journal article·2025-06

Effect of Nanoclay on the Rheological Properties, Rutting, Fatigue, and Storage Stability of Polymer-Modified Binder

Amir Amini

Publisher page

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to determine the physical and performance properties of binders modified with styrene–butadiene–styrene (SBS) and/or nanoclay and compare the behavior of polymer-modified binders (PMB) and nanocomposite-modified binders. In this research, classical tests have been used to investigate physical and mechanical properties, and dynamic shear rheometer (DSR), bending beam rheometer (BBR), temperature sweep, multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR), linear amplitude sweep (LAS), storage stability, and aging resistance have been used to determine rheological and operational properties. The results of examining the physical properties of nanocomposite-modified binders showed that the use of nanoclay increases resistance to thermal stresses, reduces temperature sensitivity to climate changes, and improves aging resistance. These changes are directly related to the percentage of nanoparticles. The results of DSR and BBR tests showed that SBS6, SBS3/Nc6, and SBS3/Nc8 binders with performance grades similar to PG82-16 have the best performance at the operating temperature range. The results of the MSCR and temperature sweep tests showed that, due to the increase of surface interaction between nanoparticles and the polymer matrix, nanoclay reduces permanent strains and improves elastic behavior and rutting resistance of PMB. This positive effect becomes more apparent with increasing temperature, stress intensity, and percentage of nanoparticles. I of the LAS test has shown that nanoclay improves the fatigue life of PMB at strains less than 5%. The storage stability test has shown that, despite the positive effect of increasing the percentage of nanoclay on improving the compatibility of PMB, the amount of 4% nanoclay provides a favorable performance for the storage of PMB. The findings from the response surface methodology (RSM) analysis indicate that nanoclay has a significant impact on the temperature characteristics and performance of PMB. The developed model’s predicted results were found to align well with the actual laboratory results. Through the optimization process, it was recommended to use a nanoclay content ranging from 3.9% to 4.7% in order to achieve desired performance and temperature outcomes in PMB. Specifically, for cold weather conditions, a nanoclay content of 3.2% is suggested, while for hot weather and heavy traffic conditions, nanoclay contents of 4.9% and 4% were determined.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Tribology and Wear Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Islamic Azad Univ.

References (86)

Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO. 2010a. Estimating damage tolerance of asphalt binders using the linear amplitude sweep. AASHTO TP 101. Washington DC: AASHTO.
2. AASHTO. 2010b. Highway safety manual. AASHTO T 315. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
3. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000101710.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001017 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.02.02310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.02.023 ↗
5. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000246810.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002468 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.05510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.055 ↗
7. 10.1080/10916466.2016.124877510.1080/10916466.2016.1248775 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.10310.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.103 ↗
9. 10.1080/14680629.2016.127467610.1080/14680629.2016.1274676 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12094610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120946 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.05710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.057 ↗
12. ASTM. 2003. Standard practice for accelerated aging of asphalt binder using a pressurized aging vessel (PAV). ASTM D6521. West Conshohocken PA: ASTM.
13. ASTM. 2010a. Standard test method for kinematic viscosity of asphalts (bitumens). ASTM D2170. West Conshohocken PA: ASTM.
14. ASTM. 2010b. Standard test method for softening point of bitumen (ring-and-ball apparatus). ASTM D36. West Conshohocken PA: ASTM.
15. ASTM. 2010c. Standard test method for the determination of the density of non-volatile solids in liquid coatings. ASTM D1416. West Conshohocken PA: ASTM.
16. ASTM. 2013. Standard test method for melt flow rates of thermoplastics by extrusion plastometer. ASTM D1238. West Conshohocken PA: ASTM.
17. ASTM. 2015a. Standard test method for multiple stress creep and recovery (MSCR) of asphalt binder using a dynamic shear rheometer. ASTM D7405. West Conshohocken PA: ASTM.
18. ASTM. 2015b. Standard test method for viscosity determination of asphalt at elevated temperatures using a rotational viscometer. ASTM D4402. West Conshohocken PA: ASTM.
19. ASTM. 2016. Standard test method for determining the flexural creep stiffness of asphalt binder using the bending beam rheometer (BBR). ASTM D08. West Conshohocken PA: ASTM.
20. ASTM. 2017. Standard test method for penetration of bituminous materials. ASTM D5. West Conshohocken PA: ASTM.
21. ASTM. 2018. Standard test method for determining the effect of moisture on the properties of asphalt mixtures. ASTM D6648. West Conshohocken PA: ASTM.
22. ASTM. 2021a. Standard specification for performance-graded asphalt binder. ASTM D6373. West Conshohocken PA: ASTM.
23. ASTM. 2021b. Standard test method for density of semi-solid asphalts by means of a hydrometer. ASTM D70. West Conshohocken PA: ASTM.
24. ASTM. 2021c. Standard test method for rubber property—Durometer hardness. ASTM D2240. West Conshohocken PA: ASTM.
25. ASTM. 2021d. Standard test method for the determination of the composition of liquid petroleum products by gas chromatography. ASTM D5291. West Conshohocken PA: ASTM.
26. ASTM. 2022. Standard test method for effect of heat and air on a moving film of asphalt (rolling thin-film oven test). ASTM D2872. West Conshohocken PA: ASTM.
27. ASTM. 2023. Standard test method for ductility of asphalt materials. ASTM D113. West Conshohocken PA: ASTM.
28. ASTM. 2024. Standard test method for kinematic viscosity of transparent and opaque liquids (and the calculation of dynamic viscosity). ASTM D445. West Conshohocken PA: ASTM.
29. 10.1016/j.fuel.2024.13237810.1016/j.fuel.2024.132378 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2018.10.04910.1016/j.eurpolymj.2018.10.049 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12149910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121499 ↗
32. 10.1002/cjce.545078030810.1002/cjce.5450780308 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12361010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123610 ↗
34. D’Angelo, J., R. Kluttz, R. N. Dongre, K. Stephens, and L. Zanzotto. 2007. “Revision of the superpave high temperature binder specification: The multiple stress creep recovery test (with discussion).” J. Assoc. Asphalt Paving Technol. 76.
35. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.03.03910.1016/j.jclepro.2012.03.039 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12963410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129634 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.13002310.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.130023 ↗
38. Dong, F., W. Zhao, Y. Zhang, J. Wei, W. Fan, Y. Yu, and Z. Wang. 2014. “Influence of SBS and asphalt on SBS dispersion and the performance of modified asphalt.” Constr. Build. Mater. 62 (Jun): 1–7.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.03.018 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jmst.2013.04.00810.1016/j.jmst.2013.04.008 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.08.12710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.08.127 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.03.00810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.03.008 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.nanoms.2019.02.00610.1016/j.nanoms.2019.02.006 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.08.03210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.08.032 ↗
44. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000191010.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001910 ↗
45. 10.1002/9781119605843.ch1410.1002/9781119605843.ch14 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13435110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.134351 ↗
47. 10.1016/S0950-0618(97)00008-110.1016/S0950-0618(97)00008-1 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12164410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121644 ↗
49. ISO. 2017. Rubber vulcanized or thermoplastic—Determination of the specific gravity. ISO 2781. Geneva: ISO.
50. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.02210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.022 ↗
51. 10.3141/2057-0810.3141/2057-08 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.02.01510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.02.015 ↗
53. Kök, B. V., and N. Kuloğlu. 2008. “Investigation of mechanical properties of asphalt concrete containing styrene butadiene styrene.” J. Eng. Nat. Sci. 26 (1): 81–94.
54. 10.1016/j.tca.2015.07.00410.1016/j.tca.2015.07.004 ↗
55. 10.1080/14680629.2018.146584210.1080/14680629.2018.1465842 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.cis.2008.08.01110.1016/j.cis.2008.08.011 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.15810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.158 ↗
58. 10.1155/2012/26269410.1155/2012/262694 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12410810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124108 ↗
60. 10.1016/S0950-0618(01)00033-210.1016/S0950-0618(01)00033-2 ↗
61. 10.1080/14680629.2017.140848210.1080/14680629.2017.1408482 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.14510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.145 ↗
63. Mirzaiyan, D., A. Amini, and F. Jalali. 2019b. “Investigating the influence of SBS and Gilsonite on the rheological properties of asphalt binder using statistical analysis.” Int. J. Sci. Tech. Res. Eng. 4 (1): 31–41.
64. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.25210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.252 ↗
65. 10.1080/14680629.2011.64411310.1080/14680629.2011.644113 ↗
66. 10.3390/nano1004064110.3390/nano10040641 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.14610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.146 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11679610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116796 ↗
69. 10.3390/ma1004041610.3390/ma10040416 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.mser.2006.06.00110.1016/j.mser.2006.06.001 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12102810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121028 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.13463410.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134634 ↗
73. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000069010.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000690 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12547910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125479 ↗
75. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.07010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.070 ↗
76. Youtcheff J. and A. Shenoy. 2005. Evaluation of the laboratory asphalt stability test. Rep. No. FHWA-HRT-04-111. Washington DC: Transportation Research Board.
77. 10.21859/jces-0101210.21859/jces-01012 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.09910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.099 ↗
79. 10.3390/nano811088210.3390/nano8110882 ↗
80. Zeng, M., H. U. Bahia, H. Zhai, M. R. Anderson, and P. Turner. 2001. “Rheological modeling of modified asphalt binders and mixtures (with discussion).” J. Assoc. Asphalt Paving Technol. 70.
81. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11834510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118345 ↗
82. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11782810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117828 ↗
83. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.07110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.071 ↗
84. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.03910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.039 ↗
85. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000166110.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001661 ↗
86. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.10110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.101 ↗