Effects of marble waste on shear strength and pullout resistance of sand reinforced with Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) bars
Source abstract
Abstract
The growing emphasis on sustainability and environmental concerns is prompting researchers to explore ways to utilize waste materials. One such material is Marble Waste (MW), produced in large quantities during the production, cutting, and dressing of marble stones. The disposal of MW poses waste management and environmental challenges. In this study, MW, including Marble Powder (MP) and Marble Rubble (MR), were used as partial replacements for sand in GFRP-reinforced granular soil. The methodology involved determining basic geotechnical properties and Optimum Mixing Ratios (OMRs) for MW-sand (MWS) mixtures. A large shear box apparatus (0.6 m x 0.6 m x 0.3 m) was used to evaluate the shear strength of sand and optimum MWS samples, as well as the pullout resistance of 8 mm, 12 mm, 16 mm, 20 mm, and 25 mm Thread-Wrapped (TW) GFRP bars embedded in both sand and MWS samples. Sand with 14 % MP, 28 % MR, and 21 % (MP+MR) by weight were identified as OMRs. The optimum addition of MW to sand significantly improved both shear strength and pullout resistance of GFRP-reinforced sand. For instance, sand with the optimum addition of MP, MR, and MP+MR showed improvements of 8.2 %, 15 %, 23.4 %, 15.9 %, 21.2 %, and 24.5 % in the peak and ultimate angles of internal friction, respectively. Additionally, the peak pullout resistance of a 12 mm TW-GFRP bar embedded in the optimum MWS samples increased by 105 %, 126 %, and 139 %, compared to the bar embedded in the pure sand sample. Therefore, GFRP bars embedded in optimized MWS mixtures are proposed as a sustainable and eco-friendly soil-reinforcement method, which is also helpful in reducing the depletion of natural resources and promoting a circular economy.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (64)
Show source-provided references
1. Critical review for utilization of blast furnace slag in geotechnical application10.1007/978-981-15-6237-2_9 ↗
2. Rathje E., Trejo D., Folliard K. 2006 Project 0-477: Use of Recycled Asphalt Pavement and Crushed Concrete as Backfill for Mechanically Stabilized Earth Retaining Walls Potential Use of Crushed Concrete and Recycled Asphalt Pavement as Backfill for Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls.
3. Elias V., Christopher B.R., Berg R.R., Ryan R.Berg & Associates Inc 2001 Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls and Reinforced Soil Slopes: Design and Construction Guidelines (Updated Version). https://doi.org/10.21949/1503647.
4. Investigation of the influence of the addition of graphene oxide nanoparticles in mortars made with the addition of silica fume, marble powder and fibers from the crushing of the N95 face masks
5. FHWA 2004 Transportation Applications of Recycled Concrete Aggregate FHWA State of the Practice National Review.
6. Soleimanbeigi A., Likos W.J., Tanyu B.F., et al 2016 Recycled Materials as Backfill for Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls. 114.
7. Shear strength and pull-out response of tire shred-sand mixture reinforced with deformed steel bars
8. Licker · 2003 · 41
9. Effects of waste powder, fine and coarse marble aggregates on concrete compressive strength10.3390/su142114388 ↗
10. Influence of waste marble dust on the improvement of expansive clay soils
11. Marble waste: a problem or a resource
12. Experimental study on the behavior of waste marble powder as partial replacement of sand in concrete10.1007/s42452-020-03349-y ↗
13. Health risk assessment of marble dust at marble workshops
14. Utilization of waste marble powder as sustainable stabilization materials for subgrade layer10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100436 ↗
15. Utilization of MArble Piece Wastes as Base Materials10.1515/geo-2020-0197 ↗
16. Utilisation of waste marble dust for improved durability and cost efficiency of pozzolanic concrete10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122213 ↗
17. Long term strength and durability parameters of hardened concrete on partially replacing cement by dried waste marble powder slurry10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.005 ↗
18. Use of marble dust as paste replacement for recycling waste and improving durability and dimensional stability of mortar10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.154 ↗
19. Durability performance of concrete incorporating coarse aggregates from marble industry waste10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.037 ↗
20. Anderson P.L., Gladstone R.A., Sankey J.E. 2012 State of the Practice of MSE Wall Design for Highway Structures. 443–463. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412138.0018.10.1061/9780784412138.0018 ↗
21. AASHTO 2020 AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
22. Laboratory large-scale pullout investigation of a new reinforcement of composite geosynthetic strip10.1016/j.jrmge.2021.03.014 ↗
23. Tire shred backfill in mechanically stabilized earth wall applications
24. Full scale testing of geosynthetic reinforced walls
25. Numerical analysis of the behaviour of mechanically stabilized earth walls reinforced with different types of strips10.1016/j.geotexmem.2010.10.011 ↗
