journal article·2025-03-17

An Analytical Slicing of Polymeric Tubes via 3D-Printed Dual Cutter

Hae Woon Choi, Talal Alshammari, Jonghyun Kim

Publisher page

Abstract

Polymeric tubing has played a crucial role in various industries. Manufacturing industries have traditionally used cutting methods for quality control, failure analysis, or to gain deeper insight into the device’s internal structure. A cross-sectional analysis of the tubes is required to control the manufacturing process of tubes produced by an extrusion process. However, small-scale factories and academic laboratories have so far used conventional hand cutters. Here, this study introduces a simple and novel analytical capability by fabricating and producing a dual-blade cutter tailored to the characteristics of the tubes. The dual-blade cutter, utilizing computer-aided design and three-dimensional (3D) printing, ensures low-cost parts, easy handling, and precise cutting. Through experiments, the cutting capability is verified by commercial polymer tubes. The dual-blade cutter is durable, allowing for an even distribution of cutting force. When cutting the outer diameter of the tube from 4 mm to 6 mm, the parallel angle deviation of the cut surface was 6–11%, demonstrating the ability to suppress surface roughness and burrs that may occur on the cut surface. It clamps the flexible tube effectively, minimizing tube deformation during cutting and increasing stability. As a result, the deformation of the tube can be quantified by ovality, and the values for hand-cut and cutter-cut are 11.5% and 4.3%, respectively. These suggested advantages could provide an inspiration for small factories and research institutes to reproduce our ideas or develop more efficient mechanisms. As additive manufacturing continues to advance, it is expected to significantly impact the prospective future of manufacturing processes, with expanded 3D printing capabilities via proposed practical application.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Keimyung University, Daegu, South Korea.

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Ota S. Current status of irradiated heat-shrinkable tubing in Japan. Radiat Phys Chem, 1981; 18(1–2):81–87; doi: 10.1016/0146-5724(81)90066-2
2. Haley R Wold RA Michels FB. Heat shrinkable products for electronics an overview of technology for the 1980’s. In: 1983 EIC 6th Electrical/Electronical Insulation Conference 1983; pp 279–287; doi: 10.1109/EEIC.1983.746508310.1109/EEIC.1983.7465083 ↗
3. Emoto Y, , Kano K, , Azuma S, et al. Dual-Wall heat-shrinkable tubing with hot-melt inner layer for anti-corrosion protection of automotive aluminum wires. SEI Tech Rev, 2020; 90.
4. 10.1109/57.83210.1109/57.832 ↗
5. 10.1007/s00170-023-11906-z10.1007/s00170-023-11906-z ↗
6. 10.1148/rg.201716016510.1148/rg.2017160165 ↗
7. 10.3390/ma1404102110.3390/ma14041021 ↗
8. 10.1088/1757-899X/392/6/06205010.1088/1757-899X/392/6/062050 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.03810.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.038 ↗
10. 10.3390/photonics1112114010.3390/photonics11121140 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.64210.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.642 ↗
12. Marone EM, , Auricchio F, , Marconi S, et al. Effectiveness of 3D printed models in the treatment of complex aortic diseases. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino), 2018; 59(5):699–706; doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.18.10324-7
13. 10.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.00110.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.001 ↗
14. 10.1038/487022a10.1038/487022a ↗
15. 10.1089/3dp.2013.000810.1089/3dp.2013.0008 ↗
16. 10.1089/3dp.2015.002710.1089/3dp.2015.0027 ↗
17. Ramya A, , Leela Vanapalli S. 3D printing technologies in various applications. Int J Mech Eng Technol, 2016; 7(3):396–409.
18. Karapnar M, , Gürkan S, , Alper Öner P, et al. Open source quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation monitoring. J Phys Conf Ser, 2016; 705(1):012008; doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/705/1/012008
19. 10.3390/buildings1106025410.3390/buildings11060254 ↗
20. 10.22306/atec.v5i1.4910.22306/atec.v5i1.49 ↗
21. 10.1089/3dp.2015.001910.1089/3dp.2015.0019 ↗
22. 10.3390/polym1309149910.3390/polym13091499 ↗
23. 10.3390/polym1208176510.3390/polym12081765 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.addma.2024.10417810.1016/j.addma.2024.104178 ↗
25. 10.1002/admt.20230142610.1002/admt.202301426 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41467-022-35622-610.1038/s41467-022-35622-6 ↗
27. 10.3390/ma1401019110.3390/ma14010191 ↗
28. 10.3390/polym1107109410.3390/polym11071094 ↗
29. Anonymous. Cutting tool technology. Cut Tool Technol, 2008; doi: 10.1007/978-1-84800-205-0
30. Selvamani SK Samykano M Subramaniam SR et al. 3D printing: Overview of ABS evolvement. In: AIP Conference Proceedings 2019; 2059; doi: 10.1063/1.5085984/79046010.1063/1.5085984 ↗
31. 10.1007/s00170-019-03313-010.1007/s00170-019-03313-0 ↗
32. 10.1108/RPJ-07-2018-018310.1108/RPJ-07-2018-0183 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.polymer.2016.06.04710.1016/j.polymer.2016.06.047 ↗