Impact behavior of no-stirrup Reinforced Concrete Beam with Cushion
Source abstract
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to clarify impact response of no-shear-reinforcement reinforced concrete (RC) beams having cushion layers subjected to impact loading. The beams, which are designed with Polystyrene (Beam S type) and Polycarbonate (Beam P type), were tested by drop-weight experiment with various height of impact at 4.0, 4.5 and 5 m compared to no-cushion-designed beam (Beam N) at accordingly impact velocities. The weight of 169 kg was free falling to mid-span of the beams which have dimension of width, depth and clear span length are 150, 250 and 2000 mm. After testing, crack patterns propagated from the side surfaces of the RC beams was sketched, and impact forces, reaction forces and mid-span deflection was measured and recorded by wide-band analog data recorders. In addition, a comparative static loading test of no-stirrup beam (Beam NS) was used to establish an analytical fiber model of the beam under impact loading. The results obtained are as follows: 1) No-stirrup RC beams governed by shear-failure-mode or combined shear- and flexural- failure mode with diagonal cracks, while those with cushion almost exhibited flexural-failure-mode with significant fewer cracks; 2) At velocity of 4 m/s, no-cushion-designed beam’s performance indicate the yielding stage in brittle failure mode of no-stirrup RC beam; 3) To quantitively estimate the contribution of the cushion on the beam have and have-not cushion, a proposed simplified fiber model was used with comparison to its static performance in order to determined maximum deflection of the beams; 4) It is assumed that initial dissipated energy does not occurred in beams have cushion, while beams have-not cushion own this due to its brittle failure mode; 5) It is found that estimated maximum deflections of the beam are in line with the measured values; 6) Dynamic absorbed energy of the cushion are higher than static absorbed energy of the cushions, which lead to higher contribution of the cushion in impact event.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Impact behavior of shear-failure-type RC beams without shear rebar10.1016/S0734-743X(01)00149-X ↗
2. Effects of shear mechanisms on impact behavior of Reinforced Concrete Beams
3. Shear mechanisms in Reinforced Concrete Beams under Impact loading10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001818 ↗
4. Investigating the failure behaviors of RC beams without stirrups under impact loading10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.103432 ↗
5. Impact response of reinforced concrete beam and its analytical evaluation10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000039 ↗
6. Numerical model for flexural behavior of reinforced concrete members subjected to low-velocity impact loads
7. Simplified estimation method for maximum deflection in bending-failure-type reinforced concrete beams subjected to collion action and its application range10.3390/app10196941 ↗
8. Performance of reinforced concrete beam with cushion subjected to impact loading
9. Axial impact behavior and energy absorption of rubberized concrete with/without fiber-reinforced polymer confinement10.1177/2041419618800771 ↗
10. Use of rubberized concrete as a cushion layer in bulletproof fiber reinforced concrete panels10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.12.068 ↗
11. Performance of used tire cushion layer under rockfall impact
12. Experimental study on impact absorption capacity of various expanded materials for rock shed
13. Impact behavior of FRP-strengthened RC beams wihout stirrups10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000671 ↗
14. Japanese_Society_of_Civil_Engineers_(JSCE), "Standard Specifications for Concrete Structure 2007- Design," JSCE 2010 Concrete Committee, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://www.jsce-int.org/about/guideline. [Accessed April 2021].
15. JIS, JIS G 3137:2020 Small diameter steel bars for prestressed concrete, Tokyo, 2020.
16. Japanese_Industrial_Standard_(JIS) and Japanese_Standards_Association_(JSA), JIS G 3112: Steel bars for concrete reinforcement, JSA, 2020.
17. Japanese_Industrial_Standard_(JIS) and Japanese_Standards_Association_(JSA), JIS K 7220:2006: Rigid cellular plastics - Determination of compression properties, JSA, 2006.
18. Compressive response of polymeric foams under quasi-static, medium and high strain rate conditions10.1016/j.polymertesting.2006.05.005 ↗
19. Hydrostatic compression of anisotropic low density polymeric foams under multiple loadings and unloadings10.1016/j.polymertesting.2011.06.002 ↗
20. Constitutive modelling of polymeric foam material subjected to dynamic crash loading10.1016/S0734-743X(97)00087-0 ↗
21. Static and dynamic mechanical properties of expanded polystyrene10.1016/j.matdes.2014.12.024 ↗
22. On the accuracy, reliability and controllability of impact tests of RC beams10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2021.103979 ↗
23. Empirical formulas for designing reinforced concrete beams under impact loading
24. Analysis of reinforced concrete beams subjected to severe concentrated loads
25. Material behaviour of polymers under impact loading10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.02.007 ↗
26. Low velocity localized impact study of cellular foams10.1016/j.matdes.2006.09.023 ↗
27. Comparison of FEM and SPH for modeling a Crushable Foam Aircraft Arrestor Bed, 11th Int
28. Impact response of reinforced concrete beam with cushion using finite-element analysis, Case Stud
29. Plastic strain gradients and transient fatigue crack growth: a computational study10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.11.020 ↗