journal article·2023-07Open access

Experimental study on the mechanical performance of tyre encased soil elements for structural wall applications

Yachong Xu, Md. Rajibul Karim, Martin Freney, Md. Mizanur Rahman, Reza Hassanli, Yan Zhuge

Abstract

Tyre-encased-soil elements (TESEs) are segmental units made by compacting soil inside the cavity of EOL tyres. The TESEs can function similarly to bricks to build masonry walls or other load-bearing structures. Tyre walls built of TESEs have proven successful architectural and structural performance. However, the mechanical properties of TESEs have not been scientifically investigated in the past, and insufficient evidence restricted TESEs’ further application as structural components. This project attempted to fill the gap by studying the performance of TESEs subject to axial compressive loads through both laboratory experiments and analytical analysis. Soils with different properties were used in the experiments to quantify their influence on the TESEs performance. It was found that within the range of loading applied in this study, no abrupt failure was observed on the tested TESEs. The axial stress-strain relationship followed an exponential form, possibly due to the strain-hardening effect brought in by the densification of encased soil and increased confinement support from the tyre reinforcement. The encased soil’s density had a significant influence on the load-deformation behaviour of the TESEs. However, the load-carrying capacities were not highly sensitive to the soil type and its moisture content. An analytical model was proposed for capturing the axial and radial strain of TESEs under applied axial loads with a reasonable accuracy. In material characterisation, the strength of EOL tyres captured in the inflation tests were significantly larger than those obtained from direct tensile tests, which revealed the cut tyre strip could not capture the synergic effect of the embedded tyre reinforcement composites in a representative manner. The results of this study can be used by built environment professionals to design and analyse the performance of tyre encased soil and tyre walls.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis · Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (81)

