journal article·2019-05Open access

Favorable Mixing Thermodynamics in Ternary Polymer Blends for Realizing High Efficiency Plastic Solar Cells

Nicola Gasparini, Simon Kahmann, Michael Salvador, Jose Dario Perea, Andreas Sperlich, Andreas Baumann, Ning Li, Stefanie Rechberger, Erdmann Spiecker, Vladimir Dyakonov, Giuseppe Portale, Maria A. Loi, Christoph J. Brabec, Tayebeh Ameri

Advanced Energy Materials· Volume 9· Issue 19

Abstract

Abstract Ternary blends with broad spectral absorption have the potential to increase charge generation in organic solar cells but feature additional complexity due to limited intermixing and electronic mismatch. Here, a model system comprising the polymers poly[5,5‐bis(2‐butyloctyl)‐(2,2‐bithiophene)‐4,4‐dicarboxylate‐alt‐5,5‐2,2‐bithiophene] (PDCBT) and PTB7‐Th and PC70BM as an electron accepting unit is presented. The power conversion efficiency (PCE) of the ternary system clearly surpasses the performance of either of the binary systems. The photophysics is governed by a fast energy transfer process from PDCBT to PTB7‐Th, followed by electron transfer at the PTB7‐Th:fullerene interface. The morphological motif in the ternary blend is characterized by polymer fibers. Based on a combination of photophysical analysis, GIWAXS measurements and calculation of the intermolecular parameter, the latter indicating a very favorable molecular affinity between PDCBT and PTB7‐Th, it is proposed that an efficient charge generation mechanism is possible because PTB7‐Th predominantly orients around PDCBT filaments, allowing energy to be effectively relayed from PDCBT to PTB7‐Th. Fullerene can be replaced by a nonfullerene acceptor without sacrifices in charge generation, achieving a PCE above 11%. These results support the idea that thermodynamic mixing and energetics of the polymer–polymer interface are critical design parameter for realizing highly efficient ternary solar cells with variable electron acceptors.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Conducting polymers and applications · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Materials for Electronics and Energy Technology (I‐MEET) Friedrich‐Alexander‐University Erlangen‐Nuremberg Martensstraße 7 91058 Erlangen Germany

Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials (ZIAM) University of Groningen Nijenborgh 4 9747 AG The Netherlands

Experimental Physics VI Julius‐Maximilian University of Würzburg 97074 Würzburg Germany

Bavarian Center for Applied Energy Research (ZAE Bayern) Magdalene‐Schoch‐Str. 3 97074 Würzburg Germany

Center for Nanoanalysis and Electron Microscopy (CENEM) Friedrich‐Alexander‐University Erlangen‐Nuremberg Cauerstraße 6 91058 Erlangen Germany

Bavarian Center for Applied Energy Research (ZAE Bayern) Immerwahrstraße 2 91058 Erlangen Germany

Chair of Physical Chemistry – Physical Chemistry and Nanoscience Department of Chemistry University of Munich (LMU) Butenandtstrasse 5‐13 (E) 81377 Munich Germany

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft · Solar Technologies go Hybrid · Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. Gasparini N. · Nat. Rev. Mater. · 2019 · 1 · 1
2. 10.1039/C5EE02641E10.1039/C5EE02641E ↗
3. 10.1002/adma.20130062310.1002/adma.201300623 ↗
4. 10.1039/C6EE02851A10.1039/C6EE02851A ↗
5. 10.1021/jacs.5b0344910.1021/jacs.5b03449 ↗
6. 10.1038/nmat479710.1038/nmat4797 ↗
7. 10.1038/ncomms1406810.1038/ncomms14068 ↗
8. 10.1002/aenm.20160254010.1002/aenm.201602540 ↗
9. 10.1039/C6EE03599J10.1039/C6EE03599J ↗
10. 10.1002/aenm.20160255210.1002/aenm.201602552 ↗
11. 10.1038/nphoton.2014.17210.1038/nphoton.2014.172 ↗
12. 10.1039/c3ee44202k10.1039/c3ee44202k ↗
13. 10.1038/ncomms832710.1038/ncomms8327 ↗
14. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.11810.1038/nenergy.2016.118 ↗
15. 10.1002/adfm.20120191310.1002/adfm.201201913 ↗
16. 10.1002/adma.20180715910.1002/adma.201807159 ↗
17. 10.1021/ja205977z10.1021/ja205977z ↗
18. 10.1002/adma.20150127510.1002/adma.201501275 ↗
19. 10.1039/C5EE00090D10.1039/C5EE00090D ↗
20. 10.1038/nphoton.2015.910.1038/nphoton.2015.9 ↗
21. 10.1002/aenm.20150152710.1002/aenm.201501527 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.01.00910.1016/j.joule.2019.01.009 ↗
23. 10.1002/marc.20130035410.1002/marc.201300354 ↗
24. 10.1039/c0cc01787f10.1039/c0cc01787f ↗
25. 10.1021/ja211597w10.1021/ja211597w ↗
26. 10.1021/ja311214310.1021/ja3112143 ↗
27. 10.1002/adma.20160206710.1002/adma.201602067 ↗
28. 10.1002/aenm.20170039010.1002/aenm.201700390 ↗
29. 10.1039/C5EE03095A10.1039/C5EE03095A ↗
30. 10.1002/aenm.20140089110.1002/aenm.201400891 ↗
31. 10.1002/aenm.20150235510.1002/aenm.201502355 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0693110.1021/acs.jpcc.5b06931 ↗
33. 10.1002/adma.20180504110.1002/adma.201805041 ↗
34. 10.1002/adma.20140149410.1002/adma.201401494 ↗
35. 10.1038/nphoton.2015.610.1038/nphoton.2015.6 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.188924010.1063/1.1889240 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.orgel.2010.07.01610.1016/j.orgel.2010.07.016 ↗
38. Nenashev A. V. · Phys. Rev. B · 2017 · 104207 · 1
39. 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.24520710.1103/PhysRevB.82.245207 ↗
40. 10.1002/aenm.20170156110.1002/aenm.201701561 ↗
41. 10.1002/aenm.20140134510.1002/aenm.201401345 ↗
42. 10.1016/S0009-2614(01)00898-310.1016/S0009-2614(01)00898-3 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.solmat.2004.02.02510.1016/j.solmat.2004.02.025 ↗
44. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b0208310.1021/acs.jpclett.6b02083 ↗
45. 10.1126/science.287.5454.83910.1126/science.287.5454.839 ↗
46. 10.1039/C8TC00909K10.1039/C8TC00909K ↗
47. 10.3389/fenrg.2016.0004010.3389/fenrg.2016.00040 ↗
48. 10.1039/C6TA08729A10.1039/C6TA08729A ↗
49. 10.1039/C7EE01403A10.1039/C7EE01403A ↗
50. 10.1039/c3cp51477c10.1039/c3cp51477c ↗
51. 10.1002/adfm.20150106210.1002/adfm.201501062 ↗
52. 10.1021/ma300811410.1021/ma3008114 ↗
53. 10.1021/acsami.7b0040110.1021/acsami.7b00401 ↗
54. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0322810.1021/acs.jpcc.7b03228 ↗
55. 10.1002/adma.20170308010.1002/adma.201703080 ↗