Microstructure, Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Three-dimensional Braided Glass Fiber Reinforced Phenolic Cryogel Composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Phenolic cryogel plates (PCPs) and three-dimensional braided glass fiber reinforced phenolic cryogel composite plates (PCCPs) were successfully fabricated by microemulsion-templated sol gel polymerization and freeze-drying methods. Then, pore morphology, mechanical and thermal properties of the composites were investigated. The experimental results showed that the aerogels made by freeze-drying method had the best microstructure. In addition, it was discovered that the compressive and tensile strength of the cryogel plates had equally increased for approximately 8 and 30 times after compounding with glass fiber. Simultaneously, the mechanical properties of the 20 wt% and 25% solid content (PCPs) achieved the optimal value compared with PCPs of other contents. Moreover, it was found that the cryogels had excellent thermostability, and their thermal conductivity decreased with the reducing of the solid contents, what's more, the joining of glass fiber had the increased the composites’ thermal conductivity to some degree. Finally, considering the requirement of low density, good mechanical and thermal performance, the 20 wt% solid content PCCP had the best comprehensive performance compared with others.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aerogels and thermal insulation · Thermal Radiation and Cooling Technologies · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Materials and Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211100, China
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Advanced Structural Materials and Application Technology, Jiangsu, China
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Tadaharu Adachi · International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives · 2015 · 53 · 5310.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.07.010 ↗
2. 10.1002/pat.312110.1002/pat.3121 ↗
3. 10.1002/pc.2303910.1002/pc.23039 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.11.01610.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.11.016 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.08.05810.1016/j.matdes.2013.08.058 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.01.05410.1016/j.indcrop.2015.01.054 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0008-6223(03)00112-X10.1016/S0008-6223(03)00112-X ↗
8. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2012.09.02410.1016/j.micromeso.2012.09.024 ↗
9. 10.1016/B0-08-043152-6/01150-510.1016/B0-08-043152-6/01150-5 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.rser.2014.03.01710.1016/j.rser.2014.03.017 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2004.10.01110.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2004.10.011 ↗
12. 10.1016/0017-9310(87)90157-810.1016/0017-9310(87)90157-8 ↗
13. 10.1016/S1872-5805(08)60020-710.1016/S1872-5805(08)60020-7 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.04510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.045 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.12.01210.1016/j.enbuild.2010.12.012 ↗
16. Winkless Laurie · Materials Today · 2014 · 17 · 316
17. Gao Guoxin · Polymer Composites · 2009 · 31 · 1223
18. 10.1016/j.matlet.2013.10.00310.1016/j.matlet.2013.10.003 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.06.01510.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.06.015 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jct.2014.06.00510.1016/j.jct.2014.06.005 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.calphad.2015.04.00810.1016/j.calphad.2015.04.008 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jue.2015.01.00610.1016/j.jue.2015.01.006 ↗
23. 10.1002/pc.2038810.1002/pc.20388 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.01.06210.1016/j.apsusc.2015.01.062 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.matlet.2011.07.11410.1016/j.matlet.2011.07.114 ↗
26. Wechsler Alfred E. · Air Force Materials Laboratory · 1965 · 34 · 65
27. Warren M. · 1992