Show source-provided references
1. Gilson, 2017. Tyre Stewardship Australia annual report, Tyre Stewardship Australia, Collingwood, VIC, Australia, 2017.
2. End-of-life tyres: comparative life cycle assessment of treatment scenarios10.3390/app11083599 ↗
3. An extension, flexural, and warping model of soil reinforced by used tire's portions related by linear inclusion10.1016/j.euromechsol.2005.03.006 ↗
4. N.T. Long, 1996. 'Lightweight Pneusol’, the stability of slopes and recovering the residual value of industrial byproducts, The Seventh International Symposium on Landslides, A.A. Balkema, Trondheim, Norway, 1996.
5. M. Anderson, I. Hatherly, 2009. Tyre disposal sites in the West Midlands region of the UK as mosquito breeding sites, 2009.
6. K. Reschner, 2008. Scrap tire recycling, A summary of prevalent disposal and recycling methods. Entire-Engineering, Berlin, (2008).
7. R.B. Craven, D.A. Eliason, D.B. Francy, P. Reiter, E.G. Campos, W.L. Jakob, G.C. Smith, C.J. Bozzi, C. Moore, G.O. Maupin, 1988. Importation of Ades albopictus and other exotic mosquito species into the Unites States in used tires from Asia, 1988.
8. Behaviour of subballast reinforced with used tyre and potential application in rail tracks10.1016/j.trgeo.2017.08.006 ↗
9. Tire-reinforced earthfill. Part 1: construction of a test fill, performance, and retaining wall design10.1139/t99-084 ↗
10. Tire-reinforced earthfill. Part 2: pull-out behaviour and reinforced slope design10.1139/t99-085 ↗
11. Aging of natural rubber in air and seawater10.5254/1.3547641 ↗
12. Tire-reinforced earthfill. Part 3: environmental assessment10.1139/t99-086 ↗
13. Fatigue behavior of natural rubber in marine environment: Comparison between air and sea water10.1016/j.matdes.2014.09.032 ↗
14. Economic analysis of rubber modified asphalt mixes10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1988)114:3(259) ↗
15. Design of highway embankments using tire chips10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:4(295) ↗
16. Use of scrap tires in road construction10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1992)118:3(561) ↗
17. Physical and chemical properties of recycled tire shreds for use in construction10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2003)129:10(921) ↗
18. Construction of a test embankment using a sand–tire shred mixture as fill material10.1016/j.wasman.2005.10.009 ↗
19. Bearing capacity of a square model footing on sand reinforced with shredded tire – An experimental investigation10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.092 ↗
20. R.A. Forsyth, J.P. Egan Jr, 1976. Use of waste materials in embankment construction, Committee on Earthwork Construction1976.
21. Experimental investigations on the mechanically stabilised earth wall under static load conditions
22. Laboratory pullout investigation for evaluate feasibility use of scrap tire as reinforcement element in mechanically stabilized earth walls10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117726 ↗
23. Experimental study of embankments with different reinforcement materials and spacing between layers10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.03.003 ↗
24. Performance of rubber tire-confined capping layer under cyclic loading for railroad conditions10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002199 ↗
25. Earthship monitoring and thermal simulation10.1080/00038628.2013.809688 ↗
26. Experimental study on the structural performance of full-scale tyre wall for residential housing applications10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114181 ↗
27. M. Freney, V. Soebarto, T. Williamson, 2012. Learning from ‘Earthship’based on monitoring and thermal simulation, 46th Annual Conference of the Architectural Science Association (ANZAScA), Griffith University, 2012.
28. M. Freney, V. Soebarto, T. Williamson, 2013. Thermal comfort of global model earthship in various European climates, Building Simulation 2013: 13th International Conference of the International Building Performance Simulation Association, 2013, pp. 1625–1632.10.26868/25222708.2013.1137 ↗
29. Thermal behaviour of an earth-sheltered autonomous building - The Brighton Earthship10.1016/j.renene.2009.02.006 ↗
30. N.J. Kruis, M.K. Heun, 2007. Analysis of the performance of Earthship housing in various global climates, ASME 2007 Energy Sustainability Conference, 2007, pp. 431–440.10.1115/ES2007-36030 ↗
31. M. Reynolds, 2000. Comfort in any climate, Solar Survival Press, Taos, NM, USA, 2000.
32. Investigation on Civil Engineering Application of Tyre Encased Soil Element: Laboratory Direct Shear Test and Supply Chain Analysis10.3390/su142214852 ↗
33. Model Tests and Analytical Studies on Performance of Areca Leaf Cells as Cellular Confinement in Soil
34. Three-dimensional stability of locally loaded geocell-reinforced slopes by strength reduction method10.1080/17486025.2019.1581275 ↗
35. Effects of Geocell Confinement on Strength and Deformation Behavior of Gravel10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000757 ↗
36. J. Han, S. Pokharel, R. Parsons, D. Leshchinsky, I. Halahmi, 2010. Effect of infill material on the performance of geocell-reinforced bases, 9th International Conference on Geosynthetics, International Geosynthetics Society São Paulo, Brazil, 2010, pp. 1503–1506.
37. Experiment and 3D-numerical studies on soft clay bed reinforced with different types of cellular confinement systems10.1016/j.trgeo.2017.01.001 ↗
38. Reuse of waste tire textile fibers as soil reinforcement10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.253 ↗
39. Laboratory assessing of the liquefaction potential and strength properties of Sand soil treated with mixture of nanoclay and glass fiber under dynamic and static loading10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.08.059 ↗
