Predicting cell failure and performance decline in lithium-sulfur batteries using distribution of relaxation times analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
While lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries are a promising next-generation technology, their complex chemistry means they can degrade and fail via numerous mechanisms. To minimize or overcome these modes of failure, we must develop tools that can differentiate between chemical processes in the operating cell, reveal their effects on cell health, and monitor cells throughout their lifetimes. In this study we undertake a comprehensive investigation of the failure modes exhibited by Li-S cells, using the distribution of relaxation times (DRT) method. By evaluating the contribution of various electrochemical processes to overall cell resistance, we establish meaningful correlations between performance degradation and specific electrochemical/materials phenomena. Notably, the DRT profiles reveal that the solid-electrolyte interphase resistance can serve as an early indicator of impending cell failure. The methodologies and findings presented in this study hold substantial implications for the advancement of on-board diagnostics tailored for Li-S batteries and other cell chemistries.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advancements in Battery Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. 2021 roadmap on lithium sulfur batteries
2. “Shuttle” in polysulfide shuttle: friend or foe?10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06077 ↗
3. Concurrent real-time estimation of state of health and maximum available power in lithium-sulfur batteries10.3390/en11082133 ↗
4. Online state-of-health estimation of VRLA batteries using state of charge10.1109/TIE.2012.2186771 ↗
5. State-of-charge determination from EMF voltage estimation: using impedance, terminal voltage, and current for lead-acid and lithium-ion batteries10.1109/TIE.2007.899926 ↗
6. Synthetic methods for the evaluation of the State of Health (SOH) of nickel-metal hydride (NiMH) batteries10.1016/j.enconman.2014.12.040 ↗
7. Improved state of charge estimation for lithium-sulfur batteries10.1016/j.est.2019.100943 ↗
8. Lithium-sulfur battery diagnostics through distribution of relaxation times analysis10.1016/j.ensm.2022.06.016 ↗
9. Charging processes in lithium-oxygen batteries unraveled through the lens of the distribution of relaxation times10.1016/j.chempr.2023.04.022 ↗
10. A new insight on capacity fading of lithium-sulfur batteries: The effect of Li2S phase structure10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.05.072 ↗
11. Capacity fade analysis of sulfur cathodes in lithium– sulfur batteries10.1002/advs.201600101 ↗
12. Correlation of capacity fading processes and electrochemical impedance spectra in lithium/sulfur cells10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.05.032 ↗
13. Irreversible vs reversible capacity fade of lithium-sulfur batteries during cycling: The effects of precipitation and shuttle10.1149/2.0171801jes ↗
14. Second life batteries lifespan: rest of useful life and environmental analysis
15. Generalized distribution of relaxation times analysis for the characterization of impedance spectra10.3390/batteries5030053 ↗
16. How to obtain reproducible results for lithium sulfur batteries?10.1149/2.106311jes ↗
17. Improved cyclability of liquid electrolyte lithium/sulfur batteries by optimizing electrolyte/sulfur ratio10.3390/en5125190 ↗
18. A graphene–pure-sulfur sandwich structure for ultrafast, long-life lithium–sulfur batteries10.1002/adma.201302877 ↗
19. Host materials anchoring polysulfides in Li–S batteries reviewed10.1002/aenm.202001304 ↗
20. Challenges and key parameters of lithium-sulfur batteries on pouch cell level10.1016/j.joule.2020.02.006 ↗
21. Solidifying cathode–electrolyte interface for lithium–sulfur batteries10.1002/aenm.202000791 ↗
22. The effects of lithium sulfur battery ageing on second-life possibilities and environmental life cycle assessment studies10.3390/en12122440 ↗
23. A review of conduction phenomena in Li-ion batteries10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.06.060 ↗
24. Modelling transport-limited discharge capacity of lithium-sulfur cells10.1016/j.electacta.2016.10.032 ↗
25. Activating Li2S as the lithium-containing cathode in lithium–sulfur batteries10.1021/acsenergylett.0c00936 ↗
26. Mechanism and kinetics of Li2S precipitation in lithium–sulfur batteries10.1002/adma.201501559 ↗
27. The role of polysulfide-saturation in electrolytes for high power applications of real world Li−S pouch cells10.1007/s12274-022-5017-8 ↗
28. Pathways for practical high-energy long-cycling lithium metal batteries10.1038/s41560-019-0338-x ↗
29. Generation and evolution of the solid electrolyte interphase of lithium-Ion batteries10.1016/j.joule.2019.08.018 ↗
30. “Soft Shorts” hidden in zinc metal anode research10.1016/j.joule.2021.12.009 ↗
31. Li-ion battery separators, mechanical integrity and failure mechanisms leading to soft and hard internal shorts10.1038/srep32578 ↗
32. Sulfur polymerization strategy based on the intrinsic properties of polymers for advanced binder-free and high-sulfur-content Li–S batteries10.1002/sus2.110 ↗
33. Recent strategies for improving the performances of rechargeable lithium batteries with sulfur- and oxygen-based conversion cathodes