (2002) 33–44.
3. Crouch · 2009
4. Near-net shaping methods for ceramic elements of (body) armor systems10.1111/jace.13192 ↗
5. W.A. Gooch, An Overview of Ceramic Armor Applications, in: Proceedings of the Ceramic Armor Materials for Design symposium, PacRim IV International Conference on Advanced Ceramics and Glass, Maui, Hawaii, USA, November 2001, Ceram. Trans. 134, (2002) 3–22.
6. M.K. Aghajanian et al., A new family of Reaction Bonded Ceramics for Armor Applications, in: Proceedings of the Ceramic Armor Materials for Design symposium, PacRim IV International Conference on Advanced Ceramics and Glass, Maui, Hawaii, USA, November 2001, Ceram. Trans. 134 (2002) 527–540.
7. Non-Contact Measurement and Characterisation of Armour Ceramics (Ph.D. thesis)
8. Hazell · 2006
9. I.G. Crouch, Effects of cladding ceramics and its influence on ballistic performance, in: Proceedings of the 28th International Symposium on Ballistics, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, September 2014.
10. P. Karandikar, M.K. Aghajanian, S. Wong and G. Evans, Proceedings of the Personnel Armour Systems Symposium, Quebec, Canada, 2010, pp. 432–441.
11. K.M. Taylor, Cold Molded Dense Silicon Carbide Articles and Methods of Making Same, U.S. Patent No. 3,275,722, 1965.
12. K.M. Taylor and R.J. Palicka, Dense Carbide Composite for Armor and Abrasives, U.S. Patent No. 3,765,300, 1973.
13. E. Popov, Private communication (with I. G. Crouch), circa 2003.
14. N. Haynes et al., Automated non-destructive evaluation system for hard armour protective inserts of body armor, in: Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Advanced Ceramics and Composites, Daytona Beach, Florida, USA, January 2008, Adv. Ceram. Armor IV. (2009) 211–218.
15. Determination of density variation and microstructure in reaction‐sintered sic ceramics using ultrasonic time-of-flight10.1111/ijac.12005 ↗
16. Ultrasonic sensor based defect detection and characterisation of ceramics10.1016/j.ultras.2013.07.018 ↗
17. M. Kesharaju and R. Nagarajah, Feature extraction for ultrasonic sensor based defect detection in ceramic components, in: Proceedings of the 40th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, 2014.10.1063/1.4865060 ↗