journal article·2026-12Open access

The interpretable machine learning strategy deepens the application of cemented tailings backfill material with tailings-cement-fly ash in engineering

Lei Hou, Shaoqi Kong, Sheng Wang, Kui Dong, Kunjie Li

Abstract

The massive accumulation of mine tailings (MT) poses a serious environmental challenge in mining areas, and their utilization in cemented tailings backfill (CTB) offers an effective solution for solid waste reuse and safe underground backfilling. However, traditional methods for evaluating the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of CTB composed of MT, ordinary Portland cement (OPC), and fly ash (FA) are time-consuming and limited in applicability, highlighting the need for an efficient and accurate predictive approach capable of capturing complex nonlinear interactions. In this study, a machine learning (ML) model was developed based on 702 multi-source samples, achieving excellent predictive performance on the testing set ( R 2 = 0.970) after systematic comparative selection and optimization. Feature importance analysis showed that curing time contributed the most to UCS prediction (32.181%), followed by OPC mass ratio (22.893%) and FA mass ratio (11.396%). SHapley Additive exPlanations analysis revealed a pronounced staged nonlinear effect of curing time and a clear threshold effect of water-to-binder ratio at approximately 18%. Validation on 24 independent samples confirmed the model’s engineering applicability ( R 2 = 0.880), and a user-friendly graphical user interface was developed to improve practicality. This study provides a robust ML framework for UCS prediction of complex cemented materials, offering strong technical support for scientific design and safety management of CTB systems in mining engineering.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Tailings Management and Properties · Materials Engineering and Processing · Concrete and Cement Materials Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. Recycling and reuse of mine tailings: A review of advancements and their implications10.3390/geosciences12090319 ↗
2. An extensive review on restoration technologies for mining tailings10.1007/s11356-018-3423-y ↗
3. Tailings storage facilities, failures and disaster risk10.1038/s43017-024-00576-4 ↗
4. Transitioning the mining industry to a greener economy: An Asian perspective of mineral demand10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105483 ↗
5. Global trends and perspectives in soil stabilization/solidification technologies: A three-decade bibliometric analysis focused on heavy metal remediation and sustainable applications
6. Strength development and microstructure evolution of cemented tailings backfill containing different binder types and contents10.3390/min8040167 ↗
7. Some control measures to optimally extract deep-seated deposits: An overview
8. Properties of low-calcium fly ash based geopolymer concrete incorporating OPC as partial replacement of fly ash10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.067 ↗
9. Revisiting factors contributing to the strength of cemented backfill support system: A review10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.07.007 ↗
10. Enhancing tensile strength and microstructural properties of solidified high-moisture dredged sediment through solid waste-based binder stabilization and basalt fiber reinforcement
11. Physical-chemical characteristics of an eco-friendly binder using ternary mixture of industrial wastes
12. Machine learning methods for predicting the durability of concrete materials: A review
13. A novel data-driven machine learning techniques to predict compressive strength of fly ash and recycled coarse aggregates based self-compacting concrete
14. Strength prediction of cemented paste backfill with different machine learning and SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) approaches10.1016/j.rineng.2025.108269 ↗
15. Intelligent cemented paste backfill-strength design framework: Interpretable machine learning and mix-proportion optimization
16. Heavy metal removal efficiency in tailings through washing: Prediction and optimization10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.147433 ↗
17. A new filter feature selection algorithm for classification task by ensembling pearson correlation coefficient and mutual information10.1016/j.engappai.2024.107865 ↗
18. A machine learning approach to predicting plant available phosphorus that accounts for soil heterogeneity and regional variability10.1007/s11368-023-03648-y ↗
19. Effects of feature selection and normalization on network intrusion detection10.1016/j.dsm.2024.08.001 ↗
20. Decision trees10.1002/wics.1278 ↗
21. Kramer · 2013 · 51
22. Support-vector networks10.1023/A:1022627411411 ↗
23. Random forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
24. Extremely randomized trees10.1007/s10994-006-6226-1 ↗
25. Prettenhofer · PyData 2014 · 2014
26. Xgboost: extreme gradient boosting
27. Lightgbm: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree
28. CatBoost: unbiased boosting with categorical features
29. Enhanced prediction of occurrence forms of heavy metals in tailings: A systematic comparison of machine learning methods and model integration10.1007/s12613-025-3136-4 ↗
30. Predicting and interpreting the effects of steel slag amendment on soil acidification across diverse agricultural conditions10.1016/j.jclepro.2026.148374 ↗
31. Use of interpretable machine learning approaches for quantificationally understanding the performance of steel fiber-reinforced recycled aggregate concrete: From the perspective of compressive strength and splitting tensile strength10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109170 ↗
32. ML-AMPSIT: Machine learning-based automated multi-method parameter sensitivity and importance analysis tool
33. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions
34. Systems-level integration of machine learning, SHAP explainability, PCA, and network topology reveals multitarget protective actions of tannic acid against doxorubicin toxicity in pentose phosphate pathway
35. Efficient stabilization of dredged sediment by combining nano-modification and low-carbon supersulfated cement10.1016/j.jrmge.2025.08.013 ↗
36. Exploring utilization of generative AI for research and education in data-driven materials science10.1080/27660400.2025.2535956 ↗
37. Influence of Solid Content, Cement/Tailings Ratio, and Curing Time on Rheology and Strength of Cemented Tailings Backfill10.3390/min10100922 ↗
38. Detecting Multicollinearity in Regression Analysis10.12691/ajams-8-2-1 ↗
39. Hybrid Machine Learning-Based CPU Performance Prediction for Heterogeneous Scheduling Using LASSO, SVR, and Metaheuristic Optimization10.31449/inf.v49i20.8062 ↗
40. On hyperparameter optimization of machine learning algorithms: Theory and practice10.1016/j.neucom.2020.07.061 ↗
41. Uncertainty quantification in machine learning for engineering design and health prognostics: A tutorial10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110796 ↗
42. Co-disposal of magnesium slag and high-calcium fly ash as cementitious materials in backfill10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123684 ↗
43. Comparative research on the effect of various mineral admixtures on the early hydration process of cement10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124372 ↗
44. Fly ash application as supplementary cementitious material: A review10.3390/ma15072664 ↗
45. Microstructure and pore water evolution in calcium silicate cement blends with Portland cement, calcium aluminate cement and calcium sulfoaluminate cement under CO2 curing10.1016/j.jobe.2026.115635 ↗
46. Early Hydration Characteristics and Kinetics Model of Ordinary Portland Cement-Calcium Sulfoaluminate Cement Composites
47. Pozzolanic properties of reject fly ash in blended cement pastes10.1016/S0008-8846(03)00213-8 ↗
48. Effect of water saturation on mechanical characteristics and damage behavior of cemented paste backfill10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.11.078 ↗
49. Effect of tailings fineness on the pore structure development of cemented paste backfill10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.09.052 ↗
50. Evaluation of viscosity, strength and microstructural properties of cemented tailings backfill10.3390/min8080352 ↗
51. Molecular mechanism of fly ash affecting the performance of cemented backfill material10.1007/s12613-023-2658-x ↗
52. A review of user interface design for interactive machine learning10.1145/3185517 ↗
53. Intelligent cemented paste backfill-strength design framework: Interpretable machine learning and mix-proportion optimization10.1016/j.gsme.2025.09.006 ↗
54. Strength prediction of cemented paste backfill with different machine learning and SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) approaches10.1016/j.rineng.2025.108269 ↗