Explainable AI reveals the allosteric blind spot in protein-ligand binding predictions
Source abstract
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed prediction of protein structure and interactions, yet modeling of allosteric binding remains a persistent challenge. We develop an explainable AI framework that interrogates AI models AlphaFold3, Protenix, Boltz-2, Chai-1, and DynamicBind on rigorously stratified datasets of orthosteric and allosteric ligand-protein complexes. While AI models excel in accurate modeling of orthosteric ligand binding, a consistent and substantial performance gap observed across diverse architectures emerges in prediction of allosteric complexes. The biophysical logic for this dichotomy is unveiled through physics-based lens of the energy landscape theory. Orthosteric binding creates dominant energetic funnels via ligand-induced minimal frustration quenching, while allosteric sites preserve neutral frustration landscapes in both apo and holo protein states. By linking prediction outcomes to frustration landscapes, this study recasts AI shortcomings in prediction of allosteric ligand binding as diagnostic indicators of allostery, establishing a physics-informed framework that turns the allosteric blind spot into mechanistic insight.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Computational Drug Discovery Methods · Protein Structure and Dynamics · Machine Learning in Materials Science
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 ↗
2. Highly accurate protein structure prediction for the human proteome10.1038/s41586-021-03828-1 ↗
3. The rise of deep learning in drug discovery10.1016/j.drudis.2018.01.039 ↗
4. Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families10.1038/s41587-022-01618-2 ↗
5. Large language models for drug discovery and development10.1016/j.patter.2025.101346 ↗
6. Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer
7. Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic-level protein structure with a language model10.1126/science.ade2574 ↗
8. High-resolution de novo structure prediction from primary sequence
9. Accurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a three-track neural network10.1126/science.abj8754 ↗
10. Generalized biomolecular modeling and design with RoseTTAFold All-Atom10.1126/science.adl2528 ↗
11. De novo design of protein structure and function with RFdiffusion10.1038/s41586-023-06415-8 ↗
12. Extending the new generation of structure predictors to account for dynamics and allostery10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167007 ↗
13. Sampling alternative conformational states of transporters and receptors with AlphaFold210.7554/eLife.75751 ↗
14. SPEACH_AF: sampling protein ensembles and conformational heterogeneity with AlphaFold210.1371/journal.pcbi.1010483 ↗
15. Impact of protein conformational diversity on AlphaFold predictions10.1093/bioinformatics/btac202 ↗
16. AlphaFold2 fails to predict protein fold switching10.1002/pro.4353 ↗
17. Large-scale predictions of alternative protein conformations by AlphaFold2-based sequence association10.1038/s41467-025-60759-5 ↗
18. Predicting multiple conformations via sequence clustering and AlphaFold210.1038/s41586-023-06832-9 ↗
19. ColabFold predicts alternative protein structures from single sequences, coevolution unnecessary for AF-Cluster
20. Structure prediction of alternative protein conformations10.1038/s41467-024-51507-2 ↗
21. OpenFold: retraining AlphaFold2 yields new insights into its learning mechanisms and capacity for generalization10.1038/s41592-024-02272-z ↗
22. Uni-Fold: an open-source platform for developing protein folding models beyond AlphaFold
23. Raisinghani · J. Chem. Theor. Comput. · 2024 · 20 · 531710.1021/acs.jctc.4c00222 ↗
24. Predicting mutation-induced allosteric changes in structures and conformational ensembles of the ABL kinase using AlphaFold2 adaptations with alanine sequence scanning
25. Predicting protein conformational motions using energetic frustration analysis and AlphaFold210.1073/pnas.2410662121 ↗
26. GeoDiff: a geometric diffusion model for molecular conformation generation
27. Torsional diffusion for molecular conformer generation
28. DiffDock: diffusion steps, twists, and turns for molecular docking
29. Deep confident steps to new pockets: strategies for docking generalization
30. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 310.1038/s41586-024-07487-w ↗
31. PoseBusters: AI-based docking methods fail to generate physically valid poses or generalise to novel sequences10.1039/D3SC04185A ↗
32. AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading10.1002/jcc.21334 ↗
33. Investigating whether deep learning models for co-folding learn the physics of protein-ligand interactions10.1038/s41467-025-63947-5 ↗
34. Protenix – advancing structure prediction through a comprehensive AlphaFold3 reproduction
35. Boltz-2: towards accurate and efficient binding affinity prediction
36. The CASP16 experimental protein-ligand datasets10.1002/prot.70053 ↗
37. Assessment of pharmaceutical protein–ligand pose and affinity predictions in CASP1610.1002/prot.70061 ↗
38. Chai-1: decoding the molecular interactions of life
39. DynamicBind: predicting ligand-specific protein-ligand complex structure with a deep equivariant generative model10.1038/s41467-024-45461-2 ↗
40. EquiBind: geometric deep learning for drug binding structure prediction
41. Structure-based drug design with equivariant diffusion models10.1038/s43588-024-00737-x ↗
42. TANKBind: trigonometry-aware neural networks for drug-protein binding structure prediction
43. Robust deep learning-based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN10.1126/science.add2187 ↗
44. Simulating 500 million years of evolution with a language model10.1126/science.ads0018 ↗
45. Illuminating protein space with a programmable generative model10.1038/s41586-023-06728-8 ↗
46. Fpocket: an open source platform for ligand pocket detection10.1186/1471-2105-10-168 ↗
47. EasyMIFS and SiteHound: a toolkit for the identification of ligand-binding sites in protein structures10.1093/bioinformatics/btp562 ↗
48. CB-Dock: a web server for cavity detection-guided protein–ligand blind docking10.1038/s41401-019-0228-6 ↗
49. Identification of cavities on protein surface using multiple computational approaches for drug binding site prediction10.1093/bioinformatics/btr331 ↗
50. P2Rank: machine learning based tool for rapid and accurate prediction of ligand binding sites from protein structure10.1186/s13321-018-0285-8 ↗
51. PrankWeb 4: a modular web server for protein–ligand binding site prediction and downstream analysis10.1093/nar/gkaf421 ↗
52. Predicting ligand binding sites on protein surfaces by 3-dimensional probability density distributions of interacting atoms10.1371/journal.pone.0160315 ↗
53. DeepSite: protein-binding site predictor using 3D-convolutional neural networks10.1093/bioinformatics/btx350 ↗
54. FRSite: protein drug binding site prediction based on faster R-CNN10.1016/j.jmgm.2019.107454 ↗
55. Spatiotemporal identification of druggable binding sites using deep learning10.1038/s42003-020-01350-0 ↗
56. Recent advances in AI-driven protein-ligand interaction predictions10.1016/j.sbi.2025.103020 ↗
57. A survey of deep learning methods and tools for protein binding site prediction10.1007/978-1-0716-4662-5_5 ↗
58. Learnt representations of proteins can be used for accurate prediction of small molecule binding sites on experimentally determined and predicted protein structures10.1186/s13321-024-00821-4 ↗
59. Graph attention site prediction (GrASP): identifying druggable binding sites using graph neural networks with attention10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01698 ↗
60. Hybrid protein–ligand binding residue prediction with protein language models: does the structure matter?10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf431 ↗
61. Fine-tuning protein language models boosts predictions across diverse tasks10.1038/s41467-024-51844-2 ↗
62. Decoding the limits of deep learning in molecular docking for drug discovery10.1039/D5SC05395A ↗
63. AlloPred: prediction of allosteric pockets on proteins using normal mode perturbation analysis10.1186/s12859-015-0771-1 ↗
64. Allosite: a method for predicting allosteric sites10.1093/bioinformatics/btt399 ↗
65. Improved method for the identification and validation of allosteric sites10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00014 ↗
66. ASD2023: towards the integrating landscapes of allosteric knowledgebase10.1093/nar/gkad915 ↗
67. DeepAllo: allosteric site prediction using protein language model with multitask learning10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf294 ↗
