Fracture toughness of glasses and hydroxyapatite: A comparative study of 7 methods by using Vickers indenter
Source abstract
Abstract
Numerous methods have been proposed to estimate the indentation fracture toughness Kic for brittle materials. These methods generally uses formulae established from empirical correlations between critical applied force, or average crack length, and classical fracture mechanics tests. This study compares several models of fracture toughness calculation obtained by using Vickers indenters. Two optical glasses (Crown and Flint), one vitroceramic (Zerodur) and one ceramic (hydroxyapatite) are tested. Fracture toughness and hardness are obtained by using instrumented Vickers indentation at micrometer scale. Young's moduli are obtained by instrumented Berkovich indentation at nanometer scale. Fracture toughness is calculated with models involving crack length measurements, and by models free of crack length measurements by considering critical force, chipping, pop-in. Finally, method based on the cracking energy, commonly employed for coated materials is also used. The aim of this work is to compare seven methods, which enable the facture toughness determination, on four brittle materials. To do so, it was necessary to determine some specific constant in the case of Vickers tip use. On the one hand, results show that methods using crack length, critical force, edge chipping or pop-in lead to comparable results, and the advantages and drawbacks are highlighted. On the other hand, the indentation energy method leads to underestimated results of about 20%.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Advanced materials and composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. Hardness and toughness of sodium borosilicate glasses via Vickers's indentations10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2015.02.005 ↗
2. Wilantewicz · 2005
3. A model for lapping of glass10.1007/BF00354706 ↗
4. VI. The influence of flaws and air-cavities on the strength of materials10.1080/14786449208620233 ↗
5. The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids10.1098/rsta.1921.0006 ↗
6. G.R. Irwin, Plastic zone near a crack and fracture toughness, in: Proceedings of the Seventh Sagamore Conference, Syracure University Research Institute, vol. IV, 1960, pp. 63–76.
7. Wide range stress intensity factor expressions for ASTM E 399 standard fracture toughness specimens10.1007/BF00032844 ↗
8. Fracture toughness comparison of three test methods with four dental porcelains10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.033 ↗
9. Comparison of three fracture toughness testing techniques using a dental glass and a dental ceramic10.1016/S0109-5641(98)00032-3 ↗
10. Détermination de la ténacité de matériaux fragiles ou ductiles à partir de l’essai d’indentation
11. Method of determining the toughness of brittle materials, particularly sintered carbides
12. Indentation fracture and strength degradation in ceramics
13. Determination of fracture toughness parameters for tungsten carbide-cobalt alloys
14. Chen · 2006
15. A critical evaluation of indentation techniques for measuring fracture toughness. I.– Direct crack measurements10.1111/j.1151-2916.1981.tb10320.x ↗
16. A critical evaluation of indentation techniques for measuring fracture toughness. II.– Strength method10.1111/j.1151-2916.1981.tb10321.x ↗
17. Evaluation of fracture toughness of small volumes by means of cube-corner nanoindentation10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.01.033 ↗
18. D.S. Harding, W.C. Oliver, G.M. Pharr, Cracking during nanoindentation and its use in the measurement of fracture toughness, in: Proceedings of Symposium B2 – Thin Films: Stresses and Mechanical Properties V, vol. 356, 1994.10.1557/PROC-356-663 ↗
19. New formula for indentation toughness in ceramics10.1007/BF01729352 ↗
20. Determining indentation toughness by incorporating true hardness into fracture mechanics equations10.1016/S0955-2219(98)00256-8 ↗
21. Comment on the determination of mechanical properties from the energy dissipated during indentation10.1557/JMR.2005.0162 ↗
22. Relation between the ratio of elastic work to the total work of indentation and the ratio of hardness to Young's modulus for a perfect conical tip10.1557/jmr.2009.0086 ↗
23. Scaling relationships for indentation measurements10.1080/01418610208235693 ↗
24. A method to determine fracture toughness using cube-corner indentation10.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.10.025 ↗
25. A work approach to determine Vickers indentation fracture toughness10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.04289.x ↗
26. Novel measurement technique of crack length for indentation fracture (IF) method using high contrast image of crack tips through thin film coating10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.04.008 ↗
27. On the theory of hertzian fracture10.1098/rspa.1967.0137 ↗
28. A model for crack initiation in elastic/plastic indentation fields10.1007/BF00552240 ↗
29. Glasses: new approach to fracture behavior analysis10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.01.021 ↗
30. Fracture toughness testing of materials by the EF method10.1134/S0020168506050207 ↗
31. Edge chipping of hard materials10.1016/S0263-4368(01)00030-0 ↗
32. A universal relation for edge chipping from sharp contacts in brittle materials: a simple means of toughness evaluation10.1016/j.actamat.2006.10.061 ↗
33. Tada · 2000
34. Determination of fracture toughness from the extra penetration produced by indentation-induced pop-in10.1557/JMR.2003.0194 ↗
35. A new method for hardness determination from depth sensing indentation tests10.1557/JMR.1996.0376 ↗
36. Fracture toughness from submicron derived indentation cracks10.1063/1.1711164 ↗
37. Fracture toughness and adhesion energy of sol-gel coatings on glass10.1557/JMR.2002.0032 ↗
38. Measuring mechanical properties of coatings: a methodology applied to nano-particle-filled sol–gel coatings on glass10.1016/S0927-796X(01)00040-7 ↗
39. Energy dissipation, fracture toughness and the indentation load–displacement curve of coated materials10.1016/S0257-8972(00)00906-3 ↗
40. Improvement of the hydroxyapatite mechanical properties by direct microwave sintering in single mode cavity10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2013.12.035 ↗
41. An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments10.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
42. Microstructure and mechanical properties of hydroxyapatite ceramics with zirconia dispersion prepared by post-sintering10.1016/0142-9612(90)90053-S ↗
43. Processing and mechanical properties of hydroxyapatite reinforced with hydroxyapatite whiskers10.1016/0142-9612(96)87652-6 ↗
44. M.J. Viens, Fracture toughness and crack growth of Zerodur, Maryland, NASA, Technical Memorandum 4185, 1990.
45. Subsurface damage in precision ground ULE® and Zerodur® surfaces10.1364/OE.15.012197 ↗
46. Comparative measurement of indentation fracture toughness with berkovich and Vickers indenters10.1111/j.1151-2916.1992.tb04425.x ↗
47. Kurt Nattermann, N. Neuroth, Robert J. Scheller, Mechanical properties, 3rd ed., The Properties of Optical Glass (Schott Series on Glass and Glass Ceramics), Hardcover: Springer, 2004, pp. 179–198.10.1007/978-3-642-57769-7_4 ↗
48. Analysis of sharp-tip-indentation load–depth curve for contact area determination taking into account pile-up and sink-in effects10.1557/JMR.2004.0419 ↗
49. Determination of Young's modulus by nanoindentation10.1360/03ye0590 ↗
50. Fracture mechanisms of thin amorphous carbon films in nanoindentation10.1016/S1359-6454(97)00143-2 ↗
51. Fracture toughness, hardness and elastic modulus of hydrogenated amorphous carbon films deposited by chemical vapor deposition10.1016/j.tsf.2005.08.342 ↗
52. Refined measurements of indentation fracture resistance of alumina using powerful optical microscopy10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.10.039 ↗