journal article·2026-08Open access

Knowledge-graph attention network ChemFlow identifies modulators of EGFR

Swarnava Samanta, Gaurava Srivastava, Saumya Ranjan Satrusal, Bernadette Mathew, Rahul Kharkwal, Kartikay Joshi, Subhajit Ganguly, Poorna Chandrika Konathala, Nancy Jaiswal, Sagar Almad, Sai Leela Rahul Pujari, Prateek Paul, Abhishek Halder, Mohammed Farooq, Kapil Datar, Anindita Das, Jaspreet Kaur Dhanjal, Gaurav Ahuja, Dipak Datta, Debarka Sengupta

Cell Reports Physical Science· Volume 7· Issue 8

Abstract

Knowledge-graph drug-target interaction (DTI) models usually assume that test compounds are already represented in the graph, which limits their use for external chemical libraries. Here we present ChemFlow, which addresses this gap by encoding drugs from molecular structure with GATv2 and proteins from fold-specific BioKG RotatE embeddings, preserving protein-side biological context without requiring compound-side graph connectivity. We evaluate ChemFlow with node-masked held-out-compound splits, where test drugs and all incident graph edges are removed before training. Across BioKG, Therapeutic Target Database (TTD) Approved, TTD Approved + Phase, and post-2020 validation, ChemFlow improves precision-recall performance relative to sequence-based, descriptor-based, and docking baselines, including under class-imbalance settings. We then use ChemFlow to screen MedChemExpress compounds against epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Model scoring, docking, and molecular dynamics prioritize allitinib, SYHA-1813, and GNF-2. Cellular thermal shift assay (CETSA) and EGFR phosphorylation assays support direct target engagement and separate inhibitor-like from agonist-like signaling effects. ChemFlow therefore connects drug-inductive DTI prediction with experimentally testable compound prioritization.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Graph Neural Networks · Computational Drug Discovery Methods · Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (67)

