Fabrication and characterization of TiO2/CuS nanocomposites (Cu = 0.25, 0.50, and 0.75 M) utilized for the photocatalytic degradation of crystal violet dye
Source abstract
Abstract
TiO2, CuS, and TiO2/CuS (M= 0.25, 0.50, and 0.75) nanocomposites were synthesized using one-step hydrothermal method for the photocatalytic degradation of harmful crystal violet dye. XRD patterns of pure and composite nanoparticles revealed tetragonal and hexagonal crystal structures of TiO2anatase and CuS nanoparticles. The band gap of the TiO2/CuS nanocomposites (indirect) were reduced when compared to pure TiO2due to the formation of new fermi levels inside the band gap with the assistance of CuS nanoparticles. SEM images of TiO2and CuS nanoparticles showed spherical nanostructures, whereas TiO2/CuS nanocomposites revealed a truncated tetragonal bipyramid TiO2crystal structure on top of which spherical CuS nanoparticles were deposited. Photocatalytic absorption spectrum confirmed that TiO2/CuS nanocomposite having a molar ratio of 0.25 M exhibited the highest degradation of 78.35% in 60 min and the pseudo first-order rate constant (k) was evaluated to be 2.969 × 10–2mg/cm2.Graphical abstractTiO2/CuS nanocomposites were synthesized using facile hydrothermal method by varying the molar ratio of copper to be 0.25, 0.50, and 0.75 M. Crystal violet dye which is a potent carcinogen was used for the photocatalytic degradation of TiO2/CuS nanocomposites. Photocatalytic activity shows that TiO2/CuS nanocomposite having a molar ratio of (Cu = 0.25 M) exhibited the highest degradation of 78.35% in 60 min.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Y. Verma, Toxicol. Ind. Health. 24, 491–500 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/074823370809576910.1177/0748233708095769 ↗
2. A. Afkhami, R. Moosavi, J. Hazard. Mater. 174, 398–403 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.09.06610.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.09.066 ↗
3. M.A. Hassaan, A. El Nemr, F.F. Madkour, Egypt. J. Aquat. Res. 43, 1–9 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejar.2016.09.00410.1016/j.ejar.2016.09.004 ↗
4. A.M. Fogarty, O.H. Tuovinen, Microbiol. Rev. 55, 225–233 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1128/mr.55.2.225-233.199110.1128/mr.55.2.225-233.1991 ↗
5. W. Somasiri, X.F. Li, W.Q. Ruan, C. Jian, Bioresour. Technol. 99, 3692–3699 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.07.02410.1016/j.biortech.2007.07.024 ↗
6. J.J. O’Connor, D. Lecchini, H.J. Beck, G. Cadiou, G. Lecellier, D.J. Booth, Y. Nakamura, Oecologia 180, 11–21 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-015-3367-610.1007/s00442-015-3367-6 ↗
7. S.L. Wear, R.V. Thurber, NY Ann. Acad. Sci. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.1278510.1111/nyas.12785 ↗
8. J. Grimm, D. Bessarabov, R. Sanderson, Desalination 115(3), 285–294 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(98)00047-210.1016/S0011-9164(98)00047-2 ↗
9. R. Andreozzi, V. Caprio, A. Insola, R. Marotta, Catal. Today 53(1), 51–59 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-5861(99)00102-910.1016/S0920-5861(99)00102-9 ↗
10. L. Malaeb, G.M. Ayoub, Desalination 267(1), 1–8 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.09.00110.1016/j.desal.2010.09.001 ↗
11. W. Ding, W. Jin, S. Cao, X. Zhou, C. Wang, Q. Jiang, H. Huang, R. Tu, S.F. Han, Q. Wang, Water. Res. 160, 339–349 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.05.01410.1016/j.watres.2019.05.014 ↗
12. K. Konieczny, D. Sąkol, J. Płonka, M. Rajca, M. Bodzek, Desalination 240, 151–159 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.11.07210.1016/j.desal.2007.11.072 ↗
13. F.L. Hua, Y.F. Tsang, Y.J. Wang, S.Y. Chan, H. Chua, S.N. Sin, Chem. Eng. J. 128, 169–175 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2006.10.01710.1016/j.cej.2006.10.017 ↗
14. R. Rautenbach, R. Mellis, Desalination 95, 171–188 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-9164(94)00012-310.1016/0011-9164(94)00012-3 ↗
15. M. Hussain, R. Ceccarelli, D.L. Marchisio, D. Fino, N. Russo, F. Geobaldo, Chem. Eng. J. 157, 45–51 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.10.04310.1016/j.cej.2009.10.043 ↗
16. C.B. Ong, L.Y. Ng, A.W. Mohammad, Renew. Sustain. Energy. Rev. 81, 536–551 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.02010.1016/j.rser.2017.08.020 ↗
17. S. Panimalar, S. Logambal, R. Thambidurai, C. Inmozhi, R. Uthrakumar, A. Muthukumaran, R.A. Rasheed, M.K. Gatasheh, A. Raja, J. Kennedy, K. Kaviyarasu, Environ. Res. 205, 112560 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.11256010.1016/j.envres.2021.112560 ↗
18. S. Panimalar, M. Subash, M. Chandrasekar, R. Uthrakumar, C. Inmozhi, W.A. Al-Onazi, A.M. Al-Mohaimeed, T.W. Chen, J. Kennedy, M. Maaza, K. Kaviyarasu, Chemosphere 293, 133646 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.13364610.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133646 ↗
19. K. Kaviyarasu, C.M. Magdalane, D. Jayakumar, Y. Samson, A.K.H. Bashir, M. Maaza, D. Letsholathebe, A.H. Mahmoud, J. Kennedy, J. King. Saud. Univ. Sci. 32(2), 1516–1522 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2019.12.00610.1016/j.jksus.2019.12.006 ↗
