Analyzing sustainability behavior of building materials using system dynamics and decision-making techniques
Source abstract
Abstract
The construction industry is a major contributor to environmental degradation, primarily through greenhouse gas emissions and resource consumption. To address these challenges, this research develops a comprehensive framework for selecting sustainable building materials that minimize environmental impact and support climate change mitigation. The proposed methodology is structured into three key stages: (1) identification of sustainability criteria, (2) simulation of sustainability behavior, and (3) selection of sustainable strategies. In the first stage, 27 sustainability parameters were identified through a systematic review of literature and rating systems. These parameters were evaluated using a structured questionnaire distributed to 70 construction experts, applying a 5-point Likert scale. Statistical analyses, including Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and factor loading, were used to assess reliability and validity, resulting in the elimination of 11 parameters and the result of 16 key criteria. The second stage involves developing a System Dynamics (SD) model to simulate the performance of building material alternatives against selected sustainability criteria. The model evaluates materials based on five key criteria: carbon emissions, energy savings, material cost, resource-use efficiency, and waste reduction. These criteria align with Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) 9 and SDG 12. In the final stage, the Best-Worst Method (BWM) and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) are integrated to prioritize and select the most suitable sustainable material strategy. The study evaluates five alternative material scenarios in comparison to a base case. As part of this process, a sustainability guide is developed, outlining the sustainability scores associated with each material alternative. Among the five scenarios, Scenario 3 emerges as the most sustainable option. This scenario comprises the use of reused steel, rapidly renewable wood, prefabricated gypsum board, and cast-in-place concrete. This combination achieves the highest overall sustainability score, demonstrating strong potential for supporting climate-conscious construction practices. The framework is validated through a case study of a healthcare facility in Suez, Egypt, demonstrating its applicability for real-world decision-making in sustainable construction practices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Sustainable Building Design and Assessment · Sustainable Supply Chain Management · Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (68)
Show source-provided references
1. Applying sustainability principles in the selection of building materials for buildings construction
2. Alhorr Y. GSAS Construction Management Assessment Manual for Buildings and Infrastructure. 4th Edition, Supreme Committee for Delivery & Legacy, Available at: <〈https://gsas.gord.qa/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/GSAS-2019-Construction-Management-Assessment.pdf〉>, 2019; accessed: August 25, 2025.
3. An Integrated BWM-TOPSIS-I approach to determine the ranking of alternatives and application of sustainability analysis of renewable energy10.3390/axioms12020159 ↗
4. Supplier selection to support environmental sustainability: the stratified BWM TOPSIS method10.1007/s10479-022-04878-y ↗
5. Comparative fit index: an index for testing the goodness of fit of structural models10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 ↗
6. Bollen · 1989
7. Note—a preference ranking organisation method: (The PROMETHEE method for multiple criteria decision-making)10.1287/mnsc.31.6.647 ↗
8. The MOORA method and its application to privatization in a transition economy
9. Life cycle assessment of building materials: comparative analysis of energy and environmental impacts and evaluation of the eco-efficiency improvement potential
10. Brown · 2015
11. Low emission zones: the likely effects on the freight transport sector10.1080/13675560500405899 ↗
12. A research on embodied energy of building materials: reflections on Turkey
13. A discussion on the reuse of building components in Brazil: an analysis of major social, economic and legal factors10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.07.004 ↗
14. Development of rating system for sustainable building in Malaysia
15. Egyptian Green Building Council · 2023
16. An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.466 ↗
17. Optimization model for sustainable materials, selection using objective and subjective factors10.1016/j.matdes.2012.10.013 ↗
18. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error10.1177/002224378101800104 ↗
19. The beginning of system dynamics
20. Investigating sustainability parameters of administrative buildings in Saudi Arabia10.1016/j.techfore.2016.01.016 ↗
21. Deconstruction waste management through 3d reconstruction and BIM: a case study10.1186/s40327-017-0050-5 ↗
