journal article·2021-01Open access

Optimization of Formulations Using Robotic Experiments Driven by Machine Learning DoE

Liwei Cao, Danilo Russo, Kobi Felton, Daniel Salley, Abhishek Sharma, Graham Keenan, Werner Mauer, Huanhuan Gao, Leroy Cronin, Alexei A. Lapkin

Cell Reports Physical Science· Volume 2· Issue 1

Abstract

Formulated products are complex mixtures of ingredients whose time to market can be difficult to speed due to the lack of general predictable physical models for the desired properties. Here, we report the coupling of a machine learning classification algorithm with the Thompson sampling efficient multiobjective optimization (TSEMO) algorithm for the simultaneous optimization of continuous and discrete outputs. The methodology is successfully applied to the design of a formulated liquid product of commercial interest for which no physical models are available. Experiments are carried out in a semiautomated fashion using robotic platforms triggered by the machine learning algorithms. The procedure allows one to find nine suitable recipes meeting the customer-defined criteria within 15 working days, outperforming human intuition in the target performance of the formulations.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation · Advanced Control Systems Optimization · Machine Learning and Algorithms

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (60)

Show source-provided references
1. Chemical product engineering: an emerging paradigm within chemical engineering10.1002/aic.10880 ↗
2. Development of surfactants and builders in detergent formulations10.1016/S1004-9541(08)60115-9 ↗
3. A comprehensive review on emulsions and emulsion stability in chemical and energy industries10.1002/cjce.23336 ↗
4. Design of formulated products: a systematic methodology10.1002/aic.12458 ↗
5. An overview of novel surfactants for formulation of cosmetics with certain emphasis on acidic active substances10.3139/113.110405 ↗
6. Sakamoto · 2017
7. Product and formulation engineering of emulsions10.1205/cerd.82.9.1137.44154 ↗
8. Product design and engineering—past, present, future trends in teaching, research and practices: academic and industry points of view10.1016/j.coche.2019.10.003 ↗
9. Product design: molecules, devices, functional products, and formulated products10.1016/j.compchemeng.2015.04.013 ↗
10. A comprehensive framework for surfactant selection and design for emulsion based chemical product design10.1016/j.fluid.2013.10.030 ↗
11. A systematic methodology for design of emulsion based chemical products10.1016/B978-0-444-59507-2.50036-6 ↗
12. Computer aided product design: Problem formulations, methodology and applications10.1016/0098-1354(95)00202-2 ↗
13. Ng · 2007
14. Cusller · 2011
15. Viscosity models for multiple emulsions10.1016/j.foodhyd.2006.12.012 ↗
16. Rheology of emulsions10.1016/j.cis.2009.07.001 ↗
17. Design of experiments (DoE) and process optimization. A review of recent publications10.1021/op500169m ↗
18. Use of factorial design for evaluation of factors affecting the chemical stability of sirolimus (rapamycin) in solid dosage form
19. A quality by experimental design approach to assess the effect of formulation and process variables on the extrusion and spheronization of drug-loaded pellets containing Polyplasdone® XL-1010.1208/s12249-015-0345-6 ↗
20. Fahmy · AAPS PharmSciTech · 2012 · 13 · 124310.1208/s12249-012-9844-x ↗
21. Quality by design approach for understanding the critical quality attributes of cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion10.1021/mp400484g ↗
22. Quality by Design (QbD) approach to optimize the formulation of a bilayer combination tablet (Telmiduo®) manufactured via high shear wet granulation10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.10.004 ↗
23. Algorithms for the self-optimisation of chemical reactions10.1039/C9RE00209J ↗
24. Nanostructured lipid carriers of pioglitazone for transdermal application: from experimental design to bioactivity detail10.3109/10717544.2014.923958 ↗
25. Quality by design in pharmaceutical manufacturing: A systematic review of current status, challenges and future perspectives10.1016/j.ejpb.2019.12.007 ↗
26. Eriksson · 2008
27. Bayesian optimization for materials design with mixed quantitative and qualitative variables10.1038/s41598-020-60652-9 ↗
28. A novel internet-based reaction monitoring, control and autonomous self-optimization platform for chemical synthesis10.1021/acs.oprd.5b00313 ↗
29. The weighted sum method for multi-objective optimization: New insights10.1007/s00158-009-0460-7 ↗
30. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II10.1109/4235.996017 ↗
31. Combining Gaussian processes, mutual information and a genetic algorithm for multi-target optimization of expensive-to-evaluate functions10.1080/0305215X.2014.881997 ↗
32. Closed-loop multitarget optimization for discovery of new emulsion polymerization recipes10.1021/acs.oprd.5b00210 ↗
33. ParEGO: A hybrid algorithm with on-line landscape approximation for expensive multiobjective optimization problems10.1109/TEVC.2005.851274 ↗
34. A multicriteria generalization of Bayesian global optimization
35. Efficient multiobjective optimization employing Gaussian processes, spectral sampling and a genetic algorithm10.1007/s10898-018-0609-2 ↗
36. A new PSO-based algorithm for multi-objective optimization with continuous and discrete design variables10.1007/s00158-017-1764-7 ↗
37. Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling optimization enabled by automated feedback10.1039/C6RE00153J ↗
38. Photoredox iridium-nickel dual-catalyzed decarboxylative arylation cross-coupling: from batch to continuous flow via self-optimizing segmented flow reactor10.1021/acs.oprd.8b00018 ↗
39. Machine learning and molecular descriptors enable rational solvent selection in asymmetric catalysis10.1039/C9SC01844A ↗
40. The promise of artificial intelligence in chemical engineering: Is it here, finally?10.1002/aic.16489 ↗
41. Deep learning-based surrogate modeling and optimization for microalgal biofuel production and photobioreactor design10.1002/aic.16473 ↗
42. Controlling an organic synthesis robot with machine learning to search for new reactivity10.1038/s41586-018-0307-8 ↗
43. Organic synthesis in a modular robotic system driven by a chemical programming language10.1126/science.aav2211 ↗
44. Space-filling Latin hypercube designs based on randomization restrictions in factorial experiments10.1016/j.spl.2014.07.032 ↗
45. Choosing the sample size of a computer experiment: A practical guide10.1198/TECH.2009.08040 ↗
46. Estimation of prediction error by using K-fold cross-validation10.1007/s11222-009-9153-8 ↗
47. Mathematical theory of the symmetrical factorial design on JSTOR
48. Formulation optimization of controlled release diclofenac sodium microspheres using factorial design10.1016/S0168-3659(97)00102-8 ↗
49. Machine learning meets continuous flow chemistry: automated optimization towards the Pareto front of multiple objectives10.1016/j.cej.2018.07.031 ↗
50. A new formulation for symbolic regression to identify physico-chemical laws from experimental data10.1016/j.cej.2019.123412 ↗
51. Distilling free-form natural laws from experimental data10.1126/science.1165893 ↗
52. AI Feynman: a physics-inspired method for symbolic regression10.1126/sciadv.aay2631 ↗
53. A modular programmable inorganic cluster discovery robot for the discovery and synthesis of polyoxometalates10.1021/acscentsci.0c00415 ↗
54. A sequential algorithm for training text classifiers
55. Active and semisupervised learning for the classification of remote sensing images10.1109/TGRS.2014.2305805 ↗
56. Chen · 2010
57. A novel active learning method using SVM for text classification10.1007/s11633-015-0912-z ↗
58. The optimality of naive Bayes
59. Maximum likelihood estimation of Dirichlet distributions10.1080/00949658908811178 ↗
60. A mathematical theory of communication10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x ↗