Tendon-Driven Functionally Gradient Soft Robotic Gripper 3D Printed with Intermixed Extrudate of Hard and Soft Thermoplastics
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Fused deposition modeling (FDM) printers are some of the most common additive manufacturing (AM) systems in use today. One of their most significant drawbacks compared with alternative AM techniques is that they are unable to easily integrate multiple materials into a single process to produce gradient parts, which have different mechanical properties within a single printed object. Much of this limitation comes from the need to have single filaments as inputs to a printed part, and weak bonding between thermoplastics if they are not chemically miscible. In this work, a simple method to actively enhance the bonding strength between chemically immiscible thermoplastics using a static intermixer inserted into the nozzle of a multi-input FDM system has been demonstrated. This system was successfully used to enhance adhesion between rigid and soft, stretchable polymers, which have nearly three orders of magnitude of difference in elastic moduli. The replaceable intermixer within the print head permits direct comparison of side-by-side or intermixed coextrusion processes. The bond strength between adjacent deposited fibers in intermixed printing was found to be at least 12 times higher than that of the fibers in side-by-side printing. As a proof-of-concept, tendon-driven soft robotic fingers with functionally gradient materials produced from mechanically interlocked dissimilar polymers have been printed and characterized. The fingers printed with intermixed coextrusion of hard and soft polymers do not show any noticeable interface failure after 10,000 cycles of operation, whereas other samples printed with side-by-side coextrusion experienced layer delamination before 10,000 cycles. By using a two-tendon system, these fingers have an agonist–antagonist balanced structure to control its stiffness during operation. The soft robotic gripper fabricated from these printed fingers shows its capability to grasp irregular objects with sizes larger than the gripper holder by actuating in both inward and outward directions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Soft Robotics and Applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Robot Manipulation and Learning
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Opposite page: FDM printed gradient material soft robot grasping a wireframe printed sphere. Photo Credit: Mohammad Abu Hasan Khondoker.
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/1176232080255786510.1080/11762320802557865 ↗
2. 10.1109/100.38826310.1109/100.388263 ↗
3. 10.1109/70.47842610.1109/70.478426 ↗
4. Mutlu R Yildiz SK Alici G et al. Mechanical Stiffness Augmentation of a 3D Printed Soft Prosthetic Finger. Banff Canada: IEEE 2016; pp.7–12.10.1109/AIM.2016.7576735 ↗
5. 10.1163/15685530131719816010.1163/156855301317198160 ↗
6. 10.1088/1748-3182/6/2/02600710.1088/1748-3182/6/2/026007 ↗
7. 10.1002/adfm.20130328810.1002/adfm.201303288 ↗
8. 10.1002/adfm.20110297810.1002/adfm.201102978 ↗
9. 10.1126/science.aab012910.1126/science.aab0129 ↗
10. MacCurdy R Katzschmann R Kim Y et al. Printable Hydraulics: A Method for Fabricating Robots by 3D Co-Printing Solids and Liquids. Stockholm Sweden: IEEE 2016; pp.3878–3885.10.1109/ICRA.2016.7487576 ↗
11. Drotman D Jadhav S Karimi M et al. 3D Printed Soft Actuators for a Legged Robot Capable of Navigating Unstructured Terrain. Singapore: IEEE 2017; pp.5532–5538.10.1109/ICRA.2017.7989652 ↗
12. 10.1109/LRA.2017.271414110.1109/LRA.2017.2714141 ↗
13. 10.1088/1748-3190/10/5/05500310.1088/1748-3190/10/5/055003 ↗
14. 10.1089/soro.2014.000810.1089/soro.2014.0008 ↗
15. Srivatsan TS Sudarshan TS. Additive Manufacturing: Innovations Advances and Applications. Boca Raton FL: CRC Press 2015.10.1201/b19360 ↗
16. Zhou C Chen Y Yang Z et al. Development of a Multi-Material Mask-Image-Projection-Based Stereolithography for the Fabrication of Digital Materials. Austin TX: Laboratory for Freeform Fabrication and University of Texas at Austin 2011; pp.65–80.
17. 10.1108/1355254001033704710.1108/13552540010337047 ↗
18. 10.1108/1355254021041330110.1108/13552540210413301 ↗
19. 10.1115/1.403109710.1115/1.4031097 ↗
20. 10.1089/soro.2017.000210.1089/soro.2017.0002 ↗
21. Bruyas A Geiskopf F Renaud P. Towards Statically Balanced Complaint Joints Using Multimaterial 3D Printing. Buffalo NY: ASME 2014.10.1115/DETC2014-34532 ↗
22. 10.1109/MRA.2016.258047910.1109/MRA.2016.2580479 ↗
23. Geeetech Prusa I3 M201 Dual extruder Mixcolor 3D printer DIY kit. Available from: www.geeetech.com/geeetech-prusa-i3-m201-3d-printer-diy-kit-p-965.html Accessed on November17 2017.
24. Builder Premium Large Red. Available from: http://builder3dprinters.com/product/builder-premium-large-red. Accessed on November17 2017.
25. Govers FX. Diamond hotend makes multi-color 3D printing possible from a single nozzle. New Atlas [Internet]. 2015 [cited April 15 2015]. Available from: https://newatlas.com/diamondhotend-color-3d-printer-extruder/36950 (last accessed June25 2019).
26. 10.1063/1.172362110.1063/1.1723621 ↗
27. 10.1021/ma00244a01610.1021/ma00244a016 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0079-6700(97)00054-310.1016/S0079-6700(97)00054-3 ↗
29. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b0074010.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00740 ↗
30. 10.1021/ie503645a10.1021/ie503645a ↗
31. 10.1016/j.polymer.2012.11.04210.1016/j.polymer.2012.11.042 ↗
32. 10.1002/marc.20140020010.1002/marc.201400200 ↗
33. 10.1081/MC-12001802210.1081/MC-120018022 ↗
34. 10.1108/RPJ-03-2017-004610.1108/RPJ-03-2017-0046 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.cej.2015.10.12210.1016/j.cej.2015.10.122 ↗
36. ASTM D1708-13 Standard test method for tensile properties of plastics by use of microtensile specimens. Available from: https://www.astm.org/Standards/D1708.htm. Accessed on November17 2017.
37. 10.1007/s11668-016-0067-410.1007/s11668-016-0067-4 ↗
38. Dinwiddie RB Kunc V Lindal JM et al. Infrared Imaging of the Polymer 3D-Printing Process. Baltimore MD: SPIE 2014.10.1117/12.2053425 ↗
39. Malloy RA. Plastic Part Design for Injection Molding. Cincinnati OH: Hanser Publications 1994.
40. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.667.18110.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.667.181 ↗