40. Effects of addition of waste tyre fibres and cement on the engineering behaviour of Perth sand10.1080/17486025.2017.1325941 ↗
41. The effect measured of the rubber membrane on the triaxial compression strength of clay samples10.1680/geot.1952.3.1.20 ↗
42. Large-Scale triaxial compression testing of Geocell-Reinforced granular soils10.1520/GTJ10050J ↗
43. Confinement effect of geocells on sand samples under triaxial compression10.1016/j.geotexmem.2013.01.004 ↗
44. Evaluation of required stiffness and strength of cellular geosynthetics10.1680/jgein.21.00032 ↗
45. Analyzing the deformation and failure of geosynthetic-encased granular soil in the triaxial stress condition10.1016/j.geotexmem.2020.06.007 ↗
46. Large-scale triaxial compression tests of geocell-reinforced sand10.1680/jgein.19.00019 ↗
47. J. Wesseloo, 2006. The strength and stiffness of geocell support packs, University of Pretoria, 2006.
48. The stress-strain behaviour of multiple cell geocell packs10.1016/j.geotexmem.2008.05.009 ↗
49. Investigation of factors influencing behavior of single geocell-reinforced bases under static loading10.1016/j.geotexmem.2010.06.002 ↗
50. M. Rai, 2010. Geocell-sand mattress overlying soft clay subgradei: Behaviour under circular loading, 2010.
51. Influence of subgrade strength on the performance of geocell-reinforced foundation systems10.1680/gein.13.00025 ↗
52. Behavior of Geosynthetic Reinforced soil foundation systems supported on stiff clay subgrade10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000559 ↗
53. Model studies on circular footing supported on geocell reinforced sand underlain by soft clay10.1016/S0266-1144(03)00017-7 ↗
54. Model studies on geocell supported embankments constructed over a soft clay foundation10.1520/GTJ11122J ↗
55. Bearing capacity of strip footings supported on geocell-reinforced sand10.1016/S0266-1144(01)00006-1 ↗
56. Effect of Geocell type on load-carrying mechanisms of Geocell-Reinforced sand foundations10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000162 ↗
57. Behaviour of sand confined with single and multiple geocells10.1016/S0266-1144(98)00034-X ↗
58. Influence of relative density of soil on performance of geocell-reinforced sand foundations10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000040 ↗
59. 2014
60. Application of scrap tires as earth reinforcement for repair of tropical residual soil slope
61. Hibbeler · 2010
62. R. Muscoplat, 2019. Why tire shops refuse to do a tire repair, 2019. https://ricksfreeautorepairadvice.com/tire-shop-refuses-to-do-tire-repair/. (Accessed 1/10/2022 2022).
63. Standards Australia, AS 1289.3.6.1–2009, Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes - Soil classification tests - Determination of the particle size distribution of a soil - Standard method of analysis by sieving, Standards Australia Limited, Australia, 2009.
64. Malvern Panalytical, 2018. MASTERSIZER 3000 - Smarter particle sizing, 2018. https://www.malvernpanalytical.com/en/assets/BRMastersizer3000EN2_tcm50–58994.pdf.
65. Standards Australia, AS 1289.3.1.1–2009, Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes - Soil classification tests - Determination of the liquid limit of a soil - Four point Casagrande method, Standards Australia Limited, Australia, 2009.
66. Standards Australia, AS 1289.3.2.1–2009, Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes - Soil classification tests - Determination of the plastic limit of a soil - Standard method, Standards Australia Limited, Australia, 2009.
67. Standards Australia, AS 1289.3.3.1–2009, Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes-Soil classification tests - Calculation of the plasticity index of a soil, Standards Australia Limited, Australia, 2009.
68. Liquid and plastic limits as determined from the fall cone and the Casagrande methods10.1520/GTJ10135J ↗
69. Standards Australia, AS 1289.3.9.1:2015 Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes, Method 3.9.1: Soil classification tests - Determination of the cone liquid limit of a soil, Standards Australia Limited, Australia, 2015.
70. Standards Australia, AS 1289.5.1.1, Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes - Soil compaction and density tests—Determination of the dry density/moisture content relation of a soil using standard compactive effort, Standards Australia Limited, Australia, 2017.
71. 2011
72. AUSTROADS, '92 Austroads bridge design code, AUSTROADS, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 1992.
73. Swiss Standard, SN 670 010b, Characteristic coefficients of soils, Association of Swiss Road and Traffic Engineers Swiss Standard, Characteristic Coefficients of soils, Association of Swiss Road and Traffic Engineers, Swiss.
74. EcorisQ, USCS Soil Classes, 2019. https://www.ecorisq.org/docs/USCS_soilclasses.pdf. (Accessed 7 November 2022).
75. Effects of compaction moisture content on the shear strength of an unsaturated clay10.1023/B:GEGE.0000018349.40866.3e ↗
76. Effect of optimum compaction moisture content formulations on the strength and durability of sustainable stabilised materials10.1016/j.clay.2018.02.036 ↗
77. Effect of compaction water content on the strength of cement-stabilized rammed earth materials10.1139/cgj-2013-0339 ↗
78. N. Janbu, 1963. Soil compressibility as determined by oedometer and triaxial tests, European conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Wiesbaden, 1963, pp. 19–25.
79. The coefficient of earth pressure at rest
80. On the stability of loose earth
81. C.A. Coulomb, 1776.Essais sur une application des règles des maxims et minimis à quelques problèmes de statique relatifs à l’architecture, De l'Imprimerie Royale, Paris, 1776.