Source abstract
Abstract
The implementation of roller-integrated continuous compaction control (CCC) technology on three types of granite residual subgrade (GRS) was evaluated in this work; the three types of GRS are cement-treated GRS, GRS with aggregate, and natural GRS. Four common roller measurement values were calculated and analyzed: compaction meter value (CMV), compaction control value (CCV), machine drive power (MDP), and acceleration amplitude (AA). Both the sand cone test and the geodetic leveling test were conducted to evaluate the soil compaction efficiency during construction. Results revealed that cement-treated GRS could be compacted more easily than untreated materials with the same compaction effort. The correlation analyses between point measurements and roller measurement values indicate that the optimum roller measurement values for the cement-treated GRS, the GRS with aggregate, and natural GRS are CMV, AA, and CMV, respectively. Meanwhile, roller measurement values strongly rely on roller operation parameters and lift thickness, especially for the cement-treated GRS.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Affiliations
Professor, Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Tongji Univ., Shanghai 201804, China.
Ph.D. Student, Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Tongji Univ., Shanghai 201804, China.
Associate Professor, Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Tongji Univ., Shanghai 201804, China (corresponding author).
Research Associate, Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Tongji Univ., Shanghai 201804, China.
Engineer Associate, Shanghai Municipal Planning and Design Institute, Co., Ltd., 609 Jianguo Rd., Shanghai 200030, China.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Adam D. and H. Brandl. 2003. “Sophisticated roller integrated continuous compaction control.” In Proc. 12th Asian Regional Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering-Geotechnical Infrastructure for the New Millennium 427–430. Singapore: World Scientific.
2. Barman M. M. Nazari S. Imran S. Commuri M. Zaman F. Beainy and D. Singh. 2014. “Application of intelligent compaction technique in real-time evaluation of compaction level during construction of subgrade.” In Proc. Transportation Research Board 93rd Annual Meeting No. 14-5183. Washington DC: Transportation Research Board.
3. Forssblad L. 1980. “Compaction meter on vibrating rollers for improved compaction control.” In Vol. 2 of Proc. Int. Conf. on Compaction 541–546. Paris: Laboratoire Central des Ponts et Chausees.
8. Kröber W. · 2001 · 189
10. Kumar S. A. M. Mazari and J. Garibay. 2016b. “Compaction quality monitoring of lime-stabilized clayey subgrade using intelligent compaction technology.” In Proc. Int. Conf. on Transportation and Development 778–790. Reston VA: ASCE.
10.1061/9780784479926.071 ↗12. Mooney M. and D. Adam. 2007. “Vibration roller integrated measurement of earthwork compaction: An overview.” In Proc. 7th Int. Symp. on Field Measurements in Geomechanics (FMGM 07). Boston: ASCE.
10.1061/40940(307)80 ↗14. Soil stiffness evaluation for compaction control of cohesionless embankments
10.1520/GTJ100971 ↗15. Tehrani F. S. 2009. “An investigation of continuous compaction control systems.” M.Sc. thesis Univ. of Delaware.
10.1201/9780203865286.ch80 ↗18. Thurner H. and Å. Sandström. 1980. “A new device for instant compaction control.” In Vol. 2 of Proc. Int. Conf. on Compaction 611–614. Paris: Laboratoire Central des Ponts et Chausees.
20. Xu Q. K. George and L. Victor. 2011. “Data analyses for hot-mix asphalt intelligent compaction.” In Proc. Transportation Research Board 90th Annual Meeting No. 11-1262. Washington DC: Transportation Research Board.