journal article·2025-04Open access

From scientific theory to duality of predictive artificial intelligence models

Jürgen Bajorath

Cell Reports Physical Science· Volume 6· Issue 4

Abstract

Summary In studies employing explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), model explanation, interpretation, and causality are often not clearly distinguished, leading to potential misunderstandings of model performance or relevance. For predictive AI models used in the natural sciences, the path leading from model explanation and interpretation to causal reasoning is of particular importance because it bridges theory and hypothesis-driven experimental design. Selected concepts from scientific theory can be taken into consideration to generate a conceptual framework for putting predictions into scientific perspective and recognizing potential caveats. For explainable models, it is argued that the scientific rationale underlying model derivation plays a decisive role in assessing and understanding predictions and exploring causal relationships, giving rise to the notion of model duality, as introduced herein.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) · Computational Drug Discovery Methods · Machine Learning in Materials Science

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. Can we open the black box of AI?10.1038/538020a ↗
2. A contextual approach to scientific understanding10.1007/s11229-005-5000-4 ↗
3. Understanding, values, and the aims of science10.1086/710520 ↗
4. XAI—explainable artificial intelligence10.1126/scirobotics.aay7120 ↗
5. Notions of explainability and evaluation approaches for explainable artificial intelligence10.1016/j.inffus.2021.05.009 ↗
6. Explainable artificial intelligence: an analytical review10.1002/widm.1424 ↗
7. Definitions, methods, and applications in interpretable machine learning10.1073/pnas.1900654116 ↗
8. Causability and explainability of artificial intelligence in medicine10.1002/widm.1312 ↗
9. Algorithms to estimate Shapley value feature attributions10.1038/s42256-023-00657-x ↗
10. Reliable classification: learning classifiers that distinguish aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty10.1016/j.ins.2013.07.030 ↗
11. Karl Popper: Logik der Forschung. Zur Erkenntnistheorie der Modernen Naturwissenschaft10.1007/s10838-020-09531-5 ↗
12. Potential inconsistencies or artifacts in deriving and interpreting deep learning models and key criteria for scientifically sound applications in the life sciences
13. Improving the accuracy of medical diagnosis with causal machine learning10.1038/s41467-020-17419-7 ↗
14. Causal machine learning for predicting treatment outcomes10.1038/s41591-024-02902-1 ↗
15. Stable learning establishes some common ground between causal inference and machine learning10.1038/s42256-022-00445-z ↗
16. Introduction to causal inference
17. Polypharmacology: challenges and opportunities in drug discovery10.1021/jm5006463 ↗
18. Machine learning reveals that structural features distinguishing promiscuous and non-promiscuous compounds depend on target combinations10.1038/s41598-021-87042-z ↗
19. Explainable machine learning predictions of dual-target compounds reveal characteristic structural features
20. Clever Hans (the horse of Mr. Von Osten): contribution to experimental animal and human psychology
21. Unmasking Clever Hans predictors and assessing what machines really learn10.1038/s41467-019-08987-4 ↗
22. Graph neural network approaches for drug-target interactions10.1016/j.sbi.2021.102327 ↗
23. On the frustration to predict binding affinities from protein–ligand structures with deep neural networks10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c00487 ↗
24. Learning characteristics of graph neural networks predicting protein–ligand affinities10.1038/s42256-023-00756-9 ↗
25. Counterfactual thought10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033249 ↗
26. Survey of contrastive and counterfactual explanation generation methods for explainable artificial intelligence10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3051315 ↗
27. A Bayesian approach to analysing training data attribution in deep learning
28. Towards automated circuit discovery for mechanistic interpretability
29. Anchors: high-precision model-agnostic explanations
30. MolAnchor method for explaining compound predictions based on substructures
31. CLARUS: an interactive explainable AI platform for manual counterfactuals in graph neural networks
32. Recent advances in trustworthy explainable artificial intelligence: Status, challenges, and perspectives10.1109/TAI.2021.3133846 ↗
33. A value for n-person games
34. Machine learning models with distinct Shapley value explanations decouple feature attribution and interpretation for chemical compound predictions
35. On generating trustworthy counterfactual explanations10.1016/j.ins.2023.119898 ↗
36. Generation of molecular counterfactuals for explainable machine learning based on core-substituent recombination
37. Advances in natural language processing10.1126/science.aaa8685 ↗
38. Transformer technology in molecular science10.1002/wcms.1725 ↗
39. A review on the attention mechanism of deep learning10.1016/j.neucom.2021.03.091 ↗
40. Explainability for large language models: a survey
41. De novo molecular design and generative models10.1016/j.drudis.2021.05.019 ↗
42. Protein-ligand interaction prediction: an improved chemogenomics approach10.1093/bioinformatics/btn409 ↗
43. Ligand prediction from protein sequence and small molecule information using support vector machines and fingerprint descriptors10.1021/ci900004a ↗
44. Analysis of multiple compound-protein interactions reveals novel bioactive molecules10.1038/msb.2011.5 ↗
45. Calorimetry and thermodynamics in drug design10.1146/annurev.biophys.36.040306.132812 ↗
46. HyperAttentionDTI: improving drug–protein interaction prediction by sequence-based deep learning with attention mechanism10.1093/bioinformatics/btab715 ↗
47. Sequence-based drug design as a concept in computational drug design10.1038/s41467-023-39856-w ↗
48. Generative design of compounds with desired potency from target protein sequences using a multimodal biochemical language model10.1186/s13321-024-00852-x ↗
49. Guiding questions to avoid data leakage in biological machine learning applications10.1038/s41592-024-02362-y ↗
50. Machine learning for molecular and materials science10.1038/s41586-018-0337-2 ↗