journal article·2025-12-18

Robosense 3.0: CERA III Adaptive Robotic Clay Printing

Eda Begum Birol, Teng Teng, Mahshid Moghadasi, Alexia Asgari, Kevin Guo, Karolina Piorko, Veronika Varga, Jenny E. Sabin

Publisher page

Abstract

This article presents a streamlined design pipeline that emphasizes designer agency and human–robot collaboration within robotic clay additive manufacturing processes. We introduce novel hardware and software to produce high-resolution ceramic architectural components at scale. 3D printing of clay allows for increased geometric complexity, facilitating a design approach whereby materials are expensive but form is cheap. This technology shows transformative potential for the architectural design and construction industries, allowing for greater freedom in form generation and enhanced functional efficiency. In addition, extrusion-based additive manufacturing of clay—a historically significant architectural material with environmental benefits—shows promise in revitalizing and redefining this material in both ornamental and structural applications. However, several critical challenges remain in the integration of clay extrusion into architecture and construction. Key among these is the trade-off between scale and resolution and the limited avenues for designer input and intervention during production. This article aims to address these challenges by presenting integrated workflows that detail a two-step mechanical extrusion assembly and associated software packages for motor calibration. Furthermore, we present software that enables real-time designer-led toolpath adaptation. The proposed extruder system builds a two-step extruder assembly with decoupled control of the extrusion and feeding mechanisms, with precise mathematical calibration of each to expand the achievable range of scales and resolution in printed prototypes. In addition, we challenge the pursuit of fully automated robotic construction by highlighting opportunities for real-time designer input during production, thereby increasing designer agency in all phases of design. As a result of our integrative research, we describe a workflow for developing modularized extrusion assemblies for robotically controlled additive manufacturing. In addition, we release two Grasshopper components, Pulse Control and DynPath, that achieve motor calibration in modulated clay assemblies and real-time motion intervention during fabrication, respectively. Finally, we present printed assembly prototypes and their design possibilities in an integrative framework.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence · Architecture and Computational Design

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Architecture, College of Architecture, Art, and Planning, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.

Department of Architecture, Stuart Weitzman School of Design, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, College of Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.

