journal article·2020-11Open access

Adaptive Optimization of Chemical Reactions with Minimal Experimental Information

Daniel Reker, Emily A. Hoyt, Gonçalo J.L. Bernardes, Tiago Rodrigues

Cell Reports Physical Science· Volume 1· Issue 11

Abstract

Optimizing reaction conditions depends on expert chemistry knowledge and laborious exploration of reaction parameters. To automate this task and augment chemical intuition, we here report a computational tool to navigate search spaces. Our approach (LabMate.ML) integrates random sampling of 0.03%–0.04% of all search space as input data with an interpretable, adaptive machine-learning algorithm. LabMate.ML can optimize many real-valued and categorical reaction parameters simultaneously, with minimal computational resources and time. In nine prospective proof-of-concept studies pursuing distinctive objectives, we demonstrate how LabMate.ML can identify optimal goal-oriented conditions for several different chemistries and substrates. Double-blind competitions and the conducted expert surveys reveal that its performance is competitive with that of human experts. LabMate.ML does not require specialized hardware, affords quantitative and interpretable reactivity insights, and autonomously formalizes chemical intuition, thereby providing an innovative framework for informed, automated experiment selection toward the democratization of synthetic chemistry.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Computational Drug Discovery Methods · Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. Organic chemistry in drug discovery10.1126/science.1096800 ↗
2. Reinventing chemistry10.1002/anie.201410884 ↗
3. Natural product total synthesis: as exciting as ever and here to stay10.1021/jacs.8b02266 ↗
4. Anthropogenic biases in chemical reaction data hinder exploratory inorganic synthesis10.1038/s41586-019-1540-5 ↗
5. Inside the mind of a medicinal chemist: the role of human bias in compound prioritization during drug discovery10.1371/journal.pone.0048476 ↗
6. 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility10.1038/533452a ↗
7. Bioprocess optimization using design-of-experiments methodology10.1002/btpr.67 ↗
8. Feedback in Flow for Accelerated Reaction Development10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00261 ↗
9. Autonomous discovery in the chemical sciences part II: Outlook
10. Autonomous discovery in the chemical sciences part I: Progress
11. Machine learning: trends, perspectives, and prospects10.1126/science.aaa8415 ↗
12. The rise of deep learning in drug discovery10.1016/j.drudis.2018.01.039 ↗
13. Automating drug discovery10.1038/nrd.2017.232 ↗
14. Toward generalization of iterative small molecule synthesis10.1038/s41570-018-0115 ↗
15. The molecular industrial revolution: automated synthesis of small molecules10.1002/anie.201710482 ↗
16. Synthesis of many different types of organic small molecules using one automated process10.1126/science.aaa5414 ↗
17. ChemOS: orchestrating autonomous experimentation10.1126/scirobotics.aat5559 ↗
18. Designing algorithms to aid discovery by chemical robots10.1021/acscentsci.8b00176 ↗
19. Streamlining bioactive molecular discovery through integration and automation10.1038/s41570-018-0025-7 ↗
20. Automatic chemical design using a data-driven continuous representation of molecules10.1021/acscentsci.7b00572 ↗
21. Optimizing chemical reactions with deep reinforcement learning10.1021/acscentsci.7b00492 ↗
22. Planning chemical syntheses with deep neural networks and symbolic AI10.1038/nature25978 ↗
23. The engineering of chemical synthesis: humans and machines working in harmony10.1002/anie.201802383 ↗
24. Optimum catalyst selection over continuous and discrete process variables with a single droplet microfluidic reaction platform10.1039/C8RE00032H ↗
25. Machine-learning-assisted materials discovery using failed experiments10.1038/nature17439 ↗
26. Predicting reaction performance in C-N cross-coupling using machine learning10.1126/science.aar5169 ↗
27. Deoxyfluorination with sulfonyl fluorides: navigating reaction space with machine learning10.1021/jacs.8b01523 ↗
28. Controlling an organic synthesis robot with machine learning to search for new reactivity10.1038/s41586-018-0307-8 ↗
29. Reconfigurable system for automated optimization of diverse chemical reactions10.1126/science.aat0650 ↗
30. Multi-objective active machine learning rapidly improves structure-activity models and reveals new protein-protein interaction inhibitors10.1039/C5SC04272K ↗
31. On-the-fly machine learning of atomic potential in density functional theory structure optimization10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.026102 ↗
32. Introduction
33. Combining on-chip synthesis of a focused combinatorial library with computational target prediction reveals imidazopyridine GPCR ligands10.1002/anie.201307786 ↗
34. Studies on the coupling of substituted 2-amino-1,3-oxazoles with chloro-heterocycles10.1016/j.tetlet.2012.04.015 ↗
35. Organic synthesis provides opportunities to transform drug discovery10.1038/s41557-018-0021-z ↗
36. New insights into xantphos/Pd-catalyzed C-N bond forming reactions: a structural and kinetic study10.1021/om050715g ↗
37. Room-temperature C-H arylation: merger of Pd-catalyzed C-H functionalization and visible-light photocatalysis10.1021/ja208068w ↗
38. Rapid phenolic O-glycosylation of small molecules and complex unprotected peptides in aqueous solvent10.1038/s41557-018-0041-8 ↗
39. Chemoselective Installation of Amine Bonds on Proteins through Aza-Michael Ligation10.1021/jacs.7b10702 ↗
40. Reductive Amination of Aldehydes and Ketones with Sodium Triacetoxyborohydride. Studies on Direct and Indirect Reductive Amination Procedures(1)10.1021/jo960057x ↗
41. trans-Cyclooctenes as Halolactonization Catalysts10.1002/anie.201808320 ↗
42. Rapid Imaging of Tumor Cell Death In Vivo Using the C2A Domain of Synaptotagmin-I10.2967/jnumed.116.183004 ↗
43. Phoenics: a Bayesian optimizer for chemistry10.1021/acscentsci.8b00307 ↗
44. How many variables can humans process?10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00782.x ↗
45. SNOBFIT–Stable Noisy Optimization by Branch and Fit10.1145/1377612.1377613 ↗
46. Active-learning strategies in computer-assisted drug discovery10.1016/j.drudis.2014.12.004 ↗
47. An autonomous organic reaction search engine for chemical reactivity10.1038/ncomms15733 ↗
48. Human versus robots in the discovery and crystallization of gigantic polyoxometalates10.1002/anie.201705721 ↗
49. Using evolutionary algorithms and machine learning to explore sequence space for the discovery of antimicrobial peptides10.1016/j.chempr.2018.01.005 ↗
50. Chimera: enabling hierarchy based multi-objective optimization for self-driving laboratories10.1039/C8SC02239A ↗
51. Active learning for computational chemogenomics10.4155/fmc-2016-0197 ↗
52. Active learning with support vector machines in the drug discovery process10.1021/ci025620t ↗
53. Predicting potent compounds via model-based global optimization10.1021/ci3004682 ↗