Effect of Printing Parameters on the Surface Roughness of 3D-Printed Melt-Cast Explosive Substitutes Based on Melt Extrusion Technology
Source abstract
Abstract
In recent years, the application of 3D printing technology in the energetic materials field has proved its ability to innovate traditional charging methods and fabricate complex structures to improve combustion/detonation performance. The melt extrusion technology is the most promising way to fabricate complex structures and multiple components of melt-cast explosives. In this study, a paraffine-based composite was used to substitute melt-cast explosives, and a Design of Experiments approach based on central composite design was adopted to investigate the influence of layer thickness, percent infill, extrusion temperature, and printing velocity on the roughness of printed samples. The results showed that layer thickness and printing velocity could significantly influence the roughness of printed specimens, and no obvious voids or cracks inside the specimens can be detected in computed tomography. In addition, a composite-shaped grain was successfully fabricated via the EAM-D-1 printer, which proved the feasibility of 3D printing melt-cast explosives with complex structures. This work will greatly help to achieve 3D printing melt-cast explosives with complex structures and higher accuracy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Energetic Materials and Combustion · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Rocket and propulsion systems research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Special Superfine Powder Engineering Technology Research Center, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, China.
Shanxi Jiangyang Chemical Co., Ltd, Taiyuan, China.
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10895710.1016/j.matdes.2020.108957 ↗
2. Chen G, , Wang D, , Hua W, et al. Simulating and predicting the part warping in fused deposition modeling by thermal–structural coupling analysis. 3D Print Addit Manuf, 2021; doi: 10.1089/3dp.2021.0119
3. 10.1089/3dp.2017.006010.1089/3dp.2017.0060 ↗
4. 10.1002/pat.478710.1002/pat.4787 ↗
5. 10.3390/polym1318310110.3390/polym13183101 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.12487410.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.124874 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.enmf.2022.04.00110.1016/j.enmf.2022.04.001 ↗
9. Li C-y, , Kong S, , Liao D-j, et al. Fabrication and characterization of mussel-inspired layer-by-layer assembled CL-20-based energetic films via micro-jet printing. Def Technol, 2021; doi: 10.1016/j.dt.2021.12.001
10. 10.1039/C8RA06610H10.1039/C8RA06610H ↗
11. 10.1016/j.dt.2019.08.01910.1016/j.dt.2019.08.019 ↗
12. 10.1557/s43578-020-00063-810.1557/s43578-020-00063-8 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10876110.1016/j.matdes.2020.108761 ↗
14. 10.1002/prep.20190017610.1002/prep.201900176 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.dt.2019.05.01310.1016/j.dt.2019.05.013 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.proci.2018.05.05210.1016/j.proci.2018.05.052 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.combustflame.2020.12.00310.1016/j.combustflame.2020.12.003 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.combustflame.2020.01.02110.1016/j.combustflame.2020.01.021 ↗
19. Fleck TJ, , Murray AK, , Gunduz IE, et al. Additive manufacturing of multifunctional reactive materials. Addit Manuf, 2017; 17:176–182; doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2017.08.008
20. 10.1016/j.combustflame.2020.09.01610.1016/j.combustflame.2020.09.016 ↗
21. 10.3390/ma1423739410.3390/ma14237394 ↗
22. 10.1002/prep.20110004710.1002/prep.201100047 ↗
23. Lei; X, , Gazi; H, , Rui; G, et al. Research status and prospect of additive manufacturing technology for energetic materials. Chin J Explos Propellants, 2022; 45(2):133–153; doi: 10.14077/j.issn.1007-7812.202107011
24. Suwei W, , Lei X, , Yubing H, et al. A review on the preparation and application of nano-energetic materials. Chin J Explos Propellants, 2021; 44(6):705–734; doi: 10.14077/j.issn.1007-7812.202112013
25. Driel CAv Straathof M Lingen JNJv. Developments in Additive Manufacturing of Energetic Materials at TNO (U). Rijswijk; 30th International Symposium on Ballistics ISB Long Beach CA USA 11–15 September 2017.10.12783/ballistics2017/16867 ↗
26. Lei X, , Qing-hua W, , Wan-hui L, et al. Preparation and performances of nano-HMX and TNT melt-cast explosives based on 3D printing technology. Acta Armamentarii, 2018; 39(7):1291–1298; doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2018.07.006
27. 10.1007/s00170-021-08593-z10.1007/s00170-021-08593-z ↗
28. 10.1016/j.cie.2021.10723810.1016/j.cie.2021.107238 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.06210.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.062 ↗
30. Singh G, , Missiaen J-M, , Bouvard D, et al. Copper extrusion 3D printing using metal injection moulding feedstock: Analysis of process parameters for green density and surface roughness optimization. Addit Manuf, 2021; 38; doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101778
31. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.08.02910.1016/j.jmapro.2018.08.029 ↗
32. 10.1007/s00170-018-3047-x10.1007/s00170-018-3047-x ↗
33. Gao G, , Xu F, , Xu J, et al. A survey of the influence of process parameters on mechanical properties of fused deposition modeling parts. Micromachines (Basel), 2022; 13(4); doi: 10.3390/mi13040553
34. 10.1080/10426914.2021.196099410.1080/10426914.2021.1960994 ↗
35. 10.1007/s10845-018-1420-010.1007/s10845-018-1420-0 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.12.06510.1016/j.jmapro.2021.12.065 ↗
37. 10.1007/s00170-019-04568-310.1007/s00170-019-04568-3 ↗
38. Pandey P, , Nayak A, , Taufik M. Evaluation of mathematical models for surface roughness prediction of PolyJet 3D printed parts. Adv Mater Process Technol, 2022; 1–10; doi: 10.1080/2374068x.2022.2097416
39. 10.3390/math810175810.3390/math8101758 ↗
40. 10.1108/RPJ-07-2020-016210.1108/RPJ-07-2020-0162 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.06.07710.1016/j.jmapro.2022.06.077 ↗
42. 10.1007/s11665-018-3784-x10.1007/s11665-018-3784-x ↗
43. 10.1007/s40964-021-00166-610.1007/s40964-021-00166-6 ↗
44. Aslani K-E, , Chaidas D, , Kechagias J, et al. Quality performance evaluation of thin walled PLA 3D printed parts using the taguchi method and grey relational analysis. J Manuf Mater Process, 2020; 4(2); doi: 10.3390/jmmp4020047
45. 10.3390/ma1108138210.3390/ma11081382 ↗
46. Heshmat M, , Maher I, , Abdelrhman Y. Surface roughness prediction of polylactic acid (PLA) products manufactured by 3D printing and post processed using a slurry impact technique: ANFIS-based modeling. Prog Addit Manuf, 2022; doi: 10.1007/s40964-022-00314-6
47. 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11099710.1016/j.matdes.2022.110997 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.dt.2021.04.01110.1016/j.dt.2021.04.011 ↗
49. 10.1080/07370652.2022.212056910.1080/07370652.2022.2120569 ↗