Dynamic response of RC frames retrofitted with friction-damped brace system through shaking table tests
Source abstract
Abstract
This study presents the shaking table test results of two-dimensional reinforced concrete (RC) frames retrofitted with a simplified friction damped brace. An easy-to-manufacture and install friction damper with economical design, was proposed and tested under reversed cyclic loading and used to retrofit RC frames. The splice of a conventional steel brace was converted into a friction damper, which not only dissipated seismic energy but also helped avoid the buckling of the steel brace. The test scheme consisted of four RC frames, and the behaviors of the three retrofitted frames were compared with that of a non-retrofitted (bare) frame. The shaking table tests were conducted using an artificial seismic wave that reflected the short-period response characteristics of the Korean earthquake. The test results of the bare and retrofitted frames were analyzed by considering several important performance indicators, such as the cracking and fracture mechanism in the RC frames, base share, and story drift ratios. The results of the shaking table tests demonstrated that the proposed damped brace effectively reduced earthquake-induced drift demands and successfully shifted the fracture and damage concentration from the columns to the beams.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Seismic Performance and Analysis · Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis · Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Performance-based seismic evaluation of two five-story precast concrete hybrid frame buildings10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:11(1489) ↗
2. Cyclic behavior of prestressed precast concrete walls
3. Internal force and deformation of concrete-filled steel plate composite coupling beams10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.09.014 ↗
4. Experimental investigation and design of steel brace connection to RC frame10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00162-7 ↗
5. Design of steel brace connection to an RC frame using Uniform Force Method10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.09.010 ↗
6. Seismic performance of different types of connections between steel bracing and RC frames10.1007/s40996-016-0034-z ↗
7. Mechanical compression release device in steel bracing system for retrofitting RC frames10.1007/s11803-006-0626-x ↗
8. The effects of steel X-brace retrofitting of RC frames on the seismic performance of frames and their elements10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110149 ↗
9. The effects of retrofitting RC frames by X-bracing on the seismic performance of columns10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.003 ↗
10. Connection overstrength in steel-braced RC frames10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.12.016 ↗
11. Parametric study of self-centering concentrically-braced frame systems with friction-based energy dissipation
12. Structural and nonstructural performance evaluation of self-centering, concentrically braced frames under seismic loading
13. Self-centering energy dissipative bracing system for the seismic resistance of structures: development and validation10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:1(96) ↗
14. Development and experimental validation of a nickel–titanium shape memory alloy self-centering buckling-restrained brace10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.02.037 ↗
15. Development and validation tests of a dual-core self-centering sandwiched buckling-restrained brace (SC-SBRB) for seismic resistance10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.04.015 ↗
16. Seismic response control of building structures with superelastic shape memory alloy wire dampers10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2008)134:3(240) ↗
17. Influence of shape memory alloy brace design parameters on seismic performance of self-centering steel frame buildings
18. Seismic performance of a reinforced concrete building retrofitted with self-centering shape memory alloy braces10.1016/j.prostr.2023.01.126 ↗
19. Dolce M., Cardone D. Theoretical and experimental studies for the application of shape memory alloys in civil engineering 2006.10.1115/1.2203106 ↗
20. Rehabilitation of buildings and bridges by using shape memory alloys (SMA)
21. Concilio A., Antonucci V., Auricchio F., Lecce L., Sacco E. Shape Memory Alloy Engineering: For Aerospace, Structural, and Biomedical Applications. 2021. 〈https://doi.org/10.1016/B978–0-12–819264-1.01001–3〉.10.1016/B978-0-12-819264-1.01001-3 ↗
22. Dynamic testing of precast, post-tensioned rocking wall systems with alternative dissipating solutions10.5459/bnzsee.41.2.90-103 ↗
23. Seismic retrofit of existing SRC frames using rocking walls and steel dampers10.1007/s11709-011-0114-x ↗
24. The dynamics of an elastic structure coupled with a rocking wall10.1002/eqe.2838 ↗
25. Seismic response of a yielding structure coupled with a rocking wall10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001894 ↗
26. Seismic retrofit of a steel-reinforced concrete hospital building using continuous energy-dissipative steel columns
27. An innovative methodology for seismic retrofitting of existing RC buildings by metal shear panels10.1002/eqe.841 ↗
28. Experimental evaluation and numerical simulation of low-yield-point steel shear panel dampers10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112860 ↗
29. A design method for seismic retrofit of reinforced concrete frame buildings using aluminum shear panels10.1007/s43452-023-00639-1 ↗
30. Seismic response of steel frame structures with hybrid passive control systems10.1002/eqe.1153 ↗
31. Seismic resistibility of high-rise buildings with combined velocity-dependent and velocity-independent devices
32. Seismic performance evaluation of moment frames with slit-friction hybrid dampers10.12989/eas.2015.9.6.1291 ↗
33. Seismic performance of steel plate slit-friction hybrid dampers10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.05.005 ↗
34. Optimum distribution of steel slit-friction hybrid dampers based on life cycle cost
35. Seismic performance evaluation of a structure retrofitted using steel slit dampers with shape memory alloy bars10.1007/s13296-017-1227-4 ↗
36. Balancing lateral loads using tendon-based supplemental damping system10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:8(896) ↗
37. The damped cable system for seismic protection of frame structures—Part I: General concepts, testing and modeling10.1002/eqe.1166 ↗
38. Non-linear dynamic modelling and design procedure of FV spring-dampers for base isolation10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00063-3 ↗
39. Seismic retrofit of a framed structure using damped cable systems
40. Seismic performance evaluation of a spring viscous damper cable system10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.09.055 ↗
41. AISC. Specification for Structural Steel Buildings, an American National Standard, 2016.
42. AIK. KDS 14 31 25:2017, Steel Structure Connection Design Criteria (Load Resistance Factor Design Method), 2017.
43. 2017
44. AIK. KDS 41 17 00, Seismic Design Standards for Buildings, Architectural Institute of Korea, 2019.
45. ACI Committee. Building Code Requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318–19). American Concrete Institute; 2019.
46. Longitudinal axial strain in plastic hinge regions of reinforced-concrete columns10.1680/jmacr.17.00438 ↗
47. Deformability of reinforced concrete columns failing in shear after flexural reinforcement yielding
48. Grondin G., Jin M., Josi G. Slip Critical Bolted Connections — A Reliability Analysis for Design at the Ultimate Limit State. vol. 76. 2008.