Thermodynamic loss analysis of a liquid-sorbent direct air carbon capture plant
Source abstract
Abstract
Direct air capture of CO2 is often presented as a promising technology to help mitigate climate change, although proposed processes are highly energy intensive. We analyze Carbon Engineering’s 1 Mt-CO2/year natural-gas-powered direct air capture (DAC) process, which requires 273.2 MW per plant, where we find that 252 MW are irreversibly lost, corresponding to a second-law efficiency of 7.8%. Our component-level analysis details the mechanisms by which these losses of thermodynamic work potential occur in the most energy-intensive plant segments. Here, we emphasize the effects of chemical exergy dissipation in the air contactor, where stored chemical exergy is released as low-grade heat into the environment. Other major losses occur in the calciner and its preheat cyclones due to the high temperature demanded by its internal chemical reaction, as well as in the water knockout system, CO2 compression system, and power island. Finally, we illustrate the issues arising from the use of natural gas as a feedstock for heat and power, and suggest directions to pursue for further analysis and process improvements, which we consider imperative to make this DAC process a viable option for large-scale CO2 removal toward IPCC targets.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies · Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics · CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Rogelj · 2018
2. Recent advances in carbon capture storage and utilisation technologies: a review10.1007/s10311-020-01133-3 ↗
3. A process for capturing CO2 from the atmosphere10.1016/j.joule.2018.05.006 ↗
4. 2019
5. TheWorld Bank, Consumer price index (2010 = 100) - United States. url: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/FP.CPI.TOTL? locations=US
6. The World Bank, GDP (constant 2010 US$). url: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD
7. Struchtrup · 2014
8. Dlugokencky · 2021
9. What future for carbon capture and sequestration?10.1021/es012307j ↗
10. A simple thermodynamic tool for assessing energy requirements for carbon capture using solid or liquid sorbents10.1016/j.ijggc.2020.102986 ↗
11. A review of direct air capture (DAC): scaling up commercial technologies and innovating for the future10.1088/2516-1083/abf1ce ↗
12. A comparative energy and costs assessment and optimization for direct air capture technologies10.1016/j.joule.2021.05.023 ↗
13. Long-Innes · 2021
14. Optimization of intercooling compression in CO2 capture systems10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2008.08.010 ↗
15. A new equation of state for carbon dioxide covering the fluid region from the triple-point temperature to 1100 K at pressures up to 800 MPa10.1063/1.555991 ↗
16. Van Wagener · 2011
17. Carbon dioxide storage through mineral carbonation10.1038/s43017-019-0011-8 ↗
18. Natural gas vs. Electricity for solvent-based direct air capture10.3389/fclim.2020.618644 ↗
19. Linstrom · 1997 · 69
20. The high-temperature heat capacity of natural calcite (CaCO3)10.1007/BF00309451 ↗
21. Cengel · 1997