Show source-provided references
1. A network integration approach for drug-target interaction prediction and computational drug repositioning from heterogeneous information10.1038/s41467-017-00680-8 ↗
2. Prediction of drug–target interaction networks from the integration of chemical and genomic spaces10.1093/bioinformatics/btn162 ↗
3. Applications of machine learning in drug discovery and development10.1038/s41573-019-0024-5 ↗
4. Large-scale prediction and testing of drug activity on side-effect targets10.1038/nature11159 ↗
5. Impact of high-throughput screening in biomedical research10.1038/nrd3368 ↗
6. Principles of early drug discovery10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.01127.x ↗
7. Estimated Research and Development Investment Needed to Bring a New Medicine to Market, 2009-201810.1001/jama.2020.1166 ↗
8. Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: New estimates of R&D costs10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.01.012 ↗
9. Clinical development success rates for investigational drugs10.1038/nbt.2786 ↗
10. Estimation of clinical trial success rates and related parameters10.1093/biostatistics/kxx069 ↗
11. Molecular Docking: A Powerful Approach for Structure-Based Drug Discovery10.2174/157340911795677602 ↗
12. Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications10.1038/nrd1549 ↗
13. A Critical Assessment of Docking Programs and Scoring Functions10.1021/jm050362n ↗
14. Recognizing Pitfalls in Virtual Screening: A Critical Review10.1021/ci200528d ↗
15. DeepDTA: deep drug–target binding affinity prediction10.1093/bioinformatics/bty593 ↗
16. GraphDTA: predicting drug–target binding affinity with graph neural networks10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa921 ↗
17. BACPI: a bi-directional attention neural network for compound–protein interaction and binding affinity prediction10.1093/bioinformatics/btac035 ↗
18. MolTrans: Molecular Interaction Transformer for drug–target interaction prediction10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa880 ↗
19. DeepPurpose: a deep learning library for drug–target interaction prediction10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa1005 ↗
20. Utilizing graph machine learning within drug discovery and development10.1093/bib/bbab159 ↗
21. Modeling polypharmacy side effects with graph convolutional networks10.1093/bioinformatics/bty294 ↗
22. NeoDTI: neural integration of neighbor information from a heterogeneous network for discovering new drug–target interactions10.1093/bioinformatics/bty543 ↗
23. Sun, Z., Deng, Z.-H., Nie, J.-Y., and Tang, J. (2019). RotatE: Knowledge Graph Embedding by Relational Rotation in Complex Space. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2019). https://openreview.net/forum?id=HkgEQnRqYQ.
24. Complex embeddings for simple link prediction
25. Translating Embeddings for Modeling Multi-relational Data
26. Yang, B., Yih, W.-t., He, X., Gao, J., and Deng, L. (2015). Embedding Entities and Relations for Learning and Inference in Knowledge Bases. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) 2015. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/embedding-entities-and-relations-for-learning-and-inference-in-knowledge-bases/
27. BioKG: A Knowledge Graph for Relational Learning On Biological Data
28. Systematic integration of biomedical knowledge prioritizes drugs for repurposing10.7554/eLife.26726 ↗
29. Discovering protein drug targets using knowledge graph embeddings10.1093/bioinformatics/btz600 ↗
30. A unified drug–target interaction prediction framework based on knowledge graph and recommendation system10.1038/s41467-021-27137-3 ↗
31. MSI-DTI: predicting drug-target interaction based on multi-source information and multi-head self-attention10.1093/bib/bbae238 ↗
32. Drug–target interaction prediction using knowledge graph embedding
33. Chemical space as a source for new drugs10.1039/c0md00020e ↗
34. The druggable genome and support for target identification and validation in drug development10.1126/scitranslmed.aag1166 ↗
35. The druggable genome10.1038/nrd892 ↗
36. Brody, S., Alon, U., and Yahav, E. (2022). How Attentive are Graph Attention Networks? In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2022). https://openreview.net/forum?id=F72ximsx7C1.
37. Different Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Agonists Produce Unique Signatures for the Recruitment of Downstream Signaling Proteins10.1074/jbc.M115.710087 ↗
38. Neural message passing for Quantum chemistry
39. A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networks10.1109/TNNLS.2020.2978386 ↗
40. Veličković, P., Cucurull, G., Casanova, A., Romero, A., Liò, P., and Bengio, Y. (2018). Graph Attention Networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2018). https://openreview.net/forum?id=rJXMpikCZ.
41. Chemprop: A Machine Learning Package for Chemical Property Prediction10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01250 ↗
42. AutoGluon-Tabular: Robust and Accurate AutoML for Structured Data
43. Pushing the Boundaries of Molecular Representation for Drug Discovery with the Graph Attention Mechanism10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b00959 ↗
44. Multimodal fusion with relational learning for molecular property prediction10.1038/s42004-025-01586-z ↗
45. Multitask joint strategies of self-supervised representation learning on biomedical networks for drug discovery10.1038/s42256-023-00640-6 ↗
46. TTD: Therapeutic Target Database describing target druggability information10.1093/nar/gkad751 ↗
47. BindingDB in 2024: a FAIR knowledgebase of protein-small molecule binding data10.1093/nar/gkae1075 ↗
48. Hit Identification and Optimization in Virtual Screening: Practical Recommendations Based on a Critical Literature Analysis10.1021/jm301916b ↗
49. QSAR-Based Virtual Screening: Advances and Applications in Drug Discovery10.3389/fphar.2018.01275 ↗
50. AutoDock Vina 1.2.0: New Docking Methods, Expanded Force Field, and Python Bindings10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00203 ↗
51. Untangling the ErbB signalling network10.1038/35052073 ↗
52. Cell Signaling by Receptor Tyrosine Kinases10.1016/j.cell.2010.06.011 ↗
53. EGFR Ligands Differentially Stabilize Receptor Dimers to Specify Signaling Kinetics10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.017 ↗
54. Different Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF) Receptor Ligands Show Distinct Kinetics and Biased or Partial Agonism for Homodimer and Heterodimer Formation10.1074/jbc.M114.586826 ↗
55. GROMACS: High performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001 ↗
56. CHARMM36m: an improved force field for folded and intrinsically disordered proteins10.1038/nmeth.4067 ↗
57. Monitoring Drug Target Engagement in Cells and Tissues Using the Cellular Thermal Shift Assay10.1126/science.1233606 ↗
58. The cellular thermal shift assay for evaluating drug target interactions in cells10.1038/nprot.2014.138 ↗
59. A molecular mechanism for the generation of ligand-dependent differential outputs by the epidermal growth factor receptor10.7554/eLife.73218 ↗
60. Small-molecule kinase inhibitors: an analysis of FDA-approved drugs10.1016/j.drudis.2015.07.008 ↗
61. Targeting cancer with small molecule kinase inhibitors10.1038/nrc2559 ↗
62. Best Practices for QSAR Model Development, Validation, and Exploitation10.1002/minf.201000061 ↗
63. QSAR Modeling: Where Have You Been? Where Are You Going To?10.1021/jm4004285 ↗
64. AST1306, A Novel Irreversible Inhibitor of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 1 and 2, Exhibits Antitumor Activity Both In Vitro and In Vivo10.1371/journal.pone.0021487 ↗
65. Molecular Basis for Redox Activation of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Kinase10.1016/j.chembiol.2016.05.017 ↗
66. Activation of EGFR by small compounds through coupling the generation of hydrogen peroxide to stable dimerization of Cu/Zn SOD110.1038/srep21088 ↗
67. GemNet: Universal Directional Graph Neural Networks for Molecules