Optimal hysteresis of shape memory alloys for eliminating seismic pounding and unseating of movement joint systems
Source abstract
Abstract
Bridge structures adapt to movement through the addition of joint systems that accommodate anticipated movement due to temperature variations or earthquakes, thereby relieving stress on the bridge structure. Shape memory alloys (SMAs) have been proposed to limit joint displacements because of their ability to dissipate seismic energy and restore their original shape. A parametric study is conducted in this study using computer simulations of some advanced MATLAB programs to show the effects of all hysteretic parameters of SMA retrofit devices on seismic joint openings. The results show that SMA hysteretic parameters have a huge effect on SMA efficiency as a restrainer, which is compatible with energy dissipation philosophy, but there are some reversible impacts of some hysteretic parameters in some cases due to the resonance problem and their dependence on other parameters such as natural time period, period ratio, mass ratio, and seismic records. As a result, some design charts are created in this study after more than 200 million trials, taking into account the variation of all key parameters of the structure and the SMA under a suite of historical ground motion records. Moreover, bridge designers can choose optimal SMA hysteresis for a desired opening width, a desired time period, and desired period/mass ratios between adjacent frames with the help of these charts to overcome the two bridge problems of pounding and unseating of bridge decks.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis · Seismic Performance and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. Muthukumar · 2003
2. Caltrans structural control for bridges in high‐seismic zones10.1002/eqe.439 ↗
3. Chen, G., Mu, H. and Both, E.R. , 2001. Metallic dampers for seismic design and retrofit of bridges. Rep. No. RDT 01–005, Missouri Dept. of Transportation, Mo.Google Scholar.
4. Viscoelastic dampers at expansion joints for seismic protection of bridges10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2000)5:1(67) ↗
5. Dynamic characteristics of Chilean bridges with seismic protection10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2005)10:2(124) ↗
6. Application of shape memory alloy dampers in the seismic control of cable-stayed bridges10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.11.007 ↗
7. Design and analysis of braced frames with shape memory alloy and energy-absorbing hybrid devices10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.10.011 ↗
8. Shape memory alloy tension/ compression device for seismic retrofit of buildings10.1007/s11665-009-9433-7 ↗
9. Earthquake performance of steel frames with nitinol braces10.1080/13632460609350628 ↗
10. Seismic vibration control using superelastic shape memory alloys10.1115/1.2203109 ↗
11. Seismic assessment of concentrically braced steel frames with shape memory alloy braces10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:6(862) ↗
12. Implementation of shape memory alloy dampers for passive control of structures subjected to seismic excitations10.1016/j.jcsr.2007.02.001 ↗
13. The investigation of a shape memory alloy micro damper for MEMS applications10.3390/s7091887 ↗
14. Steel beam column connections using shape memory alloys10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:5(732) ↗
15. Analytical prediction of the seismic behavior of superelastic shape memory alloy reinforced concrete elements10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.05.025 ↗
16. Experimental study of novel self-centering seismic base isolators incorporating superelastic shape memory alloys10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002679 ↗
17. Shape memory alloy (SMA)-cable-controlled sliding bearings: development, testing, and system behavior10.1088/1361-665X/ab8f68 ↗
18. Parametric study of superelastic-sliding LRB system for seismic response control of continuous bridges10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001596 ↗
19. Shape memory alloy-spring damper for seismic control and its application to bridge with laminated rubber bearings10.1177/13694332211033955 ↗
20. Parametric study of SMA-based friction pendulum system for response control of bridges under near-fault ground motions10.1080/13632469.2019.1582442 ↗
21. Seismic performance upgrading of bridges using superelastic pendulum isolators with variable stiffness considering temperature effects10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115244 ↗
