Impact of Various Mix Design Factors on Cracking Resistance of Epoxy-Modified Recycled Asphalt Mixtures: A Sensitivity Analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
Low-temperature cracking resistance remains a critical design consideration for epoxy-modified recycled asphalt mixtures (ERAM) that incorporate high content of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP). In this study, ERAM with varying design parameters (epoxy content, gradation, asphalt content, aged asphalt ratio, RAP heating temperature, and number of RAP fractions) were subjected to three-point beam bending tests. The effects of these design variables were then analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and principal component analysis (PCA). The optimal mix formulation was finally selected through a comparison of performance, cost, and carbon emissions. The results indicate that epoxy content has the greatest impact on cracking resistance, followed by the aged asphalt ratio, asphalt content, gradation, and RAP heating temperature. The superior strength of epoxy asphalt mitigates the impact of RAP variability and permits the coarser RAP screening of two fractions. An excessively high aged asphalt ratio (greater than 50%) leads to a sharp reduction in cracking resistance. Instead of using a high epoxy content of 40%, it is more cost-effective for ERAM to adopt finer gradation and a moderate epoxy content (20% or 30%). These findings offer valuable insights into ERAM mix design and construction practices, improving its feasibility in pavement engineering.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Southeast Univ.
Jiangsu Provincial Dept. of Transportation Engineering Construction, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210004, PR China.
Nanjing Modern Multimodal Transportation Laboratory, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211100, PR China.
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO. 2016. Determining the fracture potential of asphalt mixtures using semicircular bend geometry (SCB) at intermediate temperature. AASHTO TP 124-16. Washington DC: AASHTO.
2. AASHTO. 2022. Standard method of test for quantitative extraction and recovery of asphalt binder from asphalt mixtures. AASHTO T319. Washington DC: AASHTO.
3. Al-Qadi, I., Q. Aurangzeb, S. Carpenter, W. Pine, and J. Trepanier. 2012. “Impact of high RAP contents on structural and performance properties of asphalt mixtures.” In Civil engineering studies, Illinois Center for Transportation Series. Champaign, IL: Univ. of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.
4. ASTM. 1986. Test method for viscosity of epoxy resins and related components. ASTM D638. West Conshohocken PA: ASTM.
5. ASTM. 2021a. Standard test method for tensile properties of plastics. ASTM D2393. West Conshohocken PA: ASTM.
6. ASTM. 2021b. Standard test methods for viscosity of adhesives. ASTM D1084. West Conshohocken PA: ASTM.
7. ASTM. 2022. Standard test method for density of liquid coatings inks and related products. ASTM D1475. West Conshohocken PA: ASTM.
8. 10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e0072210.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00722 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13143010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131430 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13714410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137144 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13113110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131131 ↗
12. Chinese Standard. 2004. Technical specifications for construction of highway asphalt pavements. JTG F40-2004. Beijing: Chinese Standard.
13. Chinese Standard. 2005. Test methods of aggregate for highway engineering. JTG E42-2005. Beijing: Chinese Standard.
14. Chinese Standard. 2011. Standard test methods of bitumen and bituminous mixtures for highway engineering. JTG E20-2011. Beijing: Chinese Standard.
15. Chinese Standard. 2014. General specifications of epoxy asphalt materials for paving roads and bridges. GB/T 30598-2014. Beijing: Chinese Standard.
16. 10.3141/2294-0510.3141/2294-05 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13232010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132320 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12363110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123631 ↗
19. Hammond, G., and C. Jones. 2008. Inventory of carbon & energy (ICE). Bath, UK: Sustainable Energy Research Team, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Univ. of Bath.
20. Han, W., H. Li, B. Song, Z. Zhihong, K. Zhang, and H. Nan. 2020. “Research and practice of novel epoxy asphalt recycled pavement.” Highways 65 (8): 343–345.
21. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000147010.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001470 ↗
22. 10.1007/s11709-020-0644-110.1007/s11709-020-0644-1 ↗
23. 10.1080/10298436.2020.185072110.1080/10298436.2020.1850721 ↗
24. JIS (Japanese Industrial Standards). 2021. Testing method for total amine values of amine-based hardeners of epoxide resins. JIS K 7237. Tokyo: JIS Committee.
25. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12213810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.122138 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.06110.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.061 ↗
27. 10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-1673410.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-16734 ↗
28. 10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-1533210.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-15332 ↗
29. Liu, S., H. Wang, L. Zhang, H. Chen, and J. Yang. 2022. “Study on carbon emission of epoxy recycled pavement based on LCA.” Mater. Rep. 36 (2022): 121–128.
30. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.10.07810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.10.078 ↗
31. 10.1520/JTE2015015710.1520/JTE20150157 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.16010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.160 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.12795310.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127953 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.13678010.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136780 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.12969310.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129693 ↗
36. 10.1080/10298436.2016.123427710.1080/10298436.2016.1234277 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.21010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.210 ↗
38. Qian, Z., and Y. Xue. 2022. “Influence of key factors in construction on pavement performances of epoxy asphalt concrete.” J. Traffic Transp. Eng. 16 (4): 7–27. https://doi.org/10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2016.03.003.
39. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000250610.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002506 ↗
40. 10.1007/s10973-021-10630-810.1007/s10973-021-10630-8 ↗
41. 10.1080/14680629.2023.219173910.1080/14680629.2023.2191739 ↗
42. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000440810.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004408 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.13651510.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136515 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11759410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117594 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12612210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126122 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13254910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132549 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12120010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121200 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.fuel.2014.06.03810.1016/j.fuel.2014.06.038 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11989110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119891 ↗
50. 10.1080/10298436.2014.89333110.1080/10298436.2014.893331 ↗
51. 10.3141/2370-0310.3141/2370-03 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.20210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.202 ↗
53. 10.1002/app.5507310.1002/app.55073 ↗
54. 10.3390/app1112569810.3390/app11125698 ↗
55. 10.1002/app.5234910.1002/app.52349 ↗
56. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000367810.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003678 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12144710.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121447 ↗