22. The circular economy – a new sustainability paradigm10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048 ↗
23. Sustainable material selection for construction industry–A hybrid multi criteria decision making approach10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.100 ↗
24. Ho · 2006
25. The technology-environment relationship revisited: evidence from the impact of prefabrication on reducing construction waste10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130883 ↗
26. Predicting energy performances of buildings’ envelope wall materials via the random forest algorithm
27. Methods for multiple attribute decision making
28. MCDM-EFS: a novel ensemble feature selection method for software defect prediction using multi-criteria decision making
29. Assessment of labor productivity in construction projects using system dynamic approach
30. Kline · 2023
31. Prioritization of selection criteria for sustainable materials and equipment in construction projects by managing energy consumption using TOPSIS method
32. Sustainable material selection for building enclosure through ANP method
33. Selecting sustainable building materials using system dynamics and ant colony optimization10.3846/16486897.2013.788506 ↗
34. Environmental and economic impact assessment of construction and demolition waste disposal using system dynamics10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.10.015 ↗
35. Modeling sustainable building materials in Saudi Arabia" 2014 international conference on computing in civil and building engineering
36. A sustainable assessment model for material selection in construction industries perspective using hybrid MCDM approaches10.1108/JAMR-09-2018-0085 ↗
37. Eco-material selection using fuzzy TOPSIS method
38. Building energy efficiency using System dynamics approach - a case Study in an academic block
39. Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.430 ↗
40. Ranking dangerous sections of the road using MCDM model10.31181/dmame1901115n ↗
41. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1 ↗
42. A new model for determining weight coefficients of criteria in MCDM models: full consistency method (FUCOM)10.3390/sym10090393 ↗
43. How to do structural validity of a system dynamics type simulation model: the case of an energy policy model10.1016/j.enpol.2009.12.009 ↗
44. B. Estidama and the pearl rating system: a comprehensive review and alignment with LCA10.3390/su13095041 ↗
45. Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: some properties and a linear model10.1016/j.omega.2015.12.001 ↗
46. Problems with causal-loop diagram10.1002/sdr.4260020207 ↗
47. The Electre methodology
48. Rong · 2004
49. Relative importance index of sustainable design and construction activities criteria for green highway
50. Sabnis A., Mysore P., and Anant S. Construction Materials–Embodied Energy Footprint–Global Warming; Interaction. In Structural Engineers World Congress, Singapore, 2015.
51. The role of building construction materials on global warming: lessons for architects
52. Sustainable building materials assessment and selection using system dynamics
53. Sustainable rating systems around the world
54. Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: a review10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338 ↗
55. A conceptual and literature review of the effectiveness of BREEAM
56. An integrated BIM-based framework for the energy assessment of building upstream flow
57. Application of system dynamics for assessment of sustainable performance of construction project10.1631/BF02842066 ↗
58. Locating a disinfection facility for hazardous healthcare waste in the COVID-19 era: a novel approach based on Fermatean fuzzy ITARA-MARCOS and random forest recursive feature elimination algorithm10.1007/s10479-022-04822-0 ↗
59. An appraisal and operating characteristics of major ml methods applicable in healthcare and health science
60. Sterman · 2000 · 83
61. Book review: embodied carbon: the inventory of carbon and energy (ICE). A BSRIA Guide
62. A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analyses10.1007/BF02291170 ↗
63. Confirmatory analysis on factors influencing the material management effectiveness in construction projects10.1108/ECAM-09-2021-0811 ↗
64. Sustainability components affecting decisions for green building projects10.1016/S2212-5671(13)00087-7 ↗
65. Intelligent design of construction materials: a comparative study of ai approaches for predicting the strength of concrete with blast furnace slag10.3390/ma15134582 ↗
66. An approach for resilient-green supplier selection based on WASPAS, BWM, and TOPSIS under intuitionistic fuzzy sets
67. Zea Escamilla, E. Development of Simplified Life Cycle Assessment Methodology for Construction Materials and Buildings Outside of the European Context through the Use of Geographic Information Systems, Doctoral dissertation, ETH Zurich, 2015.
68. A system dynamics-based environmental benefit assessment model of construction waste reduction management at the design and construction stages10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.101 ↗