Department of Design Tech, College of Architecture, Art, and Planning, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.22260/ISARC2011/001010.22260/ISARC2011/0010 ↗
2. 2.Cabay E. TerraPerforma—Institute for Advanced Architecture of Catalonia. n.d. Available from: https://iaac.net/project/terraperforma/ [Last accessed: November6 2024].
3. 3.Angelopoulou SL. Studio RAP 3D Prints Ceramic Tiles and Red Bricks for Amsterdam Boutique Facade. Designboom; 2022.
4. 4. Studio RAP Gietermans & Van Dijk. Ceramic House - Studio RAP. 2023. Available from: https://studiorap.nl/Ceramic-House [Last accessed: November6 2024].
5. 5.Mario Cucinella PJ. Architects and WASP Creates 3D-Printed Sustainable Housing Prototype. 2021. Available from: https://www.dezeen.com/2021/04/23/mario-cucinella-architects-wasp-3d-printed-housing/ [Last accessed: November6 2024].
6. 10.52842/conf.acadia.2019.57610.52842/conf.acadia.2019.576 ↗
7. 7.Nan C. The Computational Clay Column: Computational Ceramic Systems with Additive Manufacturing. In: Proceedings of the 42nd Conference on Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe. eCAADe: Nicosia Cyprus; 2024.10.52842/conf.ecaade.2024.1.055 ↗
8. 8.Chan SSL, , Pennings RM, , Edwards L, et al. 3D printing of clay for decorative architectural applications: Effect of solids volume fraction on rheology and printability. Addit Manuf 2020;35:101335; doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101335
9. 9.Peng H Wu R Marschner S et al. On-The-Fly Print: Incremental Printing While Modelling. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM: San Jose CA; 2016; pp. 887–896; doi: 10.1145/2858036.285810610.1145/2858036.2858106 ↗
10. 10.Willis KDD Xu C Wu K-J et al. Interactive Fabrication: New Interfaces for Digital Fabrication. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Tangible Embedded and Embodied Interaction. ACM: Funchal Portugal; 2010; pp. 69–72; doi: 10.1145/1935701.193571610.1145/1935701.1935716 ↗
11. 10.3390/ma1406151110.3390/ma14061511 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.addma.2021.10225110.1016/j.addma.2021.102251 ↗
13. 10.52842/conf.ecaade.2018.2.02110.52842/conf.ecaade.2018.2.021 ↗
14. 14.Keep J. Self Build Delta 3D Printer. n.d. Available from: https://www.keep-art.co.uk/Self_build.html [Last accessed: November17 2024].
15. 15. Unfold Design Studio. Ceramic 3d Printing. n.d. Available from: http://unfold.be/pages/ceramic-3d-printing [Last accessed: November17 2024].
16. 10.52842/conf.acadia.2018.35010.52842/conf.acadia.2018.350 ↗
17. 10.52842/conf.ecaade.2018.2.07110.52842/conf.ecaade.2018.2.071 ↗
18. 18.Lange C Holohan D. CERAMICINFORMATION PAVILION Rethinking Structural Brick Specials through an Indexical 3D Printing Method. In: Proceedings of the 24th CAADRIA Conference. CAADRIA: Wellington New Zealand; 2019; pp. 103–112; doi: 10.52842/conf.caadria.2019.1.10310.52842/conf.caadria.2019.1.103 ↗
19. 19.Rosenwasser D, , Mantell S, , Sabin JE. Clay Non-Wovens: Robotic Fabrication and Digital Ceramics. ACADIA: Cambridge, MA; 2017; pp. 502–511; doi: 10.52842/conf.acadia.2017.502
20. 10.1016/j.autcon.2019.10300510.1016/j.autcon.2019.103005 ↗
21. 10.3390/biomimetics604005910.3390/biomimetics6040059 ↗
22. 10.3390/biomimetics704015910.3390/biomimetics7040159 ↗
23. 23.Tokac I Gursoy B Bruyninckx H et al. Craft-Inspired Digital Fabrication: A Study of Interactive Robotic Clay Carving. In: Proceedings of the 7th Annual ACM Symposium on Computational Fabrication. ACM: Seattle WA USA; 2022; pp. 1–14; doi: 10.1145/3559400.356200310.1145/3559400.3562003 ↗
24. 10.1007/978-3-031-37189-9_2710.1007/978-3-031-37189-9_27 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.autcon.2020.10346710.1016/j.autcon.2020.103467 ↗
26. 10.2307/j.ctt1tp3c5w.3010.2307/j.ctt1tp3c5w.30 ↗
27. 10.1007/s41693-022-00081-410.1007/s41693-022-00081-4 ↗
28. 28.Teng T. Doubleteng/PulseControl. 2024.
29. 29. Mahshid. Mahshid-Moghadasi/DynPath. 2024.
30. 30.Birol EB. Polybrick 2.0 Via Robotic Fabrication: Design And Analysis Of Bio-Integrative Load Bearing Lattice Structures For Clay Additive Manufacturing. Dissertation or Thesis. Cornell University: Ithaca NY; 2021.
31. 10.1201/9781003023555-1110.1201/9781003023555-11 ↗
32. 32.Moghadasi M. DIGITAL IMPROMPTU: Real-Time Design and Making through Human-Robot Interaction. Dissertation or Thesis. Cornell University: Ithaca NY; 2021.
33. 33.Teng T. Interactive Fabrication & Design of Bioinspired Surface Geometry. Dissertation or thesis. Cornell University: Ithaca NY; 2021.
34. 34.Moghadasi M. CLAY DJ. n.d. Available from: https://www.mahshidmoghadasi.com/digitalclay [Last accessed: November7 2024].