Environmental impact and life cycle assessment (LCA) of traditional and ‘green’ concretes: Literature review and theoretical calculations
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract With the current focus on sustainability, it is necessary to evaluate concrete’s environmental impact properly, especially when developing new ‘green’ concrete types. Therefore, we investigated the available literature on every step in the LCA of concrete. The adopted functional unit for which the environmental impact is calculated, influences the outcome significantly. When comparing different concrete compositions, this unit should incorporate differences in strength, durability and service life. Hence, a cradle-to-grave or modified cradle-to-gate approach is advised as system boundary. When using industrial by-products as cement replacing material in ‘green’ concrete, an economical allocation of impacts is recommended. Inventory data on energy use, CO2, PM10, SOx and NOx emissions were collected and assigned to the impact categories of the problem oriented CML 2002 and the damage oriented Eco-indicator 99 impact method. Compared to Portland cement, the impact of blast-furnace slag and fly ash is about an order of a magnitude lower.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance · Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Concrete Corrosion and Durability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Measuring the life-cycle environmental and economic performance of concrete: the BEES approach
2. The Greening of the concrete industry10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2008.12.010 ↗
3. Role of supplementary cementing materials in reducing greenhouse gas emissions
4. Humphreys · 2002
5. Industry
6. Sustainable development and climate change initiatives10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.09.008 ↗
7. A life-cycle assessment of Portland cement manufacturing: comparing the traditional process with alternative technologies10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.007 ↗
8. Hendriks CA, Worrell E, deJager D, Block K, Riemer P. Emission reduction of greenhouse gases from the cement industry. , [accessed 08/11].
9. Comparative analysis of available life cycle inventories of cement in the EU10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.12.020 ↗
10. Febelcem v.z.w. Environmental report of the Belgian cement industry 2006 (in Dutch). Brussels: Febelcem v.z.w.; 2006.
11. Role of supplementary cementing materials and superplasticizers in reducing greenhouse gas emissions
12. Price L, Worrell E, Phylipsen D. Energy use and carbon dioxide emissions in energy-intensive industries in key developing countries. In: Proceedings of the 1999 earth technologies forum. Berkeley: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; 1999. 15p.
13. Green house gas emissions due to concrete manufacture10.1065/lca2007.05.327 ↗
14. Environmental impact of cement production: detail of the different processes and cement plant variability evaluation10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.12.014 ↗
15. ATILH. Environmental inventory of French cement production. Paris: Association Technique des Liants Hydrauliques (Hydraulic Binder Industries Union); 2002.
16. Industrially interesting approaches to low-CO2 cements10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.01.021 ↗
17. Morbi A, Cangiano S, Borgarello E. Cement-based materials for sustainable development. In: Zachar J, Claisse P, Naik TR, Ganjian E, editors. Proceedings of Sessions in Honor of: Dr. Enrico Borgarello, Professor Theodore W. Bremner, Professor David W. Fowler, Professor Konstantin Kovler, Professor Koji Sakai. Milwaukee: UWM Center for By-Products Utilization; 2010. p. 1–10.
18. Use of scrap tyre as a fuel in the cement manufacturing process
19. Cement manufacture and the environment, part II: environmental challenges and opportunities10.1162/108819803766729212 ↗
20. Jacott M, Comunes F, Reed C, Taylor A, Whinfield M. Energy use in the cement industry in North America: emissions, waste generation and pollution control, 1999-2001. In: Second North American symposium on assessing the environmental effects of trade; 2003. 79p.
21. Houghton JT, Meira Filho LG, Lim B, Tréanton K, editors. Revised 1996 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, greenhouse gas inventory reference manual, vol. 3. Bracknell: Meteorological Office; 1996.
22. Pollutants emitted by a cement plant: health risks for the population living in the neighborhood10.1016/j.envres.2003.08.011 ↗
23. EPA. Emission factor documentation for AP-42, section 11.6: Portland cement manufacturing, final report, EPA Contract 68-D2-0159, MRI Project No. 4601-01; 1994.
24. EPA. Management standards proposed for cement kiln dust waste. Environmental Fact Sheet, EPA 530-F-99-023, 1999.
25. Partial replacement of fossil fuel in a cement plant: risk assessment for the population living in the neighborhood10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.07.060 ↗
26. Monitoring environmental pollutants in the vicinity of a cement plant: a temporal study10.1007/s00244-010-9628-9 ↗
27. Directive 2003/53/EC of the European parliament and the council of 18 june 2003
28. Hills · 2007
29. Experiences of environmental performance evaluation in the cement industry. Data quality of environmental performance indicators as a limiting factor for benchmarking and rating10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00126-9 ↗
30. Coal combustion products and sustainability – present and future situation in Europe
31. PCA. Cement shortage assessment the monitor, flash report: breaking analysis of the economy, construction, and cement industries; May 13, 2004.