22. Multi-stage superelastic variable stiffness pendulum isolation system for seismic response control of bridges under near-fault earthquakes10.1002/stc.3114 ↗
23. Large-size shape memory alloy plates subjected to cyclic tension: Towards novel self-centring connections in steel frames10.1016/j.tws.2023.110591 ↗
24. Experimental behavior of R/C frames retrofitted with dissipating and re-centering braces10.1080/13632460409350493 ↗
25. Unseating prevention for multiple frame bridges using superelastic devices10.1088/0964-1726/14/3/008 ↗
26. Applications of shape memory alloys in civil structures10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.12.010 ↗
27. Seismic performance of bridges with high strength concrete columns reinforced with SMA-FRP jackets10.1088/1361-665X/aaf6d8 ↗
28. Local strengthening and repair of concrete bridge girders using shape memory alloy precast prestressing plate10.1177/1045389X20916793 ↗
29. Innovative local prestressing system for concrete crossties using shape memory alloys10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113048 ↗
30. Self-centring hybrid-steel-frames employing energy dissipation sequences: insights and inelastic seismic demand model
31. Self-centring damper with multi-energy-dissipation mechanisms: insights and structural seismic demand perspective10.1016/j.jcsr.2023.107837 ↗
32. Performance-based-plastic-design of damage-control steel MRFs equipped with self-centring energy dissipation bays10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107230 ↗
33. Life-cycle benefits estimation of self-centering building structures10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115982 ↗
34. Strain amplitude effects on the seismic performance of dampers utilizing shape memory alloy wires10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112708 ↗
35. Risk-based design and optimization of shape memory alloy restrained sliding bearings for highway bridges under near-fault ground motions10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112421 ↗
36. Seismic demand amplification of steel frames with SMAs induced by earthquake sequences10.1016/j.jcsr.2023.107929 ↗
37. Seismic evaluation of industrial steel moment resisting frames with shape memory alloys using performance-spectra-based method
38. Effect of hysteretic properties of superelastic shape memory alloys on the seismic performance of structures10.1002/stc.159 ↗
39. Efficiency of shape memory alloy seismic restrainers for several conditions of bridge joints
40. Comparison between shape memory alloy seismic restrainers and other bridge retrofit devices10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2007)12:6(700) ↗
41. Mitigating seismic bridge damage through shape memory alloy enhanced modular bridge expansion joints
42. Seismic performance of benchmark base-isolated bridges with superelastic Cu–Al–Be restraining damping device10.1002/stc.327 ↗
43. Superelastic pendulum isolator with multi-stage variable curvature for seismic resilience enhancement of cold-regional bridges10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115960 ↗
44. Superelastic CuAlBe wire-based sliding lead rubber bearings for seismic isolation of bridges in cold regions10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113102 ↗
45. Abaqus, 2016. Computer Software for Finite Element Analysis, Dassault Systems Simulia; Dassault SystèmesSimulia Corp: Providence, RI, USA.
46. Effect of welding separation characteristics on the cyclic behavior of steel plate shear walls10.3390/buildings12070879 ↗
47. Effect of stiffener characteristics on the seismic behavior and fracture tendency of steel shear walls10.3221/IGF-ESIS.54.07 ↗
48. Ansys Workbench , 2018. Computer Software for Finite Element Analysis, Verification Manual, Release 19.2; ANSYS Inc.: Canonsburg, PA, USA. [Google Scholar].
49. Behavior of structural concrete frames with hybrid reinforcement under cyclic loading10.3221/IGF-ESIS.57.07 ↗
50. Numerical analysis of FRP reinforced frames under cyclic loading
51. Theoretical study on the flexural behavior of structural elements strengthened with external pre-stressing methods10.3390/app12010171 ↗
52. Effect of external tendon profile on improving structural performance of RC beams10.3390/buildings12060789 ↗
53. Experimentally measured boundary and initial conditions for simulations
54. Influence of time delay and saturation capacity in control of structures under seismic excitations
55. Pole placement algorithm for control of civil structures subjected to earthquake excitation
56. A method of computation for structural dynamics10.1061/JMCEA3.0000098 ↗
57. Experimental and theoretical simulations of seismic poundings between two adjacent structures10.1002/eqe.231 ↗