Optimizing performance and sustainability: Predictive modeling of RAB effects on CRMB in paving applications
Source abstract
Abstract
In recent years, asphalt recycling and cost-effective, cleaner production methods have become crucial for enhancing binder properties in the paving industry. This study aims to determine the optimal percentage of reclaimed asphalt binder (RAB) in crumb rubber modified binder (CRMB) by investigating both rheological and viscoelastic properties. The results demonstrate a direct correlation between CRMB viscosity and RAB percentage, emphasizing the need to limit RAB to mitigate potential increases in pollution and energy consumption. While RAB negatively impacts low-temperature performance, up to 40 % RAB does not affect the low performance grade (PG). Increasing RAB beyond 60 % improves rutting resistance by counteracting temperature and stress effects. Classification using PG and MSCR methods identified that CRMB with RAB60 and RAB80, both rated at PG76S-16, exhibits optimal performance. The LAS test results indicate that as strain increases, higher RAB percentages (above 50 %) adversely affect fatigue performance; however, binders with greater CRM proportions demonstrate superior fatigue resistance due to the presence of a polymer network. Variance analysis reveals that test temperature, RAB percentage, and stress level significantly influence the rutting resistance and Jnr parameter of rubberized asphalt. Both the regression and neural network models exhibit strong predictive performance, with the regression model slightly outperforming the neural network. Based on the results of response surface methodology (RSM) analysis, the optimal percentage of RAB in CRMB was determined to be 50 %, 69 %, 33 %, and 55 % for temperate regions with standard traffic, tropical regions, cold regions, and temperate regions with very heavy traffic, respectively. The simultaneous use of a softer binder (PG52–28), RAB, and CRM provides optimal performance conditions, suitable temperature ranges, and high resistance to traffic. • The study finds 50 % RAB optimal for CRMB in various climates. • Excessive RAB lowers low-temp and fatigue resistance; above 60 % boosts rutting resistance. • Temperature, RAB %, and stress affect performance; MVR and ANN models predict well.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Transport Systems and Technology
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (64)
Show source-provided references
1. Association · 2014 · 77 · 1040
2. A review on the effect of RAP recycling on bituminous mixtures properties and the viability of multi-recycling10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.258 ↗
3. Glover · 2009
4. Performance evaluation of asphalt mixtures with reclaimed asphalt pavement and recycled asphalt shingles in Missouri10.1177/0361198119825638 ↗
5. Understanding effects of RAP on rheological performance and chemical composition of SBS modified binder using series of laboratory tests10.1016/j.ijprt.2016.06.002 ↗
6. A comparative environmental impact analysis of asphalt mixtures containing crumb rubber and reclaimed asphalt pavement using life cycle assessment10.1080/10298436.2019.1623404 ↗
7. Hot mix asphalt with high RAP content10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.009 ↗
8. Rutting characterization of warm mix asphalt and high RAP mixtures10.1080/14680629.2012.657042 ↗
9. Laboratory evaluation of rutting and moisture damage resistance of glass fiber modified warm mix asphalt incorporating high RAP proportion10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.168 ↗
10. The determination of mechanical performance of laboratory produced hot mix asphalt mixtures using controlled RAP and virgin aggregate size fractions10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.06.068 ↗
11. The use of rejuvenating agents in production of recycled hot mix asphalt: a systematic review10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.015 ↗
12. Effect of WMA-RAP technology on pavement performance of asphalt mixture: a state-of-the-art review10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121704 ↗
13. Effects of high reclaimed asphalt-pavement content on the binder grade, fatigue performance, fractionation process, and mix design10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001694 ↗
14. Using the GMDH and ANFIS methods for predicting the crack resistance of fibre reinforced high RAP asphalt mixtures10.1080/14680629.2020.1748693 ↗
15. Investigating the ANN model for cracking of HMA in terms of temperature, RAP and fibre content10.1080/10298436.2020.1758935 ↗
16. The search for a measure of fatigue cracking in asphalt binders–a review of different approaches10.1080/10298436.2017.1279490 ↗
17. Rheological modification of bitumen with maleic anhydride and dicarboxylic acids10.1016/S0016-2361(98)00120-3 ↗
18. Investigating the influence of SBS and gilsonite on the rheological properties of asphalt binder using statistical analysis
19. A review of the use of recycled solid waste materials in asphalt pavements10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.02.002 ↗
20. Recycling of waste materials for asphalt concrete and bitumen: a review10.3390/ma13071495 ↗
21. Effect of crumb rubber modifier on the performance properties of rubberized binders10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001661 ↗
22. The influence of nanoclay on the performance properties and moisture susceptibility of rubberized asphalt mixture10.1080/10916466.2016.1248775 ↗
23. Predicting rutting performance of carbon nano tube (CNT) asphalt binders using regression models and neural networks10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.071 ↗
24. Performance of rubber modified asphalt mixture with tire-derived aggregate subgrade10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.138261 ↗
25. Laboratory performance and field demonstration of asphalt overlay with recycled rubber and tire fabric fiber10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136941 ↗