32. NBN EN 206-1 · 2000
33. NBN B15-001. Supplement to NBN EN 206-1 – concrete – specification, performance production and confirmity. Brussels: BIN; 2004.
34. Malhorta · 2005
35. NBN B15-100. Methodology for the assessment and the validation of the fitness for use of cements or additions of type II for concrete. Brussels: NBN; 2008.
36. Vollpracht A, Brameshuber W. Performance-concept, k-value approach – which concept offers which advantages? In: Brameshuber W, editors. Proceedings of the international RILEM conference on material science (MatSci). Additions Improving Properties of Concrete (AdIPoC), vol. III. Bagneux: RILEM Publications; 2010. p. 403–11.
37. Energetics Incorporated. Energy and environmental profile of the US iron and steel industry. Prepared for US Department of Energy, Office of Industrial Technologies. DOE/EE-0229; 2000.
38. Spath · 1999
39. Concrete technology for sustainable development – overview of essential elements
40. NEN 7345. Leaching characteristics of solid earthy and stony building and waste materials. Leaching tests. Determination of the leaching of inorganic components from building and monolithic waste materials with the diffusion test. Delft: NEN;1995.
41. Directive 1998/83/EC of the European parliament and the council of 3 November 1998 on the quality of water intended for human consumption
42. NBN EN 197-1 · 2000
43. Study of the leaching behaviour of paving concretes: quantification of heavy metal content in leachates issued from tank test using demineralized water10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.06.014 ↗
44. Radon exhalation of cementitious materials made with coal fly ash: part I – scientific background and testing the cement and fly ash emanation10.1016/j.jenvrad.2005.02.004 ↗
45. Basin closure and environmental flow requirements10.1080/07900620701723729 ↗
46. WFN (Water Footprint Network). Glossary, water footprint. , [accessed 08/11].
47. Lafarge. Water and building materials. How much water for each material? [accessed 08/11].
48. A revised approach to water footprinting to make transparent the impacts of consumption and production on global freshwater scarcity10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.08.003 ↗
49. EFCA. EFCA Environmental declaration superplasticizing admixures. EFCA doc 325 ETG. , 2006 [accessed 08/11].
50. Vyncke J, Vrijders J. Recycling of C & D Waste in Belgium: State-of-the-Art and Opportunities for Technology Transfer. In: Zachar J, Claisse P, Naik TR, Ganjian E, editors. Second international conference on sustainable construction materials and technologies. Proceedings of sessions in honor of: Dr. Enrico Borgarello, Professor Theodore W. Bremner, Professor David W. Fowler, Professor Konstantin Kovler, Professor Koji Sakai. Milwaukee: UWM Center for By-Products Utilization; 2010. p. 191–201.
51. Vrijders J, Desmyter J. Stimulating a high-quality use of recycled aggregates. PA/AVP-AD/0702 (in Dutch). A study conducted by the Belgian Building Research Institute (WTCB) for the Public Waste Agency of Flanders (OVAM); September 2008.
52. Development of a depletion indicator for natural resources used in concrete10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.09.002 ↗
53. 2002
54. Steen · 1999
55. Life cycle assessment of a rock crusher10.1016/S0921-3449(99)00045-2 ↗
56. Assessing the effects of supplementary cementitious materials on the performance of low-cement roller compacted concrete pavement10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.003 ↗
57. Ecological profit for a concrete pipe factory due to self-compacting concrete technology
58. NBN EN 1992 · 2005
59. Study of two concrete mix design strategies to reach carbon mitigation objectives10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.04.001 ↗
60. Van den Heede P, Gruyaert E, Robeyst N, De Belie N. Life cycle assessment of a column supported isostatic beam in high-volume fly ash concrete (HVFA concrete). In: van Breugel K, Ye G, Yuan Y, editors. Proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on service life design for infrastructure, vol. I. Bagneux: RILEM Publications; 2010. p. 437–444.
61. Measuring the eco-efficiency of cement use10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2010.07.009 ↗
62. CSA A23.1-09/A23.2-09. Concrete materials and methods of concrete construction/test methods and standard practises for concrete. Ontario: CSA; 2009.
63. ACI 318-08. Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary. Farmington Hills: American Concrete Institute; 2008.
64. International Federation for Structural Concrete (fib). Bulletin 34. Model code for service life design. Lausanne: fib; 2006.
