Performance evaluation of geopolymer concrete pavement after five years of service
Source abstract
Abstract
This study presents a five-year performance evaluation of a geopolymer concrete (GPC) pavement installed in 2019 in Alexandria, City of Sydney, as part of an Australian Government initiative supporting low-carbon infrastructure. The condition of the in-service GPC slab was compared with that of a companion blended cement concrete (BCC) slab, both subjected to identical traffic loads and environmental exposure. Visual inspection and testing reveal that while both slabs developed flexural and shrinkage cracks, the GPC exhibited only one flexural crack over five years, compared to three in the BCC slab. Surface abrasion was more pronounced in the GPC, resulting in greater surface loss. Cores showed that the GPC met the required design compressive strength but was 18% lower than the BCC. However, the performance difference in terms of abrasion is primarily attributed to aggregate grading and hardness – the GPC mix incorporated a gap-graded 14 mm olivine basalt. In comparison, BCC used a well-graded 8 mm granite aggregate. Image analysis confirms a higher aggregate fraction on a typical GPC surface than on a BCC surface. Petrographic analysis, along with on-site abrasion testing, indicates that aggregate hardness and grading significantly influence abrasion resistance. Both pavements have maintained their structural integrity under service conditions. The findings highlight the importance of selecting high-quality aggregates, their relative volume, and grading for pavement applications, and identify areas for improvement, including subgrade preparation and curing methods. With these enhancements, GPC has strong potential as a sustainable alternative for pavement applications and in infrastructure projects. • Five-year field performance of GPC and BCC pavements assessed under service conditions. • Direct comparison undertaken between GPC and BCC slabs under identical loading and exposure. • GPC showed greater surface abrasion due to aggregate grading and hardness. • Aggregate quality and gradation govern abrasion resistance more than binder type. • Results confirm GPC viability for pavements with optimised construction and mix design.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Concrete Properties and Behavior
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. F. Heimans, Developments in Concrete Pavements, Roads and Traffic Authority Oral History Program, 2002.
2. Alternative materials for wearing course of concrete pavements: a critical review10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117609 ↗
3. Simulating colling street strategies on urban heat islands effects: an empirical study for Blacktown city, Australia10.3992/jgb.17.2.143 ↗
4. Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
5. Geopolymers: Inorganic polymeric new materials10.1007/BF01912193 ↗
6. de Gutiérrez, Novel use of waste glass powder: production of geopolymeric tiles10.1016/j.apt.2018.09.023 ↗
7. Developing alkali-activated controlled low-strength material (CLSM) using urban waste glass and red mud for sustainable construction
8. Characterization of natural pozzolan-based geopolymeric binders10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.06.010 ↗
9. 2017 Review of Climate Change Policies, Commonwealth of Australia, 2017.
10. A.H. Mahmood, S.J. Foster, Performance of Geopolymer Concrete Pavement at Wyndham Street for City of Sydney: Update November 2020, University of New South Wales, Sydney NSW, Australia, 2021.
11. Designs of abrasion resistant and durable concrete pavements made with SCMs for cold climates10.1061/JPEODX.0000360 ↗
12. Abrasion resistance of concrete--design, construction and case study
13. Factors affecting deterioration of transverse cracks in jointed reinforced concrete pavements
14. Development of high-density geopolymer concrete with steel furnace slag aggregate for coastal protection structures10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118681 ↗
15. Effects of mixing duration on engineering properties of geopolymer concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124449 ↗
16. AS 1012.9:2014 Methods of testing concrete, Method 9: Compressive strength tests - Concrete, mortar and grout specimens, Standards Australia, 2014.
17. SA HB 79:2015 Alkali Aggregate Reaction—Guidelines on Minimising the Risk of Damage to Concrete Structures in Australia Standards Australia, 2015.
18. AS 1012.10-2000 Methods of testing concrete, Method 10: Determination of indirect tensile strength of concrete cylinders ('Brazil' or splitting test), Standards Australia, 2000.
19. ASTM C856/C856M-20 Standard Practice for Petrographic Examination of Hardened Concrete, ASTM International, 2019.
20. BS EN 13892-4:2002 Methods of test for screed materials - Part 4: Determination of wear resistance-BCA, 2020.
21. Abrasion resistant concrete floors
22. Munn · 1995 · 154
23. AS 3972:2010 General purpose and blended cements, Standards Australia, 2010.
24. Underwood · 1970
25. Particle Size Distribution
26. Projected Images
27. Computer Measurement of Images
28. Pour déterminer la composition des roches
29. The fundamental equation of quantitative microstructural analysis10.1016/0026-0800(75)90032-4 ↗
30. Russ · 1986
31. Carbonation of a low-calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete10.1680/jmacr.15.00486 ↗
32. Passivity of embedded reinforcement in carbonated low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.10.001 ↗
33. Drying and autogenous shrinkage of pastes and mortars with activated slag cement10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.11.002 ↗
34. Predicting Los Angeles abrasion of rocks from some physical and mechanical properties