journal article·2026-12Open access

Bending failure modes and moment capacity prediction of steel and FRP bars hybrid reinforced UHPC beams based on machine learning

Xiaojian Chen, Feng Zhang, Ashraf Ashour, Wenjie Ge, Yi Wang, Sheng Wang, Yu Zhu, Linfeng Qiu

Abstract

This study aims to develop and identify an optimal machine learning model for predicting the bending performance of UHPC beams reinforced with steel bars, FRP bars, and their hybrid reinforcement. Five different machine learning models were employed for training and prediction. Unlike previous studies focusing primarily on conventional reinforced UHPC beams, this study establishes a dedicated database for steel-FRP hybrid reinforced UHPC beams and performs a comparative evaluation of multiple machine learning algorithms for both classification and regression tasks. For training and evaluating these predictive model a dataset of 120 UHPC beams with steel bars, FRP bars, and hybrid reinforcement was collected, containing their failure modes and bending moment capacity. The models were evaluated using standard metrics for classification and regression tasks. The results indicate that the XGBoost model achieves the best overall performance in both failure mode classification and moment capacity prediction, demonstrating superior accuracy and generalization ability. Furthermore, based on the best-performing model in this study, the input feature values were analyzed using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. A graphical user interface (GUI) was designed to concurrently estimate failure modes and moment capacities for UHPC beams reinforced with steel, FRP, or hybrid systems. The results show that XGBoost achieves the best overall performance, demonstrating superior accuracy and generalization ability in both failure mode classification and moment capacity prediction. SHAP analysis indicates that section width, equivalent reinforcement ratio, effective depth, and FRP strength are the dominant factors influencing bending capacity. The developed predictive model and GUI provide a valuable reference for engineering researchers to more accurately predict the failure modes and load-carrying capacity of UHPC beams reinforced with steel bars, FRP bars, and hybrid reinforcement.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Concrete Corrosion and Durability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. Behaviors of hybrid beams composed of seawater sea-sand concrete (SWSSC) and a prefabricated UHPC shell reinforced with FRP bars10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.059 ↗
2. Evaluation of impact response of thermal-damaged FRP-RC slabs: effects of FRP bar type and concrete cover thickness
3. Maximum axial load carrying capacity of Fibre Reinforced-Polymer (FRP) bar reinforced concrete columns under axial compression10.1016/j.istruc.2018.12.012 ↗
4. Applications and development of fiber-reinforced polymer in engineering structures
5. Theoretical stress–strain model for circular concrete columns confined by GFRP spirals and hoops10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.08.020 ↗
6. bending Capacity of Prestressed Concrete Beams Reinforced with Aramid Fiber Reinforced Polymer (AFRP) rectangular tendons10.1016/S0950-0618(98)00016-6 ↗
7. Experimental study on bending behaviors of FRP and steel bars hybrid reinforced concrete beams
8. bending capacity of prestressed concrete beams reinforced with aramid fiber reinforced polymer (AFRP) rectangular tendons10.1016/S0950-0618(98)00016-6 ↗
9. DafuCao. Flexural performance of FRP/steel hybrid reinforced engineered cementitious composite beams
10. Flexural behavior of ECC-concrete hybrid composite beams reinforced with FRP and steel bars10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000910 ↗
11. Flexural behaviors of hybrid concrete beams reinforced with BFRP bars and steel bars10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.113 ↗
12. bending behavior of UHPC beam reinforced with steel-FRP composite bars
13. A bending design methodology for UHPC beams posttensioned with unbonded tendons
14. Graybeal · 2005
15. Predictive models for concrete properties using machine learning and deep learning approaches: a review
16. Machine learning framework for predicting failure mode and shear capacity of ultra high performance concrete beams10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111221 ↗
17. Machine vision method for crack detection and pattern recognition in uhpc prestressed beams
18. Machine learning-based prediction of torsional behavior for ultral-high-performance concrete beams with variable cross-section shapes
19. Natural language processing-based deep transfer learning model across diverse tabular datasets for bond strength prediction of composite bars in concrete10.1111/mice.13357 ↗
20. Predicting fatigue slip and fatigue life of FRP rebar-concrete bonds using tree-based and theory-informed learning models10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2025.108816 ↗
21. A data-physics fusion framework integrating XGBoost and PINN in data-limited conditions for prediction of FRP-UHPC beam test bond strength
22. Computational AI prediction models for residual tensile strength of GFRP bars aged in the alkaline concrete environment10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109134 ↗
23. Deng · 2023
24. bending behavior of GFRP and steel bars reinforced lightweight ultra-high performance fiber-reinforced concrete beams with various reinforcement ratios
25. Fu · 2016
26. Lu · 2010
27. Experimental and numerical study of bending response of Ultra High Performance Concrete (UHPC) beams reinforced with GFRP10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117017 ↗
28. Predicting service deflection of ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete beams reinforced with GFRP bars10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.013 ↗
29. Calculation method of bending capacity of ultra-high performance concrete beams reinforced with FRP rebars
30. Finite element analysis of bending behavior of ultra-high performance concrete beams reinforced with FRP bars and steel bars
31. Ying · 2022
32. Yuan · 2020
33. Zhong · 2023
34. Flexural behavior of GFRP reinforced high strength and ultra high strength concrete beams10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.11.094 ↗
35. Flexural behavior of ECC-concrete hybrid composite beams reinforced with FRP and steel bars10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000910 ↗
36. Machine learning predictions for bending capacity of ECC-concrete composite beams hybrid reinforced with steel and FRP bars
37. Machine learning ensembles for wind power prediction10.1016/j.renene.2015.11.073 ↗
38. Prediction of compressive strength of rice husk ash concrete: a comparison of different metaheuristic algorithms for optimizing support vector regression
39. Air quality index and air pollutant concentration prediction based on machine learning algorithms10.3390/app9194069 ↗
40. Support vector machines10.1109/5254.708428 ↗
41. Tianqi Chen, C. Guestrin. XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system, in: Proc. ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf[J]. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2016.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
42. An effective adaptive customization framework for small manufacturing plants using extreme gradient boosting-XGBoost and random forest ensemble learning algorithms in an Industry 4.0 environment
43. A decision-theoretic generalization of online learning and an application to boosting10.1006/jcss.1997.1504 ↗
44. Artificial neural networks: a tutorial10.1109/2.485891 ↗
45. Evaluation of the splitting tensile strength in plain and steel fiber-reinforced concrete based on the compressive strength10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.124 ↗
46. Rumelhart David · Learn. Represent. back-propagating Errors. · 1986 · 323 · 533
47. A comparative assessment of support vector regression, artificial neural networks, and random forests for predicting and mapping soil organic carbon stocks across an Afromontane landscape10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.12.028 ↗
48. Classification and regression by random Forest
49. A survey of decision tree classifier methodology10.1109/21.97458 ↗
50. Fault diagnosis based on extremely randomized trees in wireless sensor networks, Reliab10.1016/j.ress.2020.107284 ↗
51. Comparative study on the performance of different machine learning techniques to predict the shear strength of RC deep beams: Model selection and industry implications10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120649 ↗
52. Hybrid intelligence models for compressive strength prediction of MPC composites and parametric analysis with SHAP algorithm, Mater
53. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions
54. A novel approach to explain the black-box nature of machine learning in compressive strength predictions of concrete using Shapley additive explanations (SHAP)
55. Development of BIM software with quantity take-off and visualization capabilities