journal article·2015-05

Sulfate Resistance of Clay-Portland Cement and Clay High-Calcium Fly Ash Geopolymer

Patimapon Sukmak, Pre De Silva, Suksun Horpibulsuk, Prinya Chindaprasirt

Publisher page

Abstract

This paper examines the short-term resistance ability of two different cementitious systems prepared using silty clay as a major component against 5 wt% sodium sulfate and 5 wt% magnesium sulfate solutions. The two cementitious systems are clay–portland cement and clay-high calcium fly ash (FA) geopolymer. The 28-day strength of the clay-FA geopolymer is up to 1.2 times higher than that of clay-cement. The results show that the physical performance of clay-FA geopolymer when exposed to sulfate solution is better than that of clay-cement. While the geopolymer phase is prominent in the clay-FA geopolymer system, gypsum, and ettringite phases are present in both systems especially in the clay-cement system. The strength reduction in clay-cement with duration of sulfate exposure is caused by the formation of ettringite and crystallization of gypsum (observed by scanning electron microscope and X-ray diffraction) as well as the decalcification of CSH phases. There is no major change in the microstructure and pH of clay-FA geopolymer when exposed to sulfate solutions, and hence the strength reduction is insignificant. The exposure to magnesium sulfate solution causes more degradation in both clay-FA geopolymer and clay-cement system than the exposure to sodium sulfate because the CSH phases react with magnesium sulfate solution to form ettringite. The disappearance of CSH phases in both systems is observed by XRD analysis. Overall, clay-FA geopolymer show better resistance to sulfate attack than clay-cement. The clay-FA geopolymer can be considered as a green construction and building material in sulfate-rich areas.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications · Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Lecturer, School of Engineering and Resources, Walailak Univ., Tha Sala District, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand.

Lecturer, School of Arts and Sciences, Australian Catholic Univ., 8-20 Napier St., North Sydney, NSW 2059, Australia.

Professor and Chair, School of Civil Engineering, Suranaree Univ. of Technology, 111 University Ave., Muang District, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand (corresponding author).

Professor, Sustainable Infrastructure Research and Development Center, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Khon Kaen Univ., 123 Moo 16 Mittapap Rd., Nai-Muang, Muang District, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. ASTM. (2007a). “Standard test methods for compressive strength of molded soil-cement cylinders.” D1633 West Conshohocken PA.
2. ASTM. (2007b). “Standard test methods for moisture ash and organic matter of peat and other organic soils.” D7348 West Conshohocken PA.
3. ASTM. (2009). “Standard test method for density of hydraulic cement.” C188 West Conshohocken PA.
4. ASTM. (2010). “Standard test methods for specific gravity of soil solids by water pycnometer.” D854 West Conshohocken PA.
5. ASTM. (2012). “Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using modified effort [56 000 ft-lbf/ft3 (2 700 kN-m/m3)].” D1557 West Conshohocken PA.
6. ASTM. (2013). “Standard test method for length change of hydraulic-cement mortars exposed to a sulfate solution.” C 1012 West Conshohocken PA.
7. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.09.00210.1016/j.cemconres.2004.09.002 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.06.03110.1016/j.cemconres.2004.06.031 ↗
9. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:9(907)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:9(907) ↗
10. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.11.00210.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.11.002 ↗
11. 10.1144/1470-9236/11-03110.1144/1470-9236/11-031 ↗
12. 10.1007/BF0191219310.1007/BF01912193 ↗
13. Davidovits J. and Davidovics M. (2008). “Geopolymer: Room-temperature ceramic matrix for composites.” Proc. 12th Annual Conf. on Composites and Advanced Ceramic Materials: Ceramic Engineering and Science Proc. Vol. 9 Wiley 835–841.10.1002/9780470310496.ch34 ↗
14. Ferraris C. F. · 1997 · 185
15. 10.3208/sandf.48.11510.3208/sandf.48.115 ↗
16. Modified Ohio’s curves: A rapid estimation of compaction curves for coarse- and fine-grained soils10.1520/GTJ101659 ↗
17. 10.3208/sandf.46.35110.3208/sandf.46.351 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.clay.2011.10.00310.1016/j.clay.2011.10.003 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.03.01110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.03.011 ↗
20. 10.3208/sandf.49.8510.3208/sandf.49.85 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.08.00610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.08.006 ↗
22. 10.3208/sandf.51.23910.3208/sandf.51.239 ↗
23. 10.1617/s11527-012-9906-210.1617/s11527-012-9906-2 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.04.03710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.04.037 ↗
25. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000085310.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000853 ↗
26. Firing temperature and firing time influence on mechanical and physical properties of clay bricks
27. 10.1007/BF0247302210.1007/BF02473022 ↗
28. Lippiatt B. (2000). BEESRG 4.0: Building for environmental and economic sustainability technical manual and user guide.
29. 10.1139/t90-04010.1139/t90-040 ↗
30. Mehta P. H. · 2000
31. Mehta P. K. · 1993 · 105
32. Consideration on compression properties of marine clay based on the pore size distribution measurement
33. Rapid estimation of compaction parameters for field control10.1520/GTJ100009 ↗
34. 10.1007/978-94-007-1997-2_510.1007/978-94-007-1997-2_5 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.01710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.017 ↗
36. 10.1016/S0008-8846(98)00243-910.1016/S0008-8846(98)00243-9 ↗
37. 10.1520/GTJ1086010.1520/GTJ10860 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2004.08.01210.1016/j.oceaneng.2004.08.012 ↗
39. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1994)6:2(201)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1994)6:2(201) ↗
40. Mechanism of sulfate attack: A fresh look: Part 2
41. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.01.01010.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.01.010 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.fuel.2011.01.01810.1016/j.fuel.2011.01.018 ↗
43. Sridharan A. Miura N. and El-Shafei A. (2002). “The effect of pretest conditions on the physical properties of marine clays.” Proc. Int. Symp. on Lowland Technology Saga Univ. Saga Japan.
44. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.01510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.015 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.10410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.104 ↗
46. Taylor H. F. W. · 1997 · 177
47. 10.1016/S0378-7788(01)00141-410.1016/S0378-7788(01)00141-4 ↗
48. Wakely L. D. · 1993 · 239
49. Wallah S. E. and Rangan B. V. (2006). “Low calcium fly ash based geopolymer concrete: Long term properties.” Research Rep. GC2 Curtin Univ. of Technology Australia.
50. 10.1080/19373260.2010.52104810.1080/19373260.2010.521048 ↗
51. 10.1016/S1065-7355(96)90057-710.1016/S1065-7355(96)90057-7 ↗
52. Yavaniyama A. Lertsirivorakul R. and Sriboonruang V. (2005). “Effect of land use management on groundwater and soil salinization in northeast Thailand.” Workshop on Management of Tropical Sandy Soils for Sustainable Agriculture Khon Kaen Thailand.