Porosity-Cement Ratio Controlling Strength of Artificially Cemented Clays
Source abstract
Abstract
There exists an effort to develop dosage methodologies for cement improved soils based on a rational criterion, as in concrete technology, in which the water to cement ratio plays an essential role in strength determination. This study aims to assess the strength controlling parameters of two clays with distinct coarse grained materials (silty clay and sandy clay) treated with cement and to show that the porosity/cement ratio plays a fundamental role in target strength assessment of clayey materials. The controlling parameters evaluated were the cement content, porosity, and porosity/cement ratio. A number of unconfined compression tests and suction measurements were performed for the present work. The results show that a linear function better fits the unconfined compressive strength-cement relationship. The strength increased exponentially with the reduction in porosity for the studied soil-cement mixtures. Finally, the porosity/cement ratio is shown to be a key parameter in an evaluation of the unconfined compressive strength of the clayey soils studied.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Grouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Federal Univ. of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil (corresponding author).
Ph.D. Student, Federal Univ. of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Research Assistant, Federal Univ. of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Research Assistant, Ildefonso Simıes Lopes School, Brazil.
References (13)
Show source-provided references
1. ASTM. (2006a). “Standard classification of soils for engineering purposes.” D 2487-06 Philadelphia.
2. ASTM. (2006b). “Standard test method for unconfined compressive strength of cohesive soil.” D 2166-06 Philadelphia.
3. ASTM. (2009). “Standard specification for portland cement.” C 150-09 Philadelphia.
4. Brazilian Standard Association. (1980). “Mortar and concrete—Test method for compressive strength of cylindrical specimens.” NBR 5739 Rio de Janeiro Brazil (in Portuguese).
5. 10.1680/icien.1992.1877110.1680/icien.1992.18771 ↗
6. Cemented sands under static loading10.1061/AJGEB6.0001152 ↗
7. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.000027810.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000278 ↗
8. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.000015810.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000158 ↗
9. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:2(197)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:2(197) ↗
10. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.000000810.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000008 ↗
11. Mitchell J. K. (1981). “Soil improvement—State-of-the-art report.” Proc. 10th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering Balkema Rotterdam Netherlands 509–565.
12. Mitchell J. K. · 2005 · 577
13. 10.1680/grim.1998.2.3.12510.1680/grim.1998.2.3.125 ↗