A comparison of microstructure and uniaxial compressive response of ice-templated alumina scaffolds fabricated from two different particle sizes
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This study investigates the effects of two different particle sizes (0.3 μ m vs. 0.9 μ m ) on the microstructure and uniaxial compressive response of ice-templated sintered alumina scaffolds as a function of the solids loading of the ceramic suspensions and freezing front velocity (FFV). For a comparable solids loading and FFV, variation of the particle size is observed to have a significant effect on the microstructure of the fabricated scaffolds. Moreover, transition of the pore morphology with the increasing solids loading and FFV is observed to be more drastic for the scaffolds processed from the 0.9 μ m size powder particles compared to the scaffolds processed from the 0.3 μ m size powder particles. Similarly, particle size variation also influenced significantly the relative density and porosity of the scaffolds. Interestingly, in spite of the observed significant differences of the microstructure and relative density, uniaxial compressive stress-strain measurements revealed marginal effects of the particle size variation on the compressive strength. The measured comparable uniaxial compressive response of the sintered alumina scaffolds fabricated from two different particle sizes are rationalized based on the relative density, pore aspect ratio, and interlamellae bridge density.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Cellular and Composite Structures · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Ice-templated porous alumina structures10.1016/j.actamat.2006.11.003 ↗
2. Biomaterials by freeze casting10.1098/rsta.2010.0014 ↗
3. Freezing as a path to build complex composites10.1126/science.1120937 ↗
4. Bioinspired scaffolds with varying pore architectures and mechanical properties10.1002/adfm.201302958 ↗
5. Ice templating, freeze casting: beyond materials processing10.1557/jmr.2013.105 ↗
6. Dynamic fragmentation of cellular, ice-templated alumina scaffolds10.1063/1.4939702 ↗
7. Freeze casting of hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.06.028 ↗
8. Effect of macropore anisotropy on the mechanical response of hierarchically porous ceramics10.1111/jace.14004 ↗
9. A symmetrical, planar SOFC design for NASA’s high specific power density requirements10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.08.110 ↗
10. Architecture engineering of hierarchically porous chitosan/vacuum-stripped graphene scaffold as bioanode for high performance microbial fuel cell10.1021/nl302175j ↗
11. Thin film YSZ coatings on functionally graded freeze cast NiO/YSZ SOFC anode supports10.1007/s10800-008-9682-4 ↗
12. On the development of ice-templated silicon carbide scaffolds for nature-inspired structural materials10.1016/j.actamat.2013.08.006 ↗
13. Mechanical performance and CO2 uptake of ion-exchanged zeolite A structured by freeze-casting10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.03.001 ↗
14. A meta-analysis of the mechanical properties of ice-templated ceramics and metals10.1088/1468-6996/16/4/043501 ↗
15. Mechanical properties and failure behavior of unidirectional porous ceramics10.1038/srep24326 ↗
16. Freeze casting of porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds. II. Sintering, microstructure, and mechanical behavior10.1002/jbm.b.31051 ↗
17. Influence of particle size on ice nucleation and growth during the ice-templating process10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.03840.x ↗
18. Investigation of structure formation during freeze-casting from very slow to very fast solidification velocities10.1016/j.actamat.2011.04.046 ↗
19. In situ X-ray radiography and tomography observations of the solidification of aqueous alumina particle suspensions—part I: Initial instants10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03163.x ↗
20. Mohamed · 2007
21. Metastable and unstable cellular solidification of colloidal suspensions10.1038/nmat2571 ↗
22. Influence of surface tension, osmotic pressure and pores morphology on the densification of ice-templated ceramics10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2010.12.021 ↗
23. Gibson · 1999
24. Uniaxial quasistatic and dynamic compressive response of foams made from hollow glass microspheres10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.10.018 ↗