Development and investigation of the applicability of computed tomography data-based modelling technique for polymeric high-density foams
Source abstract
Abstract
As foams have become very important in several areas and since characterizing their properties is a crucial task, a finite element simulation model for high-density closed cell foams based on computed tomography (CT) measurements is developed. The model includes realistic microstructural features like cell size distribution due to the utilization of CT data. Moreover, a ‘skin-core-skin’ microstructure resulting from the manufacturing process (injection moulding) of the foams is also considered in the model. The mechanical behaviour of the foam’s core layer under tension and compression load is characterized based on the microstructural model to develop constitutive material models of the foam. These constitutive models enable further mechanical characterization of the foam with less computational effort. Compression and bending test simulations of injection moulded foams with three different densities are validated with corresponding experimental results. Thus, conclusions can be drawn regarding the reliability, applicability and possible further extensions of the high-density foam model.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer Foaming and Composites · Cellular and Composite Structures · Composite Material Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Polymer Product Engineering, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria
Borealis Polyolefine GmbH, Linz, Austria
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/bk-1997-0669.ch00110.1021/bk-1997-0669.ch001 ↗
2. 10.1177/0021955X1246004410.1177/0021955X12460044 ↗
3. 10.1002/3527606696.ch1a10.1002/3527606696.ch1a ↗
4. Nguyen VD · 2014
5. 10.1177/0021955X2096632910.1177/0021955X20966329 ↗
6. 10.1557/PROC-207-23510.1557/PROC-207-235 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0022-5096(99)00082-410.1016/S0022-5096(99)00082-4 ↗
8. 10.1098/rspa.1957.013310.1098/rspa.1957.0133 ↗
9. Moulinec H · Comptes Rendus de l’Acade´mie des Sci Se´rie · 1994 · 318
10. 10.1016/j.cma.2013.03.02410.1016/j.cma.2013.03.024 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.02.02910.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.02.029 ↗
12. Simone AE · Acta Metall · 1998 · 46 · 4
13. 10.1017/CBO978113987832610.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗
14. 10.1007/BF0261232210.1007/BF02612322 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00276-810.1016/S0266-3538(03)00276-8 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.07.03210.1016/j.jcis.2004.07.032 ↗
17. 10.1515/crll.1908.134.19810.1515/crll.1908.134.198 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0927-0256(01)00257-910.1016/S0927-0256(01)00257-9 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0020-7683(03)00143-410.1016/S0020-7683(03)00143-4 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.01.02910.1016/j.commatsci.2017.01.029 ↗
21. 10.1209/0295-5075/111/2400210.1209/0295-5075/111/24002 ↗
22. 10.1177/0021955X21102816610.1177/0021955X211028166 ↗
23. 10.1007/s10965-021-02438-910.1007/s10965-021-02438-9 ↗
24. 10.1177/0262489321104167410.1177/02624893211041674 ↗
25. Kastner C · 2020
26. 10.1007/978-94-011-1256-7110.1007/978-94-011-1256-71 ↗
27. 10.1016/B978-075068069-1/50007-610.1016/B978-075068069-1/50007-6 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.487380910.1063/1.4873809 ↗
29. 10.1177/0021955X1141365910.1177/0021955X11413659 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.02110.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.021 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2009.12.00310.1016/j.polymertesting.2009.12.003 ↗
32. SIMULIA User Assistance 2019.
33. 10.1016/S0020-7403(97)00064-710.1016/S0020-7403(97)00064-7 ↗
34. 10.1007/s10483-015-1893-910.1007/s10483-015-1893-9 ↗