Dental zirconia fabricated by stereolithography: Accuracy, translucency and mechanical properties in different build orientations
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Additive manufacturing (AM) zirconia shows excellent prospects for use in clinical applications. In this work, AM zirconia samples were fabricated in horizontal (H) and upright (U) fashion using a stereolithography appearance (SLA) system. The dimensional accuracy, density, translucency, surface quality, flexural strength and fracture toughness (KIc) of the samples were then assessed. AM zirconia fabricated in a H fashion shows excellent dimensional accuracy. Samples fabricated in a U fashion exhibit a higher density (relative density 95.4%) and translucency (4.393), but H group samples exhibit a higher KIc value (12.635 ± 1.372 MPa m1/2). The flexural strengths of the samples were measured and the values were compared according to their different build orientations, surface quality and fracture modes. Manual defects that arose in the samples as a result of their separation from the build platform in which they were made were found to lead to samples with irregular surface morphologies and increased surface roughness. However, this type of defect does not affect the flexural strength of samples fabricated in a H fashion. Polished-H samples that fracture from the stress concentration area exhibit the highest flexural strength (1151.08 ± 166.41 MPa) amongst all the samples prepared in this work. However, the flexural strength of the samples prepared in a U fashion is obviously low, even after polishing (225.44 ± 46.10 MPa). The Weibull characteristic strengths and Weibull moduli of the as-sintered samples are 920.22 MPa and 6.50 for H and 219.59 MPa and 7.99 for U, respectively. Overall, it was found that the dimensional accuracy, density, translucency, surface quality and mechanical properties of materials vary according to their different build orientations.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. 3D printing of zirconia–what is the future?10.1007/s40496-019-00243-4 ↗
2. Study on surface quality, precision and mechanical properties of 3D printed ZrO2 ceramic components by laser scanning stereolithography10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.09.007 ↗
3. Computer-aided design and fabrication of dental restorations: current systems and future possibilities10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0389 ↗
4. Photo-curing 3D printing technique and its challenges
5. Three-dimensional evaluation of gaps associated with fixed dental prostheses fabricated with new technologies10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.07.002 ↗
6. Die spacer thickness reproduction for central incisor crown fabrication with combined computer-aided design and 3D printing technology: an in vitro study10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.11.004 ↗
7. Fatigue strength of Co-Cr-Mo alloy clasps prepared by selective laser melting10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.02.032 ↗
8. Fatigue properties of removable partial denture clasps fabricated by selective laser melting followed by heat treatment10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.06.010 ↗
9. Enhanced osteoblast response to porosity and resolution of additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V constructs with trabeculae-inspired porosity10.1089/3dp.2015.0038 ↗
10. Discrepancy of complete-arch titanium frameworks manufactured using selective laser melting and electron beam melting additive manufacturing technologies10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.02.010 ↗
11. Fitness accuracy and retentive forces of additive manufactured titanium clasp10.1016/j.jpor.2020.01.001 ↗
12. Preliminary fabrication and characterization of electron beam melted Ti-6Al-4V customized dental implant10.1016/j.sjbs.2016.05.001 ↗
13. Stereolithography-fabricated zirconia dental prostheses: concerns based on clinical requirements10.1080/17436753.2019.1709687 ↗
14. Light curing strategies for lithography-based additive manufacturing of customized ceramics10.1016/j.addma.2014.08.003 ↗
15. Digital light processing of zirconia prostheses with high strength and translucency for dental applications10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.07.321 ↗
16. Influence of residual monomer on cracking in ceramics fabricated by stereolithography10.1111/j.1744-7402.2010.02578.x ↗
17. Additive manufacturing of ceramics: issues, potentialities, and opportunities10.1111/jace.13700 ↗
18. Tribological performance of the pair human teeth vs 3D printed zirconia: an in vitro chewing simulation study10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103900 ↗
19. 3D-printing zirconia implants; a dream or a reality? An in-vitro study evaluating the dimensional accuracy, surface topography and mechanical properties of printed zirconia implant and discs10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.08.018 ↗
20. Ten challenges in 3D printing10.1007/s00366-015-0407-0 ↗
21. Trueness analysis of zirconia crowns fabricated with 3-dimensional printing10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.04.012 ↗
22. Schwickerath adhesion tests of porcelain veneer and stereolithographic additive-manufactured zirconia10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.03.228 ↗
23. Fractography of zirconia-specimens made using additive manufacturing (LCM) technology10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.03.018 ↗
24. Optical properties of zirconia ceramics for esthetic dental restorations: a systematic review10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.07.009 ↗
25. Accurate printing of a zirconia molar crown bridge using three-part auxiliary supports and ceramic mask projection stereolithography10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.06.111 ↗
26. Strength and adaptation of stereolithography-fabricated zirconia dental crowns: an in vitro study10.11607/ijp.6262 ↗
27. Highly translucent dental resin composites through refractive index adaption using zirconium dioxide nanoparticles and organic functionalization10.1016/j.dental.2020.07.005 ↗
28. Additive manufacturing of ceramics: a review
29. A strategy for defects healing in 3D printed ceramic compact via cold isostatic pressing: sintering kinetic window and microstructure evolution10.1111/jace.16269 ↗
30. Fractography of self-glazed zirconia with improved reliability10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.03.008 ↗
31. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80038-3 ↗
32. Effect of airborne-particle abrasion of presintered zirconia on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.12.012 ↗
33. Tachibana · 2021
34. Dental ceramic prostheses by stereolithography-based additive manufacturing: potentials and challenges10.1080/17436753.2018.1447834 ↗
35. Effect of build orientation on the manufacturing process and the properties of stereolithographic dental ceramics for crown frameworks10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.01.024 ↗
36. Preparation of alumina-toughened zirconia via 3D printing and liquid precursor infiltration: manipulation of the microstructure, the mechanical properties and the low temperature aging behavior10.1007/s10853-019-03432-9 ↗
37. Stereolithography of ceramic suspensions10.1023/A:1004899027360 ↗
38. International Organization for Standardization, ISO 23146:2012, Fine Ceramics (Advanced Ceramics, Advanced Technical Ceramics) — Test Methods for Fracture Toughness of Monolithic Ceramics — Single-Edge V-Notch Beam (SEVNB) Method.
39. International Organization for Standardization, ISO 6872:2015, Dentistry — Ceramic Materials.
40. Determination of fracture toughness of zirconia ceramics with different yttria concentrations by SEVNB method10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.04.064 ↗
41. Determination of hardness and fracture toughness of Y-TZP manufactured by digital light processing through the indentation technique10.1155/2021/6612840 ↗
42. Comparison of fracture toughness measurements for zirconia materials using two test methods10.4012/dmj.2018-361 ↗
43. Fracture toughness of zirconia with a nanometer size notch fabricated using focused ion beam milling10.1002/jbm.b.34668 ↗