26. Sand-geotextile interface character monotonic cyclic direct shear tests10.1680/gein.12.00037 ↗
27. Aashto 2010 Aashto LRFD Bridge Design Specifications: Fifth Edition. Parts I and II. 1635 pp.
28. Interactions between soil and geogrids
29. Durability of concrete-encapsulated GFRP bars subjected to seawater immersion
30. Creep behaviour of geosynthetics10.1016/S0266-1144(98)00020-X ↗
31. Machine learning prediction of interfacial bond strength of FRP bars with different surface characteristics to concrete
32. Developing artificial neural network models to predict corrosion of reinforcement in mechanically stabilized earth walls10.1007/s00521-022-08043-1 ↗
33. Experimental investigation of the bond strength between GFRP and steel bars and soil-cement10.1016/j.istruc.2024.106761 ↗
34. A critical review on glass fiber-reinforced polymer bars as reinforcement in flexural members
35. What Is GFRP Bar | GFRP Bars Vs Steel Bars. 〈https://www.civilengineeringweb.com/2022/01/gfrp-bars-vs-steel-bars.html〉. (Accessed 1 May 2024).
36. Bond strength of GFRP bars to high strength and ultra-high strength fiber reinforced seawater sea-sand concrete (SSC)10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.115013 ↗
37. Bond behavior between GFRP bars and seawater sea-sand fiber-reinforced ultra-high strength concrete10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113787 ↗
38. Durability assessment of GFRP bars embedded in UHP-ECCs subjected to an accelerated aging environment with sustained loading10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135364 ↗
39. Effect of sustained loads on the durability of GFRP bars with and without UHP-ECC cover10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118050 ↗
40. Long-term durability of UHPECC-embedded GFRP bars in alkaline environments10.1061/JCCOF2.CCENG-4834 ↗
41. Field pullout testing and performance evaluation of GFRP soil nails10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000457 ↗
42. Experimental investigation of pullout behavior of fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcements in sand
43. ASTM D422 Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils. 〈https://www.astm.org/d0422-63r07.html〉. (Accessed 2 May 2024).
44. D4318 Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils. 〈https://www.astm.org/d4318-17e01.html〉. (Accessed 2 May 2024).
45. D854 Standard Test Methods for Specific Gravity of Soil Solids by the Water Displacement Method. 〈https://www.astm.org/standards/d854〉. (Accessed 2 May 2024).
46. C127 Standard Test Method for Relative Density (Specific Gravity) and Absorption of Coarse Aggregate (Withdrawn 2024). 〈https://www.astm.org/c0127-15.html〉. (Accessed 2 May 2024).
47. Characterization of Buner marble from Pakistan for construction purposes
48. ASTM Committee D-18 on Soil and Rock. 2009. Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Modified Effort (56,000 Ft-lbf/ft3 (2,700 KN-m/m3)) 1. ASTM International.
49. Evaluation of pull-out behavior of plain and deformed steel bars in tire shred –sand mixture using large scale model
50. Suncar O.E. 2010 Pullout and Tensile Behavior of Crimped Steel Reinforcement for Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) Walls. Master’s thesis submitted to the faculty of Utah State University, Logan, Utah 180.
51. Jehan Khan B., Ahmad I., Ali Khan S., et al 2021 Development and Calibration of Large-Scale Direct Shear Test Apparatus for Testing Geomaterial. Netherland International Journal of Applied Engineering Research Copyrights @ Roman Science Publications 6:
52. Stress-strain states differences in specimens during triaxial compression and direct shear tests10.1016/j.proeng.2017.02.094 ↗
53. Comparison of shear strength of sand backfills measured in small-scale and large-scale direct shear tests10.1139/T08-058 ↗
54. Relative density and relative compaction10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001642 ↗
55. D6706 Standard Test Method for Measuring Geosynthetic Pullout Resistance in Soil. 〈https://www.astm.org/d6706-01r13.html〉. (Accessed 2 May 2024).
56. Allen Paul Johnson B., Lawson W.D., Chair Priyantha Jayawickrama C.W., Casadonte D.J. (2013) Pullout resistance of mechanically stabilized earth reinforcements embedded in coarse backfill and measured in a large-scale test system (doctoral thesis).
57. Effect of rubber size on the behaviour of sand-rubber mixtures: a numerical investigation10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.07.005 ↗
58. Nicks J., Administration U. States F.H. 2013 Friction Angles of Open-Graded Aggregates from Large-Scale Direct Shear Testing: Tech Brief. https://doi.org/10.21949/1503647.
59. Reliability analysis of soil-geogrid pullout models in Japan10.1016/j.sandf.2012.07.004 ↗
60. Coronel, J.J. (2006). Frictional Interaction Properties between Geomaterials and Geosynthetics. (Master dissertation), Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College.
61. Experimental investigation of pullout behavior of fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcements in sand
62. Mechanical and hydraulic compatibility of RAP with geosynthetics used in MSE walls10.1680/jgein.21.00016 ↗
63. LRFD calibration for steel strip reinforced soil walls10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000665 ↗
64. Weldu M.T. 2015 Pullout Resistance of MSE Wall Steel Strip Reinforcement in Uniform Aggregate. (Thesis No - K-TRAN: KU-14-7) University of Kansas Dept of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering 66.