journal article·2023-04

High-velocity impact study of an advanced ceramic using finite element model coupling with a machine learning approach

Alex Yang, Dan Romanyk, James D. Hogan

Ceramics International· Volume 49· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

A numerical approach combining finite element modeling and machine learning is used to inform the material performance of an alumina ceramic tile undergoing high-velocity impact. In this study, the alumina ceramic tile is simulated by incorporating a user-defined Johnson–Holmquist–Beissel (JHB) material model within the framework of smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) in LS-DYNA finite element software. The implementation of the JHB model is verified by comparing equivalent stress–pressure responses through a single element simulation test. After implementation, the computational framework is simulated across our chosen range of conditions by matching the results from both plate impact experiments and ballistic testing from the literature. The computational model is then used to generate training data sets for an artificial neural network (ANN) to predict the residual velocity and projectile erosion for an alumina ceramic tile undergoing high-velocity impact in the SPH framework. The ANN is then used to perform a sensitivity analysis involving exploring the effect of mechanical properties (e.g., strength and shear modulus) and impact simulation geometries (e.g., thickness of ceramic tile) on material performance (i.e., residual projectile velocity and erosion). Overall, this study shows the capability of the FEM-ANN approach in studying the high-velocity impact on ceramic tiles and is applicable to guide the structural-scale design of ceramic-based protection systems.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Geophysical Methods and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. The influence of metal cover plates on ballistic performance of silicon carbide subjected to large-scale tungsten projectile10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108659 ↗
2. Historical review of high strain rate and shock properties of ceramics relevant to their application in armour10.1179/174367609X422180 ↗
3. The ballistic impact performance of nanocrystalline zirconia-toughened alumina (nZTA) and alumina ceramics10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.09.068 ↗
4. Ballistic performance evaluation of ceramic tiles with respect to projectile velocity against hard steel projectile using DOP test10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.11.020 ↗
5. Alumina-based ceramics for armor application: mechanical characterization and ballistic testing
6. Investigation on the ballistic behavior of mosaic SiC/UHMWPE composite armor systems10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.05.071 ↗
7. Ballistic performance of ceramic/composite structures10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.10.042 ↗
8. Fragmentation of an advanced ceramic under ballistic impact: mechanisms and microstructure10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.12.008 ↗
9. Laser-driven flyers and nanosecond-resolved velocimetry for spall studies in thin metal foils10.1007/s11340-019-00519-x ↗
10. FE coupled to SPH numerical model for the simulation of high-velocity impact on ceramic based ballistic shields10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.06.151 ↗
11. Flash X-ray cinematography analysis of dwell and penetration of small caliber projectiles with three types of SiC ceramics10.1016/j.dt.2016.01.011 ↗
12. Criterion for interface defeat to penetration transition of long rod projectile impact on ceramic armor10.1016/j.tws.2017.04.016 ↗
13. Investigation on high-velocity impact performance of multi-layered alumina ceramic armors with polymeric interlayers10.1177/0021998315622982 ↗
14. Numerical simulation of long rods impacting silicon carbide targets using JH-1 model10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.09.011 ↗
15. A computational framework for modelling impact induced damage in ceramic and ceramic-metal composite structures10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.12.064 ↗
16. Numerical simulation of normal and oblique ballistic impact on ceramic composite armours10.1016/S0263-8223(03)00187-9 ↗
17. Steel spheres impact on alumina ceramic tiles: Experiments and finite element simulations10.1111/ijac.13318 ↗
