journal article·2008-11

Comparative flexural behavior of four fiber reinforced cementitious composites

Dong joo Kim, Antoine E. Naaman, Sherif El-Tawil

Cement and Concrete Composites· Volume 30· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

This research investigates the flexural behavior of fiber reinforced cementitious composites (FRCC) with four different types of fibers and two volume fraction contents (0.4% and 1.2%) within a nominally identical mortar matrix (56 MPa compressive strength). The four fibers are high strength steel twisted (T-), high strength steel hooked (H-), high molecular weight polyethylene spectra (SP-), and PVA-fibers. The tests were carried out according to ASTM standards. The T-fiber specimens showed best performance in almost all aspects of behavior including load carrying capacity, energy absorption capacity and multiple cracking behavior, while the PVA-fiber specimens exhibited comparatively the worst performance in all aspects of response. The only category in which SP-fiber specimens outperformed T-fiber specimens was deflection capacity, where SP-specimens exhibited the highest deflection at maximum load. By comparing the test results to data from an additional test program involving the use of a higher strength mortar (84 MPa) with both H- and T-fibers, it is shown that, again, T-fibers perform significantly better than H-fibers in a higher strength matrix. The test results from both experimental programs were used to critique the new ASTM standard [C 1609/C 1609M-05], and a few suggestions were made for improving the applicability of the standard to deflection-hardening FRCCs.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Fire effects on concrete materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (12)

Show source-provided references
1. Naaman AE. Toughness, ductility surface energy and deflection-hardening FRC composites. In: Proceedings of JCI workshop on ductile fiber reinforced cementitious composites (DFRCC) – application and evaluation, Japan Concrete Institute, Tokyo, Japan, October 2002. p. 33–57.
2. Correlation of tensile and flexural responses of strain softening and strain hardening cement composites10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2008.01.007 ↗
3. ASTM C 1609/C 1690M-05. Standard test method for flexural performance of fiber reinforced concrete (using beam with third-point loading). American Society of Testing and Materials, January 2006. p. 1–8.
4. Fiber-type effects on the performance of steel fiber reinforced concrete
5. Fracture toughness of fiber reinforced concrete
6. Flexural toughness of steel fiber reinforced concrete
7. ASTM C 1018-97. Standard test method for flexural toughness and first-crack strength of fiber reinforced concrete (using beam with third-point loading). American Society of Testing and Materials, October 1998. p. 544–51.
8. Test methods for flexural toughness characterization of fiber reinforced concrete: some concerns and a proposition
9. Chandrangsu K, Naaman AE. Comparison of tensile and bending response of three high performance fiber reinforced cement composites. In: Naaman AE, Reinhardt HW, editors. Proceeding pro 030: high performance fiber-reinforced cement composites (HPFRCC4), RILEM Publications, June 2003. p. 259–74.
10. Proposed classification of FRC composites based on their tensile response10.1617/s11527-006-9103-2 ↗
11. Correlation of fiber dispersion, rheology and mechanical performance of FRCs10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.08.006 ↗
12. Kim D. Strain rate effect on high performance fiber reinforced cementitious composites. Ph.D. thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; 2008.