65. Duracrete. Probabilistic performance based durability design of concrete structures. General guidelines for durability design and redesign. Document BE95-1347/R15. Gouda: CUR; 2000.
66. Probabilistic assessment to predict the time to corrosion of steel in reinforced concrete tunnel box exposed to sea water10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.05.007 ↗
67. Concepts and requirements of durability design for concrete structures: an extensive review of CCES0110.1617/s11527-007-9276-3 ↗
68. Life-cycle cost analysis of reinforced concrete structures in marine environments10.1016/S0167-4730(03)00014-6 ↗
69. Predicting carbonation in early aged cracked concrete10.1016/j.cemconres.2005.12.019 ↗
70. Influence of cracks on the service life of concrete structures in a marine environment10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.399.153 ↗
71. ISO 14040. Environmental management – life cycle assessment – principles and framework. Geneva: ISO; 2006.
72. Van den Heede P, De Belie N. Durability related functional units for life cycle assessment of high-volume fly ash concrete. In: Zachar J, Claisse P, Naik TR, Ganjian E, editors. Proceedings of the second international conference on sustainable construction materials and technologies. Volume three of three. Milwaukee: UWM Center for By-Products Utilization; 2010. p. 583–94.
73. Braungart · 2002
74. De Schepper M, Van den Heede P, Windels C, De Belie N. Life cycle assessment of completely recyclable concrete. In: Bilek V, Keršner Z, editors. Proceedings of the 4th international conference non-traditional cement and concrete. Brno: Brno University of Technology; 2011. p. 67–76.
75. ISO 14044. Environmental management – life cycle assessment – requirements and guidelines. Geneva: ISO; 2006.
76. Desmyter J, Martin Y. The environmental impact of building materials and buildings (in Dutch). WTCB Bulletin; 2001.
77. Sensitivity of the LCA allocation procedure for BFS recycled into pavement structures10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.08.011 ↗
78. Quantitative assessment of environmental impacts of life cycle of highways10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2003)129:1(25) ↗
79. A life cycle based environmental impacts assessment of construction materials used in road construction10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.08.007 ↗
80. Inventory analysis of LCA on steel- and concrete-construction office buildings10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.10.016 ↗
81. An environmental assessment of wood and steel reinforced concrete housing construction10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.07.021 ↗
82. Comparison of environmental impacts of building structures with in situ cast floors and with precast concrete floors10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.05.017 ↗
83. Life cycle assessment applied to the comparative evaluation of single family houses in the French context10.1016/S0378-7788(00)00101-8 ↗
84. PRé Consultants bv: De Schryver A, Goedkoop M, Alvarado C, Vieira M. SimaPro training – effective LCA with SimaPro. Amsterdam: PRé Consultants bv; 2008.
85. Hanle L, Maldonado P, Onuma E, Tichy M, van Oss HG. Mineral industrial emissions. In: Eggleston HS, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K, editors. 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, vol. 3. Industrial processes and product use. Hayama: Institute for Global Environmental Strategies; 2006.
86. Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N, editors. Overview and methodology. Final Report ecoinvent v2.0 No. 1. St-Gallen: Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories; 2007. 40p.
87. A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment. Part 2: impact assessment and interpretation10.1007/s11367-008-0009-9 ↗
88. Directive 2008/98/EC of the European parliament and of the council on waste and repealing certain directives
89. Gruyaert E, De Belie N, Van den Heede P. Acid resistance of concrete containing blast-furnace slag: influence of the pore structure and hydration process. In: Alexader MG, Bertron A, editors. International RILEM TC211-PAE final conference on concrete in aggressive aqueous environments: performance, testing and modeling. Bagneux: RILEM Publications; 2009. p. 389–96.
90. LCA allocation procedure used as an initiative method for waste recycling: an application to mineral additions in concrete10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.04.001 ↗
91. Althaus · 2003
92. Dunlap · 2003
93. Dones · 2007
94. Surschiste. Production of fly ash from coal power plants. , 2009 [accessed 08/11].
95. Combining economic and environmental dimensions: value chain analysis of UK iron and steel flows10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.07.024 ↗
96. Metal Bulletin. Ferrous and non-ferrous market prices 2004-2008. [accessed 08/11].
97. Ecocem. Producer of ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS); 2008.
98. EDF. Leading the energy change. Changer l’énergie ensemble. 2008 Sustainable development report. Paris: EDF; 2008.
99. IMPACT 2002+: a new life cycle assessment methodology10.1007/BF02978505 ↗
100. Life cycle assessment of coal by-products based electric power plants10.1016/S0016-2361(03)00258-8 ↗