18. A computational constitutive model for brittle materials subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high pressures
19. An improved computational constitutive model for brittle materials
20. Response of aluminum nitride (including a phase change) to large strains, high strain rates, and high pressures10.1063/1.1589177 ↗
21. Ballistic performance of ceramic and ceramic-metal composite plates with JH1, JH2 and JHB material models10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.103469 ↗
22. Grady · 1996
23. Effect of ceramic properties and depth-of-penetration test parameters on the ballistic performance of armour ceramics10.14429/dsj.67.10664 ↗
24. On the simulation of fragmentation during the process of ceramic tile impacted by blunt projectile with SPH method in LS-DYNA
25. Influence of interfacial bonding conditions on the anti-penetration performance of ceramic/metal composite targets10.1007/s10999-019-09445-1 ↗
26. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH): an overview and recent developments10.1007/s11831-010-9040-7 ↗
27. A pseudo-spring based fracture model for SPH simulation of impact dynamics10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.03.006 ↗
28. Blast induced fracture modelling using smoothed particle hydrodynamics10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.02.001 ↗
29. Study on rock damage and failure depth under particle water-jet coupling impact10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2020.103504 ↗
30. Simulation of dynamic response of granite: A numerical approach of shock-induced damage beneath impact craters10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.09.046 ↗
31. Parametric sensitivity comparison of simulation models for flyer plate impact experiments
32. Machine learning model for predicting structural response of RC columns subjected to blast loading10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2021.104145 ↗
33. Artificial neural networks for characterising whipple shield performance10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.10.011 ↗
34. A deep material network for multiscale topology learning and accelerated nonlinear modeling of heterogeneous materials10.1016/j.cma.2018.09.020 ↗
35. Rapid prediction of cured shape types of composite laminates using a FEM-ANN method10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.111980 ↗
36. Bayesian optimization for materials design with mixed quantitative and qualitative variables
37. Deep learning approaches for mining structure-property linkages in high contrast composites from simulation datasets10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.05.014 ↗
38. Constitutive modelling of the TiB2–B4C composite by experiments, simulation and neutral network10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.05.024 ↗
39. An artificial intelligence model for ballistic performance of thin plates
40. The optimization design on metal/ceramic FGM armor with neural net and conjugate gradient method
41. Novel ideas in multi-functional ceramic armor design
42. Numerical modelling to reproduce fragmentation of a tungsten heavy alloy projectile impacting a ceramic tile: Adaptive solid mesh to the SPH technique and the cohesive law10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.10.003 ↗
43. The effect of the interlayer on the ballistic performance of ceramic/composite armors: Experimental and numerical study10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.12.005 ↗
44. Ballistic impact behaviour of newly developed armour grade steel: an experimental and numerical study10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2020.103557 ↗
45. Armor options: A comparison of the dynamic response of materials in the aluminum oxide–aluminum nitride family10.1111/j.1744-7402.2010.02488.x ↗
46. Comparison of pressure-sensitive strength models for ceramics under ultrahigh confinement10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.04.007 ↗
47. Simulating brittle and ductile response of alumina ceramics under dynamic loading10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.05.013 ↗
48. Krashanitsa · 2005
49. D.S. Cronin, K. Bui, C. Kaufmann, G. McIntosh, T. Berstad, D. Cronin, Implementation and validation of the Johnson-Holmquist ceramic material model in LS-Dyna, in: 4th European LS-Dyna Users Conference, Vol. 1, 2003, pp. 47–60.
