Experimental research on bond behavior of high-strength reinforcement in unconfined fly ash-based geopolymer concrete
Source abstract
Abstract
Geopolymer concrete (GPC) has emerged as an eco-friendly alternative to ordinary Portland cement (OPC) concrete in recent years, due to its superior mechanical properties and durability. A series of 48 pull-out tests investigated the bond behavior of high-strength reinforcement in unconfined fly ash-based GPC considering factors such as bond length, rebar size, concrete strength and cover thickness, and the results were compared with OPC concrete under identical conditions. A formula of ultimate bond strength and a bond stress-slip model were presented for unconfined GPC specimens that failed by concrete splitting. Test results showed that the ultimate bond strength of steel bars in unconfined GPC specimens increased with higher concrete compressive strength and thicker covers, but declined with longer bond lengths and larger rebar diameters. The OPC concrete specimens with a bond length of five times the rebar diameter happened in a pull-out failure mode, while the GPC specimens with the same experimental parameters failed by concrete splitting. When the steel bars had not yield until failure, the ultimate bond strengths of GPC specimens were higher than those of OPC concrete. Furthermore, increasing bond length altered the bond stress distribution and reduced the average ultimate bond strength between steel bars and GPC. The presented formula of ultimate bond strength and constitutive model can predict the experimental results of unconfined GPC specimens well with a certain safety margin.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Geopolymer concrete as sustainable material: a state of the art review10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124762 ↗
2. Global CO2 emissions from cement production10.5194/essd-10-195-2018 ↗
3. Alkali-activated binders: a review part 1. Historical background, terminology, reaction mechanisms and hydration products10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.10.015 ↗
4. Geopolymer concrete: a review of some recent developments10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.036 ↗
5. Setting time, strength, and bond of high-calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001157 ↗
6. Factors affecting the bond strength between the fly ash-based geopolymer concrete and steel reinforcement10.1016/j.istruc.2018.03.010 ↗
7. Experimental study of bond behavior of geopolymer concrete under different curing condition using a pull-out test10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137357 ↗
8. C.E.-Id Béton, CEB-FIP model code for concrete structures 2020, in: Proceedings of the International Federation for Structural Concrete, 2024.
9. ASTM A 944-99, Standard test method for comparing bond strength of steel reinforcing bars to concrete using beam-end specimens, in: Proceedings of the American Society for Testing and Materials Standard, West Conshohocken, US, 1999.
10. Engineering properties of aikali-activated fly ash concrete
11. Bond strength between blended slag and class F fly ash geopolymer concrete with steel reinforcement10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.02.016 ↗
12. Prediction of the steel-concrete bond strength from the compressive strength of portland cement and geopolymer concretes10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.002 ↗
13. Study on bond behavior between geopolymer concrete and steel bars
14. Bond performance of reinforced alkali-activated composites using water-quenched slag as alternative fine aggregates10.1016/j.istruc.2020.01.007 ↗
15. Bond stress between steel-reinforced bars and fly ash-based geopolymer concrete10.1155/2020/9812526 ↗
16. Bond behavior of reinforcing steel bar and geopolymer concrete10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003237 ↗
17. Bond slip models for uncorroded and corroded steel reinforcement in Class-F fly ash geopolymer concrete10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001713 ↗
18. Effect of temperature on bond characteristics of geopolymer concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.043 ↗
19. Bond performance of reinforcing bars in inorganic polymer concrete (IPC)10.1007/s10853-006-0534-5 ↗
20. Bond strength of reinforcing steel embedded in fly ash-based geopolymer concrete10.1617/s11527-010-9683-8 ↗
21. Bond performance of steel bar and fly ash-based geopolymer concrete in beam end tests10.3390/polym14102012 ↗
22. Bond performance of FRP bars in plain and fiber-reinforced geopolymer under pull-out loading
23. Machine learning prediction of interfacial bond strength of FRP bars with different surface characteristics to concrete
24. Y.L. Xu, Experimental study of anchorage properties for deformed steel bars in concrete, PhD thesis. Tsinghua University, Beijing, (1990) 37-38 (in Chinese).
25. Geopolymer concrete: a review of some recent developments10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.036 ↗