26. Resurface of rubber modified asphalt mixture with stress absorbing membrane interlayer: from laboratory to field application10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137452 ↗
27. Investigating the performance of rubberised binders used in Iran based on multiple stress creep recovery and performance grading systems10.1080/14680629.2016.1274676 ↗
28. Investigating the effect of amorphous carbon powder on the moisture sensitivity, fatigue performance and rutting resistance of rubberized asphalt concrete mixtures10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.039 ↗
29. Rutting resistance, fatigue properties and temperature susceptibility of nano clay modified asphalt rubber binder10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120946 ↗
30. Using polymer modification and rejuvenators to improve the performance of high reclaimed asphalt pavement mixtures10.3141/2575-02 ↗
31. Influence of waste engine oil on asphalt mixtures containing reclaimed asphalt pavement10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001292 ↗
32. Effect of laboratory aging on chemistry and rheology of crumb rubber modified bitumen10.1617/s11527-020-1451-9 ↗
33. Crumb rubber asphalt mixtures: a literature review10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118577 ↗
34. Recycled tyre rubber modified bitumens for road asphalt mixtures: a literature review10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.09.007 ↗
35. Evaluation of warm mix asphalt mixtures containing reclaimed asphalt pavement and crumb rubber10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.079 ↗
36. Effects of waste frying oil and crumb rubber on the characteristics of a reclaimed asphalt pavement binder10.3390/ma14133482 ↗
37. Performance of high content reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) in asphaltic mix with crumb rubber modifier and waste engine oil as rejuvenator10.3390/app11115226 ↗
38. Effects of waste engine oil and crumb rubber rejuvenator on the performance of 100% RAP binder10.53635/jit.1072888 ↗
39. Molecular interactions between rubber and asphalt10.1021/ie050905r ↗
40. A review on the effect of crumb rubber addition to the rheology of crumb rubber modified bitumen10.1155/2013/415246 ↗
41. Investigating the effectiveness of vacuum tower bottoms for asphalt rubber binder based on performance properties and statistical analysis10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.103 ↗
42. Swelling process of rubber in asphalt and its effect on the structure and properties of rubber and asphalt10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.10.021 ↗
43. Standard test methods for quantitative extraction of asphalt binder from asphalt mixtures
44. Standard practice for recovery of asphalt from solution using the rotary evaporator
45. Investigation of blending conditions effect on GTR dissolution and rheological properties of rubberized binders10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117828 ↗
46. Comparison of asphalt emulsion-based chip seal and hot rubber asphalt-based chip seal
47. Influence of carbon nanotubes on performance properties and storage stability of SBS modified asphalt binders10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001910 ↗
48. Manual, H.S., American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Washington, DC, 2010. 19192.
49. T313 · 2012
50. Use of the multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) test to characterize the rutting potential of asphalt binders: a literature review10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121320 ↗
51. Rheological analysis of multi-stress creep recovery (MSCR) test10.1080/10298436.2011.573557 ↗
52. Rutting resistance and fatigue behavior of gilsonite-modified asphalt binders10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002468 ↗
53. The effect of different aging conditions and strain levels on relationship between fatigue life of asphalt binders and mixtures10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118345 ↗
54. Performance characterization of warm-mix asphalt containing high reclaimed-asphalt pavement with bio-oil rejuvenator10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003481 ↗
55. Relations between colloidal indices and low-temperature properties of reclaimed binder modified with softer binder, oil-rejuvenator and polybutadiene rubber10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117800 ↗
56. Chemical composition and rheological characteristics of binders containing RAP and rejuvenator10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003016 ↗
57. Effect of colloidal structure of bituminous binder blends on linear viscoelastic behaviour of mixtures containing reclaimed asphalt pavement10.1016/j.matdes.2016.07.124 ↗
58. Relationship between rheological properties of RAP binders and cohesive surface free energy10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003199 ↗
59. Blending efficiency of reclaimed asphalt rubber pavement mixture and its correlation with cracking resistance10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106506 ↗
60. Investigation of the rheological properties and storage stability of CR/SBS modified asphalt10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.10.022 ↗
61. Use of the MSCR test to characterize the asphalt binder properties relative to HMA rutting performance–A laboratory study10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.06.044 ↗
62. Literature review of the multiple stress creep and recovery, performance-related test10.1061/JPEODX.0000248 ↗
63. Relationship between multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) binder test results and asphalt concrete rutting resistance in Brazilian roadways10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.216 ↗
64. High-temperature properties of asphalt binders: comparison of multiple stress creep recovery and performance grading systems10.3141/2574-15 ↗