50. Modelling of strain softening materials based on equivalent damage force10.1016/j.cma.2018.01.049 ↗
51. SPH as a nonlocal regularisation method: Solution for instabilities due to strain-softening10.1016/j.cma.2014.04.010 ↗
52. Strength properties of coors AD995 alumina in the shocked state10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2003.10.008 ↗
53. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics stability analysis10.1006/jcph.1995.1010 ↗
54. Failure phenomenology of confined ceramic targets and impacting rods
55. Micromechanical model for comminution and granular flow of brittle material under high strain rate application to penetration of ceramic targets10.1016/0734-743X(93)90108-J ↗
56. Order of influences on the ballistic resistance of armor ceramics and single crystals10.1016/j.msea.2013.12.101 ↗
57. The relation between ballastic efficiency and compressive strength of ceramic tiles10.1016/0734-743X(88)90035-8 ↗
58. Comparison of dynamic compression behavior of single crystal sapphire to polycrystalline alumina10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.10.018 ↗
59. Yield properties, phase transition, and equation of state of aluminum nitride (AlN) under shock compression up to 150 GPa10.1063/1.371749 ↗
60. A computational framework for modelling impact induced damage in ceramic and ceramic-metal composite structures10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.12.064 ↗
61. Subhash · 2021
62. A finite deformation framework for mechanism-based constitutive models of the dynamic behavior of brittle materials10.1016/j.jmps.2021.104518 ↗
63. Shock-wave compression of brittle solids10.1016/S0167-6636(98)00015-5 ↗
64. Back-spalling process of an Al2O3 ceramic plate subjected to an impact of steel ball10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.09.011 ↗
65. Residual velocity and kinetic energy of the ballistic simulations test on hardened medium carbon steel plate
66. Ballistic ceramics and analysis of their mechanical properties for armour applications: A review10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.12.095 ↗
67. Computational modelling of the effect of microstructure on the abrasive wear resistance of tungsten-carbide nickel composite coatings under sub-critical cyclic impact loading10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.01.324 ↗
68. A review of ceramics for armor applications
69. Influence of material properties on the ballistic performance of ceramics for personal body armour10.1155/2003/357637 ↗
70. Effect of the impact geometry in the ballistic trauma absorption of a ceramic multilayered armor system10.1016/j.jmrt.2018.06.019 ↗
71. Experiment assessment of the ballistic response of composite pyramidal lattice truss structures10.1016/j.compositesb.2007.02.029 ↗
72. The quasi-static and blast loading response of lattice structures10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.10.005 ↗
73. Effect of projectile nose shape on the ballistic resistance of ductile targets10.1016/j.euromechsol.2010.02.002 ↗
74. Sphere on tile ballistic impact experiment to characterize the response of soda lime glass10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.103321 ↗
75. Damage mechanisms perspective on superior ballistic performance of spinel over sapphire10.1007/s11340-012-9634-0 ↗
76. Combined finite-discrete element modelling of dynamic rock fracture and fragmentation during mining production process by blast
77. Models for the behavior of boron carbide in extreme dynamic environments10.1111/jace.18071 ↗
78. K. KMW, Ceramic materials for light-weight ceramic polymer armor systems.
79. A comparison of deep networks with ReLU activation function and linear spline-type methods10.1016/j.neunet.2018.11.005 ↗
80. Ruder · 2016
81. 3D microstructure-based finite element simulation of cold-sprayed al-al2o3 composite coatings under quasi-static compression and indentation loading
82. An extended Mohr–Coulomb model for fracture strength of intact brittle materials under ultrahigh pressures10.1111/jace.14026 ↗
83. Lamberts · 2007
84. A new tool based on artificial neural networks for the design of lightweight ceramic–metal armour against high-velocity impact of solids10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.08.009 ↗
85. Understanding RMSprop-faster neural network learning
86. Practical recommendations for gradient-based training of deep architectures
87. Masters · 2018
88. Wilkins · 1969
89. Fragmentation of an armour piercing projectile after impact on composite covered alumina tiles10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.103332 ↗
90. Effect of composite covering on ballistic fracture damage development in ceramic plates10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.09.010 ↗
91. A reformulated rate-dependent visco-elastic model for dynamic deformation and fracture of PMMA with peridynamics10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2020.103791 ↗
92. Higher-order finite elements for lumped-mass explicit modeling of high-speed impacts10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.103458 ↗
93. A survey of numerical models for hail impact analysis using explicit finite element codes10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.06.009 ↗
94. LS-DYNA keyword user’s manual
95. Mechanical behaviour of polycrystalline BeO, Al2O3 and AlN at high pressure10.1007/BF00550614 ↗
96. Shear strength of shock-loaded alumina as determined with longitudinal and transverse manganin gauges10.1063/1.339721 ↗
97. Failure mode transition in ceramics under dynamic multiaxial compression10.1023/A:1007672422700 ↗
98. Dynamic high-pressure properties of AlN ceramic as determined by flyer plate impact10.1063/1.350337 ↗
99. Impact response and analysis of several silicon carbides10.1111/j.1744-7402.2004.tb00174.x ↗
100. Intact and predamaged boron carbide strength under moderate confinement pressures10.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04931.x ↗