Development of superpave regional implementation framework in developing countries with hot and arid climates: Egyptian case study
Source abstract
Abstract
Superpave proved its superiority over other conventional methods. The Superpave system with its fundamental and flexible nature is capable of integrating more promising solutions to pavement problems. Developing countries are still straggling to shift to the Superpave system due to its complexity; as it heavily relies on fundamentals and needs substantial experience and a supporting data bank to be implemented. This research aims at developing a framework to implement Superpave in developing countries addressing the expected challenges and mitigating them. This framework is an initiative step towards the full implementation of the Superpave system in developing countries. The framework is successfully developed and then implemented in Egypt as a case study to verify and validate its applicability in developing countries with prevailing hot and arid climates.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Laboratory analysis of marshall parameters of dense bituminous macadam mix using waste materials10.1504/IJETM.2018.097918 ↗
2. Pavement deterioration and its causes.
3. History and future challenges of gyratory compaction: 1939 to 2001.10.3141/1789-22 ↗
4. Evaluation of the pavement performance.
5. Saudy, Maram, and Khedr, Safwan. Evaluation of normal and modified asphalt according to conventional and modern grading systems. DOI: 10.14455/ISEC. res. 2016.58, Proceedings of the First European and Mediterranean Structural Engineering and Construction, At Istanbul, Turkey (2016).10.14455/ISEC.res.2016.58 ↗
6. F.L. Roberts, P.S. Kandhal, E.R. Brown, D.Y. Lee, T.W. Kennedy, Hot Mix Asphalt Materials, Mixture Design and Construction, National Asphalt Pavement Association Research and Education Foundation, Lanham, Maryland, 1996.
7. An initial investigation of the use of local industrial wastes and by-products as mineral fillers in stone mastic asphalt pavements.
8. Development of a Model to Predict Pavement Temperature for Ghat Region in Libya
9. Evaluation of the pavement performance
10. A review on using crumb rubber in reinforcement of asphalt pavement
11. Study on Thermal Oxidation of Asphalt Fractions By in Situ FTIR Analysis
12. Dawson, Andrew. 2014. Anticipating and Responding to Pavement Performance as Climate Changes.” Pp. 127–57 in Climate change, energy, sustainability and pavements. Springer. Asphalt rubber; Chip seals; Condition surveys; Guidelines; Hot mix asphalt; Mix design; Pavement performance; Specifications; Streets; Surface treating; Viscosity.10.1007/978-3-662-44719-2_4 ↗
13. ASTM, Standard specification for penetration-graded asphalt binder for use in pavement construction. ASTM D946/946M, West Conshohocken, PA., 2015.
14. ASTM, Standard specification for viscosity-graded asphalt binder for use in pavement construction. ASTM D3381, West Conshohocken, PA, 2018.
15. R.B. McGennis, S. Shuler, H.U. Bahia, Background of Superpave asphalt binder test methods. Federal Highway Administration, Office of Technology Applications, 1994.
16. Development of a performance grading system for asphalt binders used in Thailand
17. Development of pavement temperature predictive models using thermophysical properties to assess urban climates in the built environment10.1016/j.scs.2016.01.012 ↗
18. AASHTO, Standard specification for performance-graded asphalt binder. AASHTO M 320, Washington, DC, 2016.
19. ASTM, Standard specification for performance graded asphalt binder. ASTM D6373, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015.
20. AASHTO, Standard test method for determining the rheological properties of asphalt binder using a dynamic shear rheometer (DSR). AASHTO T 315, Washington, DC, 2012.
21. ASTM, Standard test method for determining the rheological properties of asphalt binder using a dynamic shear rheometer. ASTM D7175, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015.
22. AASHTO, Standard method of test for determining the flexural creep stiffness of asphalt binder using the bending beam rheometer (BBR). AASHTO T 313, Washington, DC, 2016.
23. ASTM, Standard test method for determining the flexural creep stiffness of asphalt binder using the bending beam rheometer (BBR). ASTM D6648, West Conshohocken, PA, 2016.
24. AASHTO, Standard method of test for determining the fracture properties of asphalt binder in direct tension (DT). AASHTO T 314, Washington, DC, 2016.
25. ASTM, Standard test method for determining the fracture properties of asphalt binder in direct tension (DT). ASTM D6723, West Conshohocken, PA, 2012.
26. AASHTO, Standard practice for accelerated aging of asphalt binder using a pressurized aging vessel (PAV). AASHTO R 28, Washington, DC, 2016.
27. ASTM, Standard practice for accelerated aging of asphalt binder using a pressurized aging vessel (PAV). ASTM D6521, West Conshohocken, PA, 2018.
28. AASHTO, Standard method of test for effect of heat and air on a moving film of asphalt binder (Rolling Thin-Film Oven Test). AASHTO T 240, Washington, DC, 2016.
29. ASTM, Standard test method for effect of heat and air on a moving film of asphalt (Rolling Thin-Film Oven Test). ASTM D2872, West Conshohocken, PA, 2019.
30. Review of the Superpave performance grading system and recent developments in the performance-based test methods for asphalt binder characterization10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126063 ↗
31. Development of SUPERPAVE high temperature performance grade (PG) based on rutting damage
32. FHWA, L.T.P.P.B.I.N.D., Version 3.1 Beta, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, 2005.
33. Stochastic decision modeling for sustainable pavement designs10.1007/s11367-014-0723-4 ↗
34. Klomp, A.J.G., & Niesman, T.W. Observed and calculated strains at various depths in asphalt pavements. In Intl Conf Struct Design Asphalt Pvmts. (1967, January). https://trid.trb.org/view/104832.
35. Al-Mistarehi, B. (2014). Superpave system versus marshall design procedure for asphalt paving mixtures (comparative study). Global Journal of Research in Engineering. Vol 14, No 5-G (2014).
36. Comparison of asphalt mixtures designed using the marshall and improved GTM methods
37. Mallick · 2017 · 391
38. Olard, F. and S. Pouget. A New Approach for Aggregate Grading Optimization for Mixtures. Pp. 427–57 in Advances in Asphalt Materials. Elsevier. 2015.10.1016/B978-0-08-100269-8.00014-3 ↗
39. El-Atrash, Khlifa. Modified marshall mix design method for asphalt roads in hot and arid climate. Diss. École de technologie supérieure, 2020.
40. Superpave performance graded asphalt binder selection for asphalt mixture design in Ghana.
41. Asphalt binder performance grading of North Korea for Superpave asphalt mix-design.10.1016/j.ijprt.2018.06.004 ↗
42. Asphalt Institute, Superpave series No.2 (SP-2), third edition, 2001.
43. EC (Egyptian Code for Rural and Urban Roads Construction) (2008). 1st edition.
44. Development and impact of the Egyptian climatic conditions on flexible pavement performance
45. D.N. Little, W.W. Crockford, and V.K.R. Gaddam (1991). Resilient Modulus of Asphalt Concrete’’, FHW Report No.TX-93–1177–1F, Texas Transportation Institute.