journal article·2015-06-01

Using Digital Fabrication to Support Student Learning

Kimberly Corum, Joe Garofalo

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Desktop digital fabrication technologies provide students with access to concrete and virtual manipulatives, which have both been identified as useful instructional tools to support student learning in a variety of different content areas, such as mathematics. In particular, these technologies can be used to help support students' development of conceptual understandings of three-dimensional measurement. This article describes how a digital fabrication-augmented unit supported the teaching and learning of surface area. Our goal was to see how working with both virtual and concrete manipulatives affected students' development of strategies to use when solving surface area tasks. Fifth-grade students used modeling software and die cutters to print physical models (three-dimensional cubes and rectangular prisms) from digital designs, giving them access to virtual and physical manipulatives. There was substantial pretest–posttest improvement on students' performance on surface area tasks following their participation in the digital fabrication-augmented unit. Additionally, features of the software and the unit supported students' development of two strategies: (1) being aware of nonobservable faces of prisms in two-dimensional representations of three-dimensional figures and (2) keeping track of their work.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Experimental Learning in Engineering · Teaching and Learning Programming · Education and Technology Integration

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

University of Virginia

References (14)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.2307/74942310.2307/749423 ↗
2. 10.1037/a003108410.1037/a0031084 ↗
3. 10.5951/TCM.8.6.037210.5951/TCM.8.6.0372 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.00510.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.005 ↗
5. 10.1007/BF0030561910.1007/BF00305619 ↗
6. 10.2307/74944110.2307/749441 ↗
7. Mayer R. Multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press New York NY 2009.
8. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Principles and standards for school mathematics volume 1. NCTM Reston VA 2002.
9. Common Core State Standards Initiative. High school: geometry geometric measurement & dimension. www.corestandards.org/Math/Content/HSG/GMD (last accessed on April27 2015).
10. Strutchens M, , Martin W, , Kenney P. What students know about measurement: perspectives from the National Assessment of Educational Progress. In: Clements D, , Bright G (eds). Learning and teaching measurement: 2003 yearbook. NCTM, Reston, VA, 2003; pp.195–207.
11. 10.1016/j.jmathb.2006.09.00310.1016/j.jmathb.2006.09.003 ↗
12. Berry R, , Bull G, , Browning C, et al. Preliminary considerations regarding use of digital fabrication to incorporate engineering design principles in elementary mathematics education. Contemp Iss Technol Teach Educ, 2010; 10:167–172.
13. Bull G, , Garofalo J. Personal fabrication systems: from bits to atoms. Learn Lead Technol, 2009; 36:10–12.
14. Corum K, , Garofalo J. Learning about surface area through a digital fabrication-augmented unit. J Comput Math Sci Teach (in press).