journal article·2025-11

Dynamic Resilient Modulus and Microstructure Degradation of Compacted Loess under Wetting–Drying–Freezing–Thawing Cycles

Yinuo Feng, Zheng Lu, Chuxuan Tang, Yang Zhao, Chao Pu, Wei Wang, Zhining Cheng

Publisher page

Abstract

This study investigated the impact of temperature and humidity variation on loess subgrade performance by conducting dynamic triaxial tests on compacted loess subjected to wetting–drying (WD) and wetting–drying–freezing–thawing (WDFT) cycles. The results show that the dynamic resilience modulus decreased exponentially with cycle number and was linearly related to confining pressure. Additionally, increasing confining pressure and reducing the dynamic deviator stress helped slow down the modulus reduction. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis showed that under WD cycles, the relationship between cycle number and pore area percentage was parabolic, while under WDFT cycles it was linear. As the number of cycles increased, mesopores in loess tended to shift to an irregular elliptical shape. The fractal dimension of the pore space was largely determined by mesopores. The study also found that WDFT cycles caused greater degradation of loess performance than WD cycles, as indicated by larger dominant particle inclination intervals. Overall, the coupling effects of historical temperature and humidity variations played a significant role in the degradation of loess subgrades, with WDFT cycles having a more intense impact than WD cycles.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Soil and Unsaturated Flow · Landslides and related hazards · Climate change and permafrost

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics

Univ. of Chinese Academy of Sciences

Chinese Academy of Sciences

Xinjiang Transport Planning Survey and Design Institute Co., Ltd.

Yili Transportations Investment Group Co., Ltd.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jobe.2024.10915710.1016/j.jobe.2024.109157 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2019.10284610.1016/j.coldregions.2019.102846 ↗
3. 10.1007/s10064-021-02220-710.1007/s10064-021-02220-7 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12216210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.122162 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.10653310.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106533 ↗
6. 10.1080/14680629.2022.206490610.1080/14680629.2022.2064906 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.12818710.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128187 ↗
8. 10.1002/esp.582610.1002/esp.5826 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2023.10703010.1016/j.enggeo.2023.107030 ↗
10. 10.1007/s11837-019-03440-910.1007/s11837-019-03440-9 ↗
11. 10.1007/s11440-019-00777-y10.1007/s11440-019-00777-y ↗
12. 10.1007/s11440-022-01531-710.1007/s11440-022-01531-7 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.10682710.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106827 ↗
14. 10.1155/2020/883934710.1155/2020/8839347 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.10539310.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105393 ↗
16. 10.1007/s11440-021-01427-y10.1007/s11440-021-01427-y ↗
17. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12164210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121642 ↗
18. 10.1007/s11440-023-01876-710.1007/s11440-023-01876-7 ↗
19. 10.3390/ma1717427210.3390/ma17174272 ↗
20. 10.1007/s10064-021-02536-410.1007/s10064-021-02536-4 ↗
21. 10.1155/2021/353293510.1155/2021/3532935 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.10606510.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.106065 ↗
23. 10.1061/JCRGEI.CRENG-66610.1061/JCRGEI.CRENG-666 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2023.05.00410.1016/j.jrmge.2023.05.004 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2023.10095610.1016/j.trgeo.2023.100956 ↗
26. 10.1139/cgj-2017-058210.1139/cgj-2017-0582 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2020.10303710.1016/j.coldregions.2020.103037 ↗
28. 10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-1639210.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-16392 ↗
29. 10.1007/s11440-019-00829-310.1007/s11440-019-00829-3 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2019.10278910.1016/j.coldregions.2019.102789 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.10694910.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106949 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2024.09.00510.1016/j.geotexmem.2024.09.005 ↗