Mudskipper-inspired amphibious robotic fish enhances locomotion performance by pectoral-caudal fins coordination
Source abstract
Abstract
Amphibious robots face challenges in efficiently combining locomotion strategies and coordinating propulsive mechanisms, hindering their locomotion performance similar to amphibian animals. This study presents the design and implementation of an agile amphibious robot inspired by the mudskipper, a highly adaptive amphibian. This innovative robot employs fish-like locomotion underwater and legged locomotion on land to achieve high propulsion efficiency. Furthermore, the maneuverability of the robot is significantly enhanced through the coordination of the pectoral and caudal fins. Our experimental results demonstrate that the minimum cost of transport for terrestrial and aquatic locomotion is 4.56 and 2.02, respectively, outperforming many existing amphibious and unimodal robots. In addition, the robot’s terrestrial and aquatic turning speeds improved by 50.1% and 24.4%, respectively, owing to the effective coordination of the pectoral and caudal fins. Our amphibious robot has great potential for diverse applications and provides valuable insights for the development of advanced and versatile robotic systems.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Underwater Vehicles and Communication Systems · Robotic Locomotion and Control · Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Shape changing robots: bioinspiration, simulation, and physical realization
2. Real-world embodied AI through a morphologically adaptive quadruped robot10.1038/s42256-021-00320-3 ↗
3. Baines · 2019 · 704
4. Research status of bionic amphibious robots: A review10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.108862 ↗
5. Locomotion Strategies for Amphibious Robots-A Review10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3057406 ↗
6. Mudskipper pectoral fin kinematics in aquatic and terrestrial environments10.1242/jeb.029041 ↗
7. Harris · 1960 · 1 · 107
8. Wang · 2013 · 1095
9. Kinematics of aquatic and terrestrial escape responses in mudskippers10.1242/jeb.01237 ↗
10. Three-dimensional limb joint mobility in the early tetrapod Ichthyostega10.1038/nature11124 ↗
11. Propulsive forces of mudskipper fins and salamander limbs during terrestrial locomotion: implications for the invasion of land10.1093/icb/ict051 ↗
12. Tail use improves performance on soft substrates in models of early vertebrate land locomotors10.1126/science.aaf0984 ↗
13. Development of amphibious biomimetic robots10.1631/jzus.A2100137 ↗
14. Greiner · 1996 · 41
15. Ayers · 2000
16. Development of arm and leg for seabed walking robot CRABSTER20010.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.02.028 ↗
17. Faudzi · 2017 · 981
18. Graf · 2019 · 158
19. Design, fabrication, and characterization of an untethered amphibious sea urchin-inspired robot10.1109/LRA.2019.2926683 ↗
20. Four flippers or two? Tetrapodal swimming with an aquatic robot10.1088/1748-3182/1/1/003 ↗
21. Mechanism design and gait experiment of an amphibian robotic turtle10.1163/016918611X590300 ↗
22. Gait study and pattern generation of a starfish-like soft robot with flexible rays actuated by SMAs10.1016/S1672-6529(14)60053-6 ↗
23. Development of a biomimetic underwater microrobot for a father–son robot system10.1007/s00542-016-2817-3 ↗
24. Subsea crab bounding gait of leg-paddle hybrid driven shoal crablike robot10.1016/j.mechatronics.2017.10.002 ↗
25. S. development of amphibious snake-like robot acm-r5
26. Liljebäck · 2014 · 294
27. Development of an amphibious snake-like robot and its gaits on ground and in water
28. Milana · 2020 · 766
29. From swimming to walking with a salamander robot driven by a spinal cord model10.1126/science.1138353 ↗
30. Yin · 2012 · 956
31. From cineradiography to biorobots: an approach for designing robots to emulate and study animal locomotion10.1098/rsif.2015.1089 ↗
32. Aquatic versus terrestrial attachment: water makes a difference10.3762/bjnano.5.252 ↗
33. How muscles accommodate movement in different physical environments: aquatic vs. terrestrial locomotion in vertebrates10.1016/S1095-6433(01)00466-4 ↗
34. Advantages of natural propulsive systems10.4031/MTSJ.47.5.2 ↗
35. The energetic cost of moving about: walking and running are extremely inefficient forms of locomotion. Much greater efficiency is achieved by birds, fish—and bicyclists
36. BCF swimming locomotion for autonomous underwater robots: a review and a novel solution to improve control and efficiency10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.11.055 ↗
37. A literature review on the optimization of legged robots10.1177/1077546311403180 ↗
38. Yang · 2007 · 769
39. Li · 2012 · 2282
40. Yi · 2015 · 559
41. Wang · 2009 · 140
42. On a CPG-based hexapod robot: AmphiHex-II with variable stiffness legs10.1109/TMECH.2018.2800776 ↗
43. Xing · 2019 · 1702
44. Dey · 2013 · 5622
45. Aqua: An amphibious autonomous robot10.1109/MC.2007.6 ↗
46. Boxerbaum · 2005 · 1459
47. Multi-environment robotic transitions through adaptive morphogenesis10.1038/s41586-022-05188-w ↗
48. Learning to move on land10.1126/science.aag1092 ↗
