Model tests on 3D soil arching in pile-supported embankments with and without geotextile
Source abstract
Abstract
Compared to traditional soil improvement methods such as preloading, vertical drains, or grouting injection, et al., pile-supported reinforced embankments are increasing widely employed in the construction of highways on soft soils. A series of three-dimensional model tests on pile-reinforced embankments, utilizing a square arrangement for pile caps, were conducted to investigate the effects of pile-subsoil relative displacement, embankment height, tensile strength of geotextiles, and clear spacing of pile caps on the stress concentration ratio and the height of the equal settlement plane. The results indicate a close relationship between the soil arching effect and pile-subsoil relative displacement. The stress concentration ratio, from the results of this study, reaches its maximum value when the pile-subsoil relative displacement is approximately 6 to 8 mm. A larger embankment height to pile-cap clear spacing ratio, h/s, as well as the of pile-cap width to its clear spacing ratio, b/s, will result in a larger stress concentration ratio and a smaller differential settlement on the embankment surface. The inclusion of geotextiles can effectively enhance the soil arching effect, i.e., increasing the stress concentration ratio and lessening the fill differential settlement, especially for those low embankments. The model test results also shown that the height of the equal settlement plane in 3D soil arch is approximately 3.5 times the pile-cap clear spacing regardless of the inclusion of the geotextiles or not. In addition, by comparing the measured stress concentration ratio with the calculated values from various design methods, valuable conclusions have been derived.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics · Grouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. Deep soil mixing used to reduce embankment settlement10.1680/gi.1999.030402 ↗
2. Recent development of geosynthetic-reinforced column-supported embankments
3. Tensile force of geogrids embedded in pile-supported reinforced embankment: a full-scale experimental study10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.08.001 ↗
4. Performance of pile-supported embankment over soft soil: full-scale experiment10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000561 ↗
5. Field study and numerical modelling for a road embankment built on soft soil improved with concrete injected columns and geosynthetics reinforced platform10.1016/j.geotexmem.2020.12.010 ↗
6. Theoretical study and field tests on pile-supported embankments over soft ground10.1061/41025(338)3 ↗
7. Analysis of piled embankments
8. Arching in piled embankments10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:11(1917) ↗
9. German recommendations for soil reinforcement above pile-elements
10. Arching in ideal soils10.1002/9780470172766.ch5 ↗
11. Deformations in trapdoor tests and piled embankments10.1680/jgein.19.00014 ↗
12. Grouted gravel column-supported highway embankment over soft clay: case study10.1139/cgj-2014-0284 ↗
13. Quantitative performance evaluation of GRPE: a full-scale modeling approach10.1680/jgein.19.00017 ↗
14. Three-dimensional numerical modeling of a piled embankment10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2009)9:3(102) ↗
15. Three-dimensional finite-element analysis of arching in a piled embankment10.1680/geot.9.P.113 ↗
16. 2D and 3D analyses of an embankment on clay improved by soil–cement columns10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.03.014 ↗
17. Three-dimensional modeling of the behavior of geotextile sheets as membranes10.1177/004051759806801103 ↗
18. Geosynthetic reinforcement of pile-supported embankments10.1680/jgein.17.00032 ↗
19. Geosynthetic-reinforced pile-supported embankments: state of the art10.1680/jgein.20.00005 ↗
20. Serviceability design for geosynthetic reinforced column supported embankments10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.02.006 ↗
21. Long-term reinforcement strains for column supported embankments with viscous reinforcement by FEM10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.04.003 ↗
22. Short-term stability of reinforced embankment over clayey foundation10.3208/sandf1972.27.3_43 ↗
23. Pile-supported embankment over soft soil for a high-speed line
24. Analytical solutions for collapse mechanisms in tunnels with arbitrary cross sections10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.09.028 ↗
25. A simplified 2-D evaluation method of the arching effect for geosynthetic-reinforced and pile-supported embankments10.1016/j.compgeo.2014.11.014 ↗
26. Nonlinear failure envelope for soils10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1989)115:4(581) ↗
27. An analytical method for predicting load acting on geosynthetic overlying voids10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.07.007 ↗
28. Performance of geosynthetic-reinforced and pile-supported embankment with consideration of soil arching10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001536 ↗
29. British Standards Institution. (2010). Code of Practice for Strengthened/reinforced Soils and Other Fills: BS 8006–1: 2010. BSi.
30. Johnson. (2011). Recommendations for Design and Analysis of Earth Structures using Geosynthetic Reinforcements - EBGEO, Second Edition. Ernst & Sohn.
31. Design guideline basal reinforced piled embankments
32. Iglesia, G.R. (1991). Trapdoor experiments on the centrifuge: A study of arching in geomaterials and similitude in geotechnical models. Ph. D Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
33. Determination of vertical loading on underground structures based on an arching evolution concept
34. Investigation of soil arching with centrifuge tests10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000998 ↗
35. Load-transfer platform behaviour in embankments supported on semi-rigid columns: implications of the ground reaction curve10.1139/cgj-2016-0406 ↗
36. Mathematical modelling of the mechanical response of earth embankments on piled foundations10.1680/jgeot.18.P.127 ↗
37. Mangraviti, V. (2021). Theoretical modelling of embankments based on pile foundations. Ph. D Thesis, Milano, 12 May, 2021.
38. A rheological model for georeinforced embankments based on piled foundations10.1088/1757-899X/1260/1/012014 ↗
39. Mathematical modelling of the mechanical response of geosynthetic‐reinforced and pile‐supported embankments10.1002/nag.3586 ↗
40. Geosynthetic-reinforced and pile-supported embankments: theoretical discussion of finite difference numerical analyses results
41. Progressive development of two-dimensional soil arching with displacement10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001025 ↗
42. A field study on the arching behavior of a geogrid-reinforced floating pile-supported embankment10.1016/j.trgeo.2022.100795 ↗
43. Field and 3D numerical investigations of the performances of stiffened deep cement mixing column-supported embankments built on soft soil10.1007/s13369-022-07322-2 ↗
44. Soil arching effect in reinforced piled embankment for motor-racing circuit: field tests and numerical analysis10.1016/j.trgeo.2022.100844 ↗
45. Jones, C.J.F.P., Lawson, C.R., & Ayres, D.J. (1990). Geotextile reinforced piled embankments. Geotextiles, Geomembranes and Related Products, Den Hoedt (ed.), 155–160.
46. An experimental investigation of soil arching within basal reinforced and unreinforced piled embankments10.1016/j.geotexmem.2007.05.004 ↗
47. An analytical model for arching in piled embankments10.1016/j.geotexmem.2013.07.005 ↗
48. Analysis and modification of the British Standard BS8006 for the design of piled embankments10.1016/j.geotexmem.2011.02.001 ↗
49. Model experiments on piled embankments. Part II10.1016/j.geotexmem.2011.11.003 ↗
50. Validation of analytical models for the design of basal reinforced piled embankments10.1016/j.geotexmem.2014.10.002 ↗
51. Centrifuge modeling of granular soil response over active circular trapdoors10.3208/sandf.47.931 ↗
52. Failure mechanisms in sand over a deep active trapdoor10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000134 ↗
53. Validation of centrifuge model scaling for soil systems via trapdoor tests10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000517 ↗