A comparison between different foaming methods for the synthesis of light weight geopolymers
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Foaming to reduce the density of geopolymeric materials is increasingly being reported in the literature as it has been shown to be effective in improving their insulating properties. However, there is no consistency in foaming methods and as such this study was performed to compare methods in order to better understand their effect on the properties of geopolymers. A surfactant and two chemical foaming agents (hydrogen peroxide and aluminium powder) were added to a fly ash based geopolymer matrix. Surfactant was also combined with each of the chemical foaming agents in order to stabilise the foam in the geopolymer matrix and to reduce coarse pores. The physical, mechanical and microstructural properties of the low density geopolymers are presented and the effects of the foaming agents׳ characteristics on the hardened product is discussed, as well as the relative merits of the different procedures to synthesise the foamed geopolymer. It was found that homogeneous microstructures with small pores can be obtained by adding surfactant and hydrogen peroxide. The combination of hydrogen peroxide (0.1 wt%) and surfactant (1.0 wt%) produced geopolymer foams with density and compressive strength values of 0.94 g/cm 3 and 4.6 MPa, respectively.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Technical and commercial progress in the adoption of geopolymer cement10.1016/j.mineng.2011.09.009 ↗
2. Thermal analysis of geopolymer pastes synthesised from five fly ashes of variable composition10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2012.05.032 ↗
3. High temperature behaviour of ambient cured alkali-activated materials based on ladle slag10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.09.011 ↗
4. Costs and carbon emissions for geopolymer pastes in comparison to ordinary portland cement10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.02.010 ↗
5. Designing precursors for geopolymer cements10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02787.x ↗
6. Geopolymers10.1007/BF01912193 ↗
7. Thermal behaviour of inorganic geopolymers and composites derived from sodium polysialate10.1016/S0025-5408(02)01022-X ↗
8. Geopolymer foam concrete: an emerging material for sustainable construction10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.081 ↗
9. New building materials from fly ash-based lightweight inorganic polymer10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.06.052 ↗
10. Bulk composition and microstructure dependence of effective thermal conductivity of porous inorganic polymer cements10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2011.12.030 ↗
11. Davidovits · 2008 · 498
12. Lightweight concretes of activated metakaolin-fly ash binders, with blast furnace slag aggregates10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.12.024 ↗
13. Preparation of ceramic foams from metakaolin-based geopolymers gels
14. Effect of metallic Si addition on polymerization degree of in situ foamed alkali-aluminosilicates10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.02.104 ↗
15. Silica fume as porogent agent in geo-materials at low temperature10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2010.01.014 ↗
16. Hydrogen peroxide formation in oxygen reduction at gold electrodes: II. Alkaline Solution10.1016/0022-0728(67)85021-6 ↗
17. Geopolymers: Chemistry and Applications
18. The dynamics of capillary flow10.1103/PhysRev.17.273 ↗
19. A critical comparison of mercury porosimetry and capillary condensation pore size distributions of portland cement pastes10.1016/0008-8846(71)90058-5 ↗
20. Pore structure damage in blended cements caused by mercury intrusion10.1111/j.1151-2916.1984.tb19142.x ↗
21. Mercury porosimetry: an inappropriate method for the measurement of pore size distributions in cement-based materials10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00370-7 ↗
22. Mercury porosimetry of hardened cement pastes10.1016/S0008-8846(99)00083-6 ↗
23. Effect of drying on cement-based materials pore structure as identified by mercury intrusion porosimetry: a comparative study between oven-, vacuum-, and freeze-drying10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00594-4 ↗
24. The pore structure of cement paste blended with fly ash10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.04.012 ↗
25. The pore structure and permeability of alkali activated fly ash10.1016/j.fuel.2012.05.034 ↗
26. R.R. Lloyd, The durability of Inorganic Polymer Cements (Ph.D. thesis), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, 2008.
27. Bulk composition and microstructure dependence of effective thermal conductivity of porous inorganic polymer cements10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2011.12.030 ↗
28. ASTM C39, Standard Test Method for Compressive Strenght of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens, 2011.
29. Performance of fibre reinforced, low density metakaolin geopolymers under simulated fire conditions10.1016/j.clay.2012.10.006 ↗
30. Making foamed concretes from fly ash based on geopolymer method
31. A survey of surfactants in coatings technology10.1016/0033-0655(93)80002-R ↗
32. Spatial distribution of pores in fly ash-based inorganic polymer gels visualised by Wood׳s metal intrusion10.1016/j.micromeso.2009.05.016 ↗
33. Ashby · 2000
34. Geopolymer foams by gelcasting10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.11.011 ↗