20. L.T. Govindaraman, A. Arjunan, A. Baroutaji, J. Robinson, M. Ramadan, A.G. Olabi, Reference Module in Materials Science and Materials Engineering (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-815732-9.00116-910.1016/b978-0-12-815732-9.00116-9 ↗
21. D. Ayodhya, M. Venkatesham, A. Santoshi Kumari, G.B. Reddy, D. Ramakrishna, G. Veerabhadram, J. Exp. Nanosci. 11, 418–432 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/17458080.2015.107031210.1080/17458080.2015.1070312 ↗
22. F. Gao, X.Y. Chen, K.B. Yin, S. Dong, Z.F. Ren, F. Yuan, T. Yu, Z.G. Zou, J.M. Liu, Adv. Mater. 19, 2889–2892 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20060237710.1002/adma.200602377 ↗
23. C.N. Rao, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 40, 291–326 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pc.40.100189.00145110.1146/annurev.pc.40.100189.001451 ↗
24. J. Noh, M. Yi, S. Hwang, K.M. Im, T. Yu, J. Kim, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 33, 369–373 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2015.10.02010.1016/j.jiec.2015.10.020 ↗
25. T.A. Kandiel, L. Robben, A. Alkaim, D. Bahnemann, Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 12, 602–609 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1039/C2PP25217A10.1039/C2PP25217A ↗
26. K. Fischer, A. Gawel, D. Rosen, M. Krause, A. Abdul Latif, J. Griebel, A. Prager, A. Schulze, Catalysts 7, 209 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/catal707020910.3390/catal7070209 ↗
27. H. Dong, G. Zeng, L. Tang, C. Fan, C. Zhang, X. He, Y. He, Water. Res. 79, 128–146 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.04.03810.1016/j.watres.2015.04.038 ↗
28. N. Sreelekha, K. Subramanyam, D.A. Reddy, G. Murali, S. Ramu, K.R. Varma, R.P. Vijayalakshmi, Appl. Surf. Sci. 378, 330–340 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.04.00310.1016/j.apsusc.2016.04.003 ↗
29. D.H. Wang, L. Jia, X.L. Wu, L.Q. Lu, A.W. Xu, Nanoscale 4, 576–584 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1039/C1NR11353D10.1039/C1NR11353D ↗
30. H.T. Zhang, G. Wu, X.H. Chen, Mater. Chem. Phys. 98, 298–303 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2005.09.02410.1016/j.matchemphys.2005.09.024 ↗
31. G.H. Priya, A.A. Shaly, J.M. Linet, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2, 5790–5802 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-021-05300-210.1007/s10854-021-05300-2 ↗
32. J. Pelleg, E. Elish, D. Mogilyanski, Metall. Mater. Trans. A. 36, 3187–3194 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-005-0089-010.1007/s11661-005-0089-0 ↗
33. P.V. Raleaooa, A. Roodt, G.G. Mhlongo, D.E. Motaung, O.M. Ntwaeaborwa, Optik 153, 31–42 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2017.09.12010.1016/j.ijleo.2017.09.120 ↗
34. M.H. Farooq, I. Aslam, A. Shuaib, H.S. Anam, M. Rizwan, Q. Kanwal, B. Chem, Soc. Ethiopia. 33, 561–571 (2019). https://doi.org/10.4314/bcse.v33i3.1610.4314/bcse.v33i3.16 ↗
35. T.Ç. Taşdemirci, Vacuum 167, 189–194 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2019.05.04710.1016/j.vacuum.2019.05.047 ↗
36. L. Zhang, Y. Li, Z. Jin, K.M. Chan, C.Y. Jimmy, RSC. Adv. 5, 93226–93233 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA19458J10.1039/C5RA19458J ↗
37. S.S. Selvi, G.H. Priya, A.A. Shaly, L.A. Joseph, J.M. Linet, Appl. Phys. A. 126, 1–4 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-020-03499-110.1007/s00339-020-03499-1 ↗
38. P. Praveen, G. Viruthagiri, S. Mugundan, N. Shanmugam, Spectrochim. Acta A 117, 622–629 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2013.09.03710.1016/j.saa.2013.09.037 ↗
39. S. Yu, J. Liu, Y. Zhou, R.D. Webster, X. Yan, ACS. Sustain. Chem. Eng. 5, 1347–1357 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b0176910.1021/acssuschemeng.6b01769 ↗
40. E. Valadez-Renteria, E. Barrera-Rendon, J. Oliva, V. Rodriguez-Gonzalez, Sep. Purif. Technol. 270, 118821 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2021.11882110.1016/j.seppur.2021.118821 ↗
41. X. Jiang, Y. Xie, J. Lu, W. He, L. Zhu, Y. Qian, J. Mater. Chem. 10, 2193–2196 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1039/B002486O10.1039/B002486O ↗
42. M. Chandra, K. Bhunia, D. Pradhan, Inorg. Chem. 57, 4524–4533 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b0028310.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b00283 ↗
43. C.Z. Wen, H.B. Jiang, S.Z. Qiao, H.G. Yang, G.Q. Lu, J. Mater. Chem. 21, 7052–7061 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1039/C1JM00068C10.1039/C1JM00068C ↗
44. L. Gao, J. Du, T. Ma, Ceram. Int. 43(12), 9559–9563 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.04.09310.1016/j.ceramint.2017.04.093 ↗
45. L. Andronic, L. Isac, A. Duta, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A. 221, 30–37 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2011.04.01810.1016/j.jphotochem.2011.04.018 ↗
46. J. Ma, Q. Du, H. Ge, Q. Zhang, J. Mater. Sci. 54, 2928–2939 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-3054-110.1007/s10853-018-3054-1 ↗