journal article·2024-04-01Open access

Rheological Analysis of 3D Printed Elements of Acrylonitrile Butadiene and Styrene Material Using Multiparameter Ideal Body Models

Wiktor Szot

Abstract

The growing application of additive technologies in various industrial fields determines the undertaking of research in this direction. The need to study mechanical properties, including rheological properties, is necessitated by the use of additively manufactured models as utility models. Furthermore, the values of mechanical properties are affected by the technological parameters of 3D printing. One of the popular engineering materials used in 3D printing is acrylonitrile butadiene and styrene, commonly known by the abbreviated name ABS, which is quite hard and resistant to high temperatures. This article presents a study of the rheological properties of ABS material using multiparameter ideal body models. Two rheological phenomena of stress relaxation and creep were evaluated. The effects of two technological parameters, layer height and printing direction, on the resulting values of elastic moduli and dynamic viscosity coefficients were also evaluated. The elastic moduli and dynamic viscosity coefficients were calculated using the Maxwell–Wiechert and Kelvin–Voight models. The study showed the effect of layer height on rheological properties. Moreover, very good fit was obtained between the multiparameter rheological models and the experimental curves, which are shown by the average value of \overset{¯}{{χ}2}=0.001 and \overset{¯}{{R}2}=0.9991 . The presented research can be used by designers to design machine parts or car or aircraft components. Moreover, research expands knowledge of the mechanical properties of additively manufactured parts.
Source: crossref · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Injection Molding Process and Properties · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Metrology and Unconventional Manufacturing Methods, Faculty of Mechatronics and Mechanical Engineering, Kielce University of Technology, Kielce, Poland.

