A comparative study on the effect of loading speed and surface scratches on the flexural strength of aluminosilicate glass: Annealed vs. chemically strengthened
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Quasi-static and dynamic three-point-bending experiments were conducted on both annealed and chemically strengthened aluminosilicate glass scratched by different normal loads. Scratched areas were observed by optical microscope and atomic force microscope. Chemically strengthened glass shows better resistance to surface scratch. These dynamic experiments were carried out using a modified Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) device and a pulse-shaping technique was used to keep constant loading speed to the specimens. In tests, high-speed photography was also used to observe the failure process of the specimens. The test results showed that the flexural strength of aluminosilicate glass (AG) strongly depends on the applied loading speed. Compared with its annealed counterpart, the chemically strengthened glass (CSG) showed higher flexural strength to both static and dynamic loadings. Moreover, the three-point bending experiments were conducted on scratched AG and CSG specimens and decrease of 20–40% in flexural strength was observed. The fractography analysis showed that in dynamic loading conditions the fracture surface was not smooth and has more secondary cracks as compared to static loading.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Glass properties and applications · Structural Analysis of Composite Materials · Building materials and conservation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Dynamic material model of annealed soda-lime glass10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.11.016 ↗
2. Dynamic failure of borosilicate glass under compression/shear loading experiments10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01819.x ↗
3. Behavior of strengthened glass under high-velocity impact10.1023/A:1016218600225 ↗
4. Ion exchange for glass strengthening10.1016/j.mseb.2007.11.029 ↗
5. Chemical strengthening of glass: lessons learned and yet to be learned10.1111/j.2041-1294.2010.00010.x ↗
6. The effect of single-side ion exchange on the flexural strength of plain and holed float glass
7. Structural performance of laminated and unlaminated tempered glass under monotonic transverse loading10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.01.051 ↗
8. Progressive damage and fracture of laminated glass beams10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.09.007 ↗
9. Equibiaxial flexure strength of glass: influence of glass plate size and equibiaxial ring ratio10.1111/ijag.12094 ↗
10. Effect of loading rate and surface conditions on the flexural strength of borosilicate glass10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03019.x ↗
11. Dynamic ring-on-ring equibiaxial flexural strength of borosilicate glass10.1111/j.1744-7402.2010.02508.x ↗
12. Static and dynamic flexural strength of 99.5% alumina: relation to porosity10.1016/j.mechmat.2012.07.003 ↗
13. Some aspects of strength characteristics of glass
14. Scratch test of soda-lime glass10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00163-3 ↗
15. Varner · 2012 · 113
16. Glaesemann · 2012 · 85
17. Influence of surface scratches on the flexure strength of soda-lime silicate and borosilicate glass10.1007/s11340-012-9674-5 ↗
18. F.C. Frank, B.R. Lawn, On the theory of Hertzian fracture. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., 299(1458), 1967, pp. 291–306.10.1098/rspa.1967.0137 ↗
19. B. Lawn, Partial cone crack formation in a brittle material loaded with a sliding spherical indenter, Proc. R. Soc. Lond., The Royal Society, 1967.
20. Indentation of ceramics with spheres: a century after Hertz10.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02580.x ↗
21. Evaluation of surface cracking in micron and sub-micron scale scratch tests for optical glass BK710.1007/s12206-011-0306-2 ↗
22. Surface damage of soda–lime–silica glasses: indentation scratch behavior10.1016/S0022-3093(02)01937-3 ↗
23. E.L. Bourhis, Glass: Mechanics and Technology, 2014.10.1002/9783527679461 ↗
24. An investigation of the mechanical properties of materials at very high rates of loading10.1088/0370-1301/62/11/302 ↗
25. The Hopkinson pressure bar: an alternative to the instrumented pendulum for Charpy tests10.1007/BF00034296 ↗
26. Size effect on the contact state between fracture specimen and supports in Hopkinson bar loaded fracture test10.1007/s10704-011-9588-8 ↗
27. Dynamic compressive failure of a glass ceramic under lateral confinement10.1016/S0022-5096(97)00006-9 ↗
28. Dynamic compressive strength of silicon carbide under uniaxial compression10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01172-8 ↗
29. A non-equilibrium approach to processing Hopkinson bar bending test data: application to quasi-brittle materials10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.07.001 ↗
30. G.D. Quinn, G.D. Quinn, Fractography of Ceramics and Glasses, National Institute of Standards and Technology Washington, DC, 2007.
31. A.B. Kulp, Analysis of Strength Variation in Glass Due to Ion Exchange, Virginia Tech, 2012.
32. ChemInform abstract: effect of grinding on flaw geometry and fracture of glass
33. On surface cracks in glasses
34. Dynamic fracture of inorganic glasses by hard spherical and conical projectiles
35. An introduction to the properties of silica glass in ballistic applications10.1111/str.12075 ↗
36. A review of dynamic experimental techniques and mechanical behaviour of rock materials10.1007/s00603-013-0463-y ↗
37. Experimental study of fracture of glass: I, the fracture process10.1111/j.1151-2916.1954.tb14005.x ↗
38. Experimental study of fracture of glass: II, experimental data10.1111/j.1151-2916.1954.tb13990.x ↗