journal article·2024-12Open access

Calculation of foam injection ratio and regulation method of muck compressibility under shield soil chamber pressure conditions

Shuying Wang, Bin Wang, Xiangcou Zheng, Yongjie Zhan

Abstract

The proper compressibility of shield muck is crucial for ensuring the safety and efficiency of shield tunneling. Foam conditioning is an effective method for improving the compressibility of muck. However, the amount of foam injected in practical construction is mostly based on experience or subjective judgment. A novel foam injection ratio calculation formula was derived based on Boyle’s law and the pore pressure calculation model. This formula comprehensively considers the impact of chamber pressure, pore water, soil gradation, and existing muck conditioning parameters on foam consumption. Starting with the premise that pore foam lifts the soil skeleton, reducing the effective stress in the soil to zero, a method for regulating the compressibility of muck in shield tunnel construction sites was proposed. This method presents the advantage of accurately quantifying the amount of foam injection. Verification results from field applications confirm that optimizing the muck conditioning parameters through this new method leads to improvements in workability, permeability, and muck compressibility, meeting the requirements for efficient shield tunneling. The fluctuation of chamber pressure is reduced, lowering the risk of tool wear. Additionally, there is a reduction of 29.96 % in average total thrust and 29.82 % in cutterhead torque, with a corresponding increase in tunneling speed by 24.42 %. Furthermore, the advantages and limitations of the proposed method were discussed.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Tunneling and Rock Mechanics · Grouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics · Drilling and Well Engineering

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. A state-of-art review on development and progress of backfill grouting materials for shield tunneling
2. Effect of foam conditioning on performance of EPB shield tunnelling through laboratory excavation test10.1016/j.trgeo.2021.100692 ↗
3. Advancing shallow tunnel construction in soft ground: the pipe-umbrella box jacking method10.1177/03611981231225430 ↗
4. The development of earth pressure shields: from the beginning to the present / Entwicklung der Erddruckschilde: Von den Anfängen bis zur Gegenwart10.1002/geot.201100003 ↗
5. Soil conditioning of sand for EPB applications: a laboratory research10.1016/j.tust.2007.04.010 ↗
6. Conditioning experiment on sand and cobble soil for shield tunneling10.1016/j.tust.2019.02.011 ↗
7. Earth pressure balance shield tunneling in sandy gravel deposits: a case study of application of soil conditioning10.1007/s10064-020-01856-1 ↗
8. Laboratory tests on conditioning the sandy cobble soil for EPB shield tunnelling and its field application10.1016/j.tust.2020.103512 ↗
9. Foam generation performance of earth pressure balance shield soil conditioning
10. Evaluation of tool wear in EPB tunneling of Tehran Metro, Line 7 expansion10.1016/j.tust.2016.11.001 ↗
11. A hybrid experiment/theory method for soil conditioning in sandy cobble strata with large cobbles and boulders10.1007/s10064-021-02418-9 ↗
12. Shear strength and compression coefficient for conditioned sand subjected to earth chamber stress levels10.1155/2018/1759151 ↗
13. S. Psomas, Properties of foam/sand mixtures for tunnelling applications, University of Oxford, 2001.
14. C. Budach, Untersuchungen zum erweiterten Einsatz von Erddruckschilden in grobkörnigem Lockergestein, Ruhr University Bochum, 2012.
15. U. Maidl, Erweiterung der Einsatzbereiche der Erddruckschilde durch Bodenkonditionierung mit Schaum, Ruhr University Bochum, 1995.
16. Use of chemical foam for improvements in drilling by earth-pressure balanced shields in granular soils10.1016/S0886-7798(98)00045-5 ↗
17. Soil conditioning for pipejacking and tunnelling: Properties of sand/foam mixtures
18. Duarte · 2007
19. Characterizing the influence of stress on foam conditioned sand for EPB tunneling10.1016/j.tust.2017.09.018 ↗
20. Undrained compressibility characteristics and pore pressure calculation model of foam-conditioned sand10.1016/j.tust.2021.104161 ↗
21. Effect of gradation on undrained compressibility of foam-conditioned coarse-grained soils10.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG-8163 ↗
22. Effect of hydraulic gradient on the permeability characteristics of foam-conditioned sand for mechanized tunnelling10.1016/j.tust.2020.103377 ↗
23. A lab-scale experimental approach to evaluate rheological properties of foam-conditioned soil for EPB shield tunnelling10.1016/j.tust.2022.104667 ↗
24. Undrained vane shear strength of sand-foam mixtures subjected to different shear rates10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.11.002 ↗
25. Effect of soil moisture and granulometry on soil conditioning for EPB-TBM tunneling: case study10.1520/JTE20190847 ↗
26. Shi · 2012
27. EFNARC, Specification and guidelines for the use of specialist products for mechanised tunnelling (TBM) in soft ground and hard rock, (2005).
28. T. Nomoto, O. Kusakabe, S. Imamura, Geotechnical criteria for selecting mechanized tunnel system and DMM for tunneling, in: Panel Discussion, 14th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Hamburg, 1997: pp. 2439–2440.
29. Foam used during EPB tunnelling in saturated sand, parameters determining foam consumption
30. One-dimensional compression theoretical model for shield foam-conditioned coarse-grained soil considering influences of gradation
31. Maximum and minimum void ratio characteristics of sands10.3208/sandf.42.6_65 ↗
32. Application ranges of EPB shields in coarse ground based on laboratory research10.1016/j.tust.2015.08.006 ↗
33. An experimental examination of foam stability under pressure for EPB TBM tunneling10.1016/j.tust.2018.02.011 ↗
34. Experimental study on the stability of foam-conditioned sand under pressure in the EPBM chamber10.1016/j.tust.2020.103590 ↗