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.14314/polimery.2018.7.710.14314/polimery.2018.7.7 ↗
2. 10.1063/1.508598410.1063/1.5085984 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.07.73710.1016/j.matpr.2019.07.737 ↗
4. 10.1080/17452759.2018.144956510.1080/17452759.2018.1449565 ↗
5. 10.1007/s00170-019-03313-010.1007/s00170-019-03313-0 ↗
6. 10.1115/1.403671310.1115/1.4036713 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.54610.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.546 ↗
8. 10.1088/1757-899X/1235/1/01200810.1088/1757-899X/1235/1/012008 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.506649810.1063/1.5066498 ↗
10. Hiremath S, , Kumar N, , Ukey K, et al. The study of effect of speed process parameters in fused deposition modeling 3D printing for ABS material. Int J Eng Res Appl, 2020; 10(6):20–24; doi: 10.9790/9622-1006042024
11. 10.1108/RPJ-01-2020-002210.1108/RPJ-01-2020-0022 ↗
12. Shubham P, , Aggarwal C, , Joshi S. Optimization of process parameter to improve dynamic mechanical properties of 3D printed ABS polymer using Taguchi method. Int J Mech Prod Eng, 2018; 6(6):2321–2071.
13. 10.1088/2053-1591/ab6a4810.1088/2053-1591/ab6a48 ↗
14. 10.3390/polym1205106210.3390/polym12051062 ↗
15. 10.3390/polym1310155910.3390/polym13101559 ↗
16. 10.52152/spr/2021.12510.52152/spr/2021.125 ↗
17. Popovski F, , Mijakovska S, , Popovska HD, et al. Creating 3D models with 3D printing process. Int J Comput Sci Inform Technol, 2021; 13(6):59–68; doi: 10.5121/ijcsit.2021.13605
18. Cristache CM, , Totu EE. Reactive and Functional Polymers Volume Three. (Gutiérrez TJ. ed.) Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland;, 2021; doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-50457-1
19. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.10765410.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107654 ↗
20. Milovanović A, , Golubović Z, , Trajković I, et al. Influence of printing parameters on the eligibility of plane-strain fracture toughness results for PLA polymer. Proc Struct Integr, 2022; 41(June):290–297; doi: 10.1016/j.prostr.2022.05.034
21. 10.18421/TEM103-2510.18421/TEM103-25 ↗
22. Amdjadi P, , Khoshroo K, , Seifi M, et al. Mechanical properties of 3D printed reinforced polycaprolactone composite scaffolds. J Dent School;, 2020; 38:1–6; doi: 10.22037/jds.v38i1.33348
23. 10.1115/IMECE2018-8631010.1115/IMECE2018-86310 ↗
24. Sagias VD, , Giannakopoulos KI, , Stergiou C. Mechanical properties of 3D printed polymer specimens. Proc Struct Integr, 2018; 10(January):85–90; doi: 10.1016/j.prostr.2018.09.013
25. al Khawaja H, , Alabdouli H, , Alqaydi H, et al. Investigating the mechanical properties of 3D printed components. In: 2020 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET) IEEE; 2020; pp. 1–7; doi: 10.1109/ASET48392.2020.9118307
26. 10.1002/nano.20210014710.1002/nano.202100147 ↗
27. 10.35860/iarej.86230410.35860/iarej.862304 ↗
28. Seol K-S, , Zhao P, , Shin B-C, et al. Infill print parameters for mechanical properties of 3D printed PLA parts. Korean Soc Manuf Process Eng, 2018; 17(4):9–16; doi: 10.14775/ksmpe.2018.17.4.009
29. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12749610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127496 ↗
30. 10.3390/polym1204083010.3390/polym12040830 ↗
31. Kozior T. Rheological properties of polyamide PA 2200 in SLS technology. Teh Vjesn Tech Gaz, 2020; 27(4):1092–1100; doi: 10.17559/TV-20190225122204
32. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.11.03010.1016/j.compstruct.2018.11.030 ↗
33. Srinivas K Scientific A Characterization M. Stress Relaxation and Creep of Polymers and Composite Materials Kartik Srinivas Principal Engineer. Advanced Scientific and Engineering Services (AdvanSES): Ahmedabad India; 2020. Available from: https://advanses.com/stress-relaxation-and-creep/
34. Ibrulj J, , Dzaferovic E, , Obucina M. Determination of relaxation and creep modulus of polymer materials obtained by 3D printing. In: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Springer; 2020; pp. 256–266; doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-46817-0_29
35. 10.3390/polym1319327610.3390/polym13193276 ↗
36. 10.3390/aerospace903012410.3390/aerospace9030124 ↗
37. Reis PNB, , Valvez S, , Ferreira JAM. Creep and stress relaxation behaviour of 3D printed nanocomposites. Proc Struct Integr, 2022; 37(C):934–940; doi: 10.1016/j.prostr.2022.02.028
38. 10.3390/ijerph1909577510.3390/ijerph19095775 ↗
39. Rudnik M, , Hanon MM, , Szot W, et al. Tribological properties of medical material (MED610) used in 3D printing PJM technology. Teh Vjesn Tech Gaz, 2022; 29(4):1100–1108; doi: 10.17559/TV-20220111154304.
40. 10.3390/polym1403040810.3390/polym14030408 ↗
41. 10.3390/ma1421624910.3390/ma14216249 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.procs.2020.06.02310.1016/j.procs.2020.06.023 ↗
43. Stratasys Inc., Stratasys ABSplus P430 | StratasysTM. ABSplus-P430, 2014; 2.
44. 10.3390/polym1309145810.3390/polym13091458 ↗
45. Budzik G, , Przeszlowski Ł, Wieczorowski M, et al. Analysis of 3D printing parameters of gears for hybrid manufacturing. In: AIP Conference Proceedings; American Institute of Physics, Inc.; 2018; p. 140005; doi: 10.1063/1.5034997
46. 10.12700/APH.18.8.2021.8.810.12700/APH.18.8.2021.8.8 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.10918210.1016/j.compscitech.2021.109182 ↗
48. 10.3390/ma1317380510.3390/ma13173805 ↗
49. 10.3390/ma1422706210.3390/ma14227062 ↗