journal article·2022-12Open access

Experimental Evaluation of the Fatigue Performance and Self-Healing Behavior of Nanomodified Porous Asphalt Mixtures Containing RAP Materials under the Aging Condition and Freeze–Thaw Cycle

Sina Mousavi Rad, Neda Kamboozia, Kumar Anupam, Seyed Ataollah Saed

Abstract

First, porous asphalt (PA) pavement possesses a lower strength and lifetime compared to typical dense-grade asphalt mixtures due to its large empty space structure. Second, PA pavements’ fatigue life and durability are affected significantly by climate factors; the two most critical factors being aging conditions and moisture actions. Third, because of the environmental concerns connected with producing or repairing asphalt pavements using only virgin materials, studies have recommended reusing reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) materials. On the other hand, their use in road pavement is negative to the fatigue performance of asphalt pavements, especially PA. Therefore, modifying PA mixtures containing RAP to address the mentioned issues is necessary. Researchers have found that modifying asphalt mixes using nanotechnology is one of the more effective methods. The four-point bending beam fatigue test is one of the most dependable tests to assess the fatigue performance of asphalt mixtures, and evaluating the fatigue resistance of nano-modified PA mixes containing RAP under laboratory conditions by performing this test is essential. This study aims to investigate the fatigue behavior of different compounds of PA mixtures modified with nano zinc oxide (NZ) (0%, 2%, 4%, 6%, and 8%) containing various contents of RAP materials (0%, 25%, and 50%) under normal, long-term aging, and freeze–thaw (F–T) cycle conditions. Moreover, the self-healing capability of these PA samples was evaluated using this test by performing two 24-h recovery periods following the first and second loading. It can be inferred from the result that although adding RAP and inducting long-term aging and moisture-damaged conditions negatively influenced PA mixes’ fatigue lives, incorporating NZ caused increases in these values by averages of 114%. Besides, results indicated that applied rest periods were observed to significantly impact PA specimens’ self-healing capability, resulting in longer fatigue life for them. On average, conventional and NZ-modified PA mixes with/without RAP could recover up to 32 and 48% of their fatigue resistance in all conditions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Master’s Student, School of Civil Engineering, Iran Univ. of Science and Technology, Tehran 13114-16846, Iran.

Assistant Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Iran Univ. of Science and Technology, Tehran 13114-16846, Iran (corresponding author). ORCID: .

Assistant Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Delft Univ. of Technology, Postbus 5, 2600 AA Delft, Netherlands.

Master’s Student, School of Civil Engineering, Iran Univ. of Science and Technology, Tehran 13114-16846, Iran. ORCID: .

References (64)

Show source-provided references
1. Al-Kaissi, Z. A., and O. G. Mashkoor. 2016. “Durability of porous asphalt pavement.” J. Eng. Sustainable Dev. 20 (4): 53–70.
2. 10.3141/2457-1410.3141/2457-14 ↗
3. Arshad, A. K., J. Ahmad, and K. A. Masri. 2019. “Rutting resistance of nanosilica modified porous asphalt.” Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol. 10 (1): 2274–2284.
4. 10.1088/1757-899X/271/1/01200810.1088/1757-899X/271/1/012008 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11755810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117558 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.12.05310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.12.053 ↗
7. 10.1080/14680629.2019.162011610.1080/14680629.2019.1620116 ↗
8. Bolzan P. J. Nicholls and G. Huber. 2001. “Searching for superior performing porous asphalt wearing courses.” In Proc. TRB 2001 Annual Meeting. Washington DC: Transportation Research Board National Research Council. CD-ROM.
9. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2009)135:11(852)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2009)135:11(852) ↗
10. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2006)132:2(168)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2006)132:2(168) ↗
11. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11751610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117516 ↗
12. 10.1007/s42947-019-0024-110.1007/s42947-019-0024-1 ↗
13. Francken, L. 1979. “Fatigue performance of a bituminous road mix under realistic test conditions.” Transp. Res. Rec. 712: 30–37.
14. 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.000030710.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000307 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.00710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.007 ↗
16. Guo, G., and H. Zhang. 2021. “The effect of morphology of ZnO particle on properties of asphalt binder and mixture.” Int. J. Transp. Sci. Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtst.2021.05.005.
17. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12170410.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121704 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12407710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124077 ↗
19. 10.1617/s11527-015-0566-x10.1617/s11527-015-0566-x ↗
20. HasaniNasab, S., M. Arast, and M. Zahedi. 2019. “Investigating the healing capability of asphalt modified with nano-zycotherm and Forta fibers.” Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 11 (Dec): e00235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2019.e00235.
21. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000418710.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004187 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12443310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124433 ↗
23. Kandhal, P. 2004. “Asphalt pavements mitigate tire/pavement noise.” Hot Mix Asphalt Technol. 9 (2): 22–31.
24. Kandhal, P. S. 2002. Design, construction, and maintenance of open-graded asphalt friction courses. Greenbelt, MD: National Asphalt Pavement Association.
25. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2003)15:1(75)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2003)15:1(75) ↗
26. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.20210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.202 ↗
27. Li, R., Y. Dai, P. Wang, C. Sun, J. Zhang, and J. Pei. 2017. “Evaluation of nano-ZnO dispersed state in bitumen with digital imaging processing techniques.” J. Test. Eval. 46 (3): 974–983. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20160401.10.1520/JTE20160401 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.14110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.141 ↗
29. 10.1007/978-1-4020-6250-6_1010.1007/978-1-4020-6250-6_10 ↗
30. 10.1080/10298436.2016.117556010.1080/10298436.2016.1175560 ↗
31. Malaysia, P. 2008. Standard specification for road works, section 4, flexible pavement. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Jabatan. Kerja Raya Malaysia.
32. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000060210.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000602 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.08610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.086 ↗
34. 10.11113/jt.v78.950910.11113/jt.v78.9509 ↗
35. 10.1088/1755-1315/682/1/01205510.1088/1755-1315/682/1/012055 ↗
36. 10.1080/10298436.2019.169646110.1080/10298436.2019.1696461 ↗
37. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000328410.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003284 ↗
38. 10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.000054010.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000540 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.08.01610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.08.016 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.16310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.163 ↗
41. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000401610.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004016 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12559010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125590 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.04310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.043 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11764010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117640 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.06010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.060 ↗
46. 10.1080/14680629.2011.969525910.1080/14680629.2011.9695259 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11722410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117224 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.13110.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.131 ↗
49. Van Dijk W. H. Moreaud A. Quedeville and P. Uge. 1972. “The fatigue of bitumen and bituminous mixes.” In Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on the Structural Design of Asphalt Pavements. Washington DC: National Academies of Science Engineering and Medicine.
50. Voskuilen J. L. M. and P. N. W. Verhoef. 2003. “Causes of premature ravelling failure in porous asphalt.” In Proc. 6th Int. RILEM Symp. on Performance Testing and Evaluation of Bituminous Materials 191–197. Zurich Switzerland: International Union of Laboratories and Experts in Construction Materials Systems and Structures.10.1617/2912143772.022 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.12672110.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126721 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11769410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117694 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.07.07310.1016/j.matdes.2015.07.073 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2015.12.00110.1016/j.coldregions.2015.12.001 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12081510.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120815 ↗
56. 10.3390/ma1412341510.3390/ma14123415 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12120010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121200 ↗
58. 10.1080/10298436.2019.165410510.1080/10298436.2019.1654105 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.01610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.016 ↗
60. 10.1617/s11527-014-0395-310.1617/s11527-014-0395-3 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12206610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.122066 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11701510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117015 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11834510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118345 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.18110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.181 ↗