49. Sustained periodic terrestrial locomotion in air-breathing fishes10.1111/jfb.12318 ↗
50. Randomness in appendage coordination facilitates strenuous ground self-righting10.1088/1748-3190/abac47 ↗
51. Metachronal coordination of multiple appendages for swimming and pumping10.1093/icb/icab181 ↗
52. Motion control and motion coordination of bionic robotic fish: A review10.1007/s42235-018-0048-2 ↗
53. Robot fish with two-DOF pectoral fins and a wire-driven caudal fin10.1080/01691864.2017.1392344 ↗
54. Sun · 2011 · 5035
55. A versatile locomotion mechanism for amphibious robots: eccentric paddle mechanism10.1002/jcph.78 ↗
56. Locomotion performance of the amphibious robot on various terrains and underwater with flexible flipper legs10.1016/S1672-6529(16)60325-6 ↗
57. Visual detection and tracking system for a spherical amphibious robot10.3390/s17040870 ↗
58. Study on the autonomous multirobot collaborative control system based on spherical amphibious robots10.1109/JSYST.2020.3023727 ↗
59. Kelasidi, E. (2015). Modeling, Control and Energy Efficiency of Underwater Snake Robots. PhD thesis. Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
60. Get a grip: inward dactyl motions improve efficiency of sideways-walking gait for an amphibious crab-like robot10.1088/1748-3190/ac8710 ↗
61. Dhull · 2012 · 100
62. Suh · 2020 · 7027
63. Research status of bionic amphibious robots: A review10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.108862 ↗
64. Four flippers or two? Tetrapodal swimming with an aquatic robot10.1088/1748-3182/1/1/003 ↗
65. A bipedal walking robot that can fly, slackline, and skateboard10.1126/scirobotics.abf8136 ↗
66. Efficient bipedal robots based on passive-dynamic walkers10.1126/science.1107799 ↗
67. Jellyfish-Inspired Soft Robot Driven by Fluid Electrode Dielectric Organic Robotic Actuators10.3389/frobt.2019.00126 ↗
68. Get a grip: inward dactyl motions improve efficiency of sideways-walking gait for an amphibious crab-like robot10.1088/1748-3190/ac8710 ↗
69. Controllable water surface to underwater transition through electrowetting in a hybrid terrestrial-aquatic microrobot10.1038/s41467-018-04855-9 ↗
70. Hutter · 2016 · 38
71. Fish-like three-dimensional swimming with an autonomous, multi-fin, and biomimetic robot10.1088/1748-3190/abd013 ↗
72. Bledt · 2018 · 2245
73. An Analysis of Peristaltic Locomotion for Maximizing Velocity or Minimizing Cost of Transport of Earthworm-Like Robots10.1089/soro.2020.0021 ↗
74. Kau · 2019 · 6309
75. TITAN-XIII: sprawling-type quadruped robot with ability of fast and energy-efficient walking10.1186/s40648-016-0047-1 ↗
76. Amphibious Pattern Design of a Robotic Fish with Wheel-propeller-fin Mechanisms10.1002/rob.21470 ↗
77. Rhex: A biologically inspired hexapod runner10.1023/A:1012426720699 ↗
78. Tunabot Flex: a tuna-inspired robot with body flexibility improves high-performance swimming10.1088/1748-3190/abb86d ↗
79. Minimum cost of transport in Asian elephants: do we really need a bigger elephant?10.1242/jeb.063032 ↗
80. Energetics of locomotion by the Australian water rat (Hydromys chrysogaster): a comparison of swimming and running in a semi-aquatic mammal10.1242/jeb.202.4.353 ↗
81. Yang · 2022 · 773
82. How people initiate energy optimization and converge on their optimal gaits
83. Environmental studies on the mudskippers in the intertidal zone of Kuwait Bay
84. How dorsal fin sharpness affects swimming speed and economy10.1017/jfm.2019.612 ↗
85. Effects of fish caudal fin sweep angle and kinematics on thrust production during low-speed thunniform swimming10.1242/bio.040626 ↗
86. How swimming style and schooling affect the hydrodynamics of two accelerating wavy hydrofoils10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.113314 ↗
87. Spontaneous response of a self-organized fish school to a predator10.1088/1748-3190/abfd7f ↗
88. Fish can save energy via proprioceptive sensing10.1088/1748-3190/ac165e ↗
89. Energy harvesting from passive oscillation of inverted foil10.1063/5.0056567 ↗
90. Flow map of foil undergoing combined fast and slow pitching10.1063/5.0063992 ↗
91. Hydrodynamic performance of slender swimmer: effect of travelling wavelength10.1017/jfm.2022.624 ↗
92. A Fully 3D-Printed Tortoise-Inspired Soft Robot with Terrains-Adaptive and Amphibious Landing Capabilities10.1002/admt.202200536 ↗
93. Bioinspired hydrogel jellyfish with mechanical flexibility and acoustic transparency10.1016/j.xcrp.2022.101081 ↗
94. Magnetic soft materials and robots10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00481 ↗
95. Hydraulic hydrogel actuators and robots optically and sonically camouflaged in water10.1038/ncomms14230 ↗
96. Ferromagnetic soft continuum robots10.1126/scirobotics.aax7329 ↗
97. Finger-inspired rigid-soft hybrid tactile sensor with superior sensitivity at high frequency10.1038/s41467-022-32827-7 ↗
98. Facile fabrication of a fast-response flexible temperature sensor via laser reduced graphene oxide for contactless human-machine interface10.1016/j.carbon.2021.10.064 ↗
99. Symmetry breaking of tail-clamped filaments in Stokes flow10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.124501 ↗
100. Jaafar · 2017