68. Predicting locations of cryptic pockets from single protein structures using the PocketMiner graph neural network10.1038/s41467-023-36699-3 ↗
69. Combining structural and coevolution information to unveil allosteric sites10.1039/D2SC06272K ↗
70. Co-folding, the future of docking – prediction of allosteric and orthosteric ligands
71. Localizing frustration in native proteins and protein assemblies10.1073/pnas.0709915104 ↗
72. Protein Frustratometer 2: a tool to localize energetic frustration in protein molecules, now with electrostatics10.1093/nar/gkw304 ↗
73. Frustration in fuzzy protein complexes leads to interaction versatility10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c11068 ↗
74. Surveying biomolecular frustration at atomic resolution10.1038/s41467-020-19560-9 ↗
75. Fuzziness and frustration in the energy landscape of protein folding, function, and assembly10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00813 ↗
76. Frustration in physiology and molecular medicine10.1016/j.mam.2025.101362 ↗
77. The energy landscape analysis of cancer mutations in protein kinases10.1371/journal.pone.0026071 ↗
78. Landscape-based protein stability analysis and network modeling of multiple conformational states of the SARS-CoV-2 spike D614G mutant: conformational plasticity and frustration-induced allostery as energetic drivers of highly transmissible spike variants10.1021/acs.jcim.2c00124 ↗
79. Frustration-driven allosteric regulation and signal transmission in the SARS-CoV-2 spike Omicron trimer structures: a crosstalk of the Omicron mutation sites allosterically regulates tradeoffs of protein stability and conformational adaptability10.1039/D2CP01893D ↗
80. Neutral frustration landscape architecture of SARS-CoV-2 spike-antibody interfaces shapes immune evasion mechanisms for ultrapotent neutralizing antibodies and determines pathways of viral adaptation: insights from integrative computational approach10.1039/D5CP04209G ↗
81. Defining a new nomenclature for the structures of active and inactive kinases10.1073/pnas.1814279116 ↗
82. KinCore: a web resource for structural classification of protein kinases and their inhibitors10.1093/nar/gkab920 ↗
83. Data set of competitive and allosteric protein kinase inhibitors confirmed by X-ray crystallography10.1016/j.dib.2021.106816 ↗
84. AF2BIND: predicting small-molecule binding sites using the pair representation of AlphaFold210.1038/s41592-026-03011-2 ↗
85. A comprehensive dataset of protein-protein interactions and ligand binding pockets for advancing drug discovery10.1038/s41597-024-03233-z ↗
86. Evaluating generalization in protein-ligand cofolding methods10.1038/s41594-026-01797-5 ↗
87. AlphaFold predictions of fold-switched conformations are driven by structure memorization10.1038/s41467-024-51801-z ↗
88. Protein sectors: evolutionary units of three-dimensional structure10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.038 ↗
89. Origins of allostery and evolvability in proteins: a case study10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.047 ↗
90. Undersampling and the inference of coevolution in proteins10.1016/j.cels.2022.12.013 ↗
91. Predicting and decoding allosteric binding sites using protein language models and structure-based machine learning: an energy landscape-guided explainable AI framework10.1021/acs.jctc.6c00427 ↗
92. Large scale prospective evaluation of co-folding across 557 Mac1-ligand complexes and three virtual screens
93. PLINDER: the protein-ligand interactions dataset and evaluation resource
94. Benchmarking co-folding methods to predict the structures of covalent protein–ligand complexes10.1038/s41401-025-01721-5 ↗
95. TM-Align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score10.1093/nar/gki524 ↗
96. LigRMSD: a web server for automatic structure matching and RMSD calculations among identical and similar compounds in protein-ligand docking10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa018 ↗
97. DockRMSD: an open-source tool for atom mapping and RMSD calculation of symmetric molecules through graph isomorphism10.1186/s13321-019-0362-7 ↗
98. spyrmsd: symmetry-corrected RMSD calculations in Python10.1186/s13321-020-00455-2 ↗
99. OpenStructure: an integrated software framework for computational structural biology10.1107/S0907444913